Trademark assessors should refer to similar trademark reexamination cases.

Judges of the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board should refer to similar cases of trademark review, not just treat them as individual cases, so as to improve the quality and level of trademark review, avoid the social consumption of manpower, material resources and time caused by submitting trademarks for review after rejection, and improve social and economic benefits.

For example, the 32 trademarks of Tianya Sanya 9 109828 are similar to those of Tianya Spring 324 15932. Successful registration after rejection shows that Tianya Sanya is not like Tianya Sanya, Tianya Youyou Sanya 202 16 150 is like Tianya Spring and Tianya Sanya. After the veto, the core part was passed, which can be seen. Therefore, when examining the 29 trademarks of Tianya, the assessor should consider the fact that Tianya Youpin 2 1406337 is not similar to Tianya Youpin 203 10224, instead of just judging Tianya Youpin as a case. The opinions of the evaluation experts should be consistent with those of the appraisers. Also, if 32 Tianya Youpin pass the audit, then the audit basis of 32 Tianya Chun25158202 should be universal, because according to the audit case, Tianya Chunpin is not similar to Tianya Youpin and Sanya Tianya. I hope that the assessors can consider objectively and adopt the opinions of the assessment experts.

For information about trademark review, please call the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board (010-63219181).

Bajie Trademark Network provides trademark transfer service, saving trademark registration time by purchasing trademarks.