Debate: Can a person with high face value succeed? How should the opposing party argue that Yan value has nothing to do with success? A person's success depends on hard work and ability. It doesn't mean that you can achieve high value without hard work and ability. If it matters, the higher the face value, the harder it is to succeed. Didn't you say that beautiful women are unlucky? It is because of failure that fate is so tragic.
In the debate, "success" is more important than "adulthood" How to argue? To be a talented person, you must learn to study. As far as China's contemporary society is concerned, it has moved from an academic society and an identity society to a capable society. College students are in an important stage of life growth, and all have the potential to become talents. But you can't think that you have become a talent just because you are a college student. College students are only a basic condition for future success.
(1) Clear orientation.
The successful orientation of college students is based on adapting to social needs, giving full play to their own advantages and making use of realistic conditions. Only by combining these three factors can success be possible.
(2) improve their own quality.
Opportunities are only given to those who are prepared. The main task of college students is learning, and the content of learning is not only book knowledge, but also practical knowledge. The study of these two kinds of knowledge is to improve one's own quality and prepare for future success.
First, we must lay a solid cultural foundation. Cultural knowledge is the foundation and condition for the growth of talents, and plays a key role in the success of college students. This includes solid and generous basic knowledge, profound professional knowledge and comprehensive knowledge.
Second, we should strengthen practical exercise. Nowadays, college students' social practice activities have undergone changes from organization to autonomy, from centralization to decentralization, from free to paid, from professionalism to sociality, and from singleness to pluralism. These changes are the reflection of the progress of the times and the result of social development.
Third, keep a healthy mind. At present, a word "depression" is popular on campus. "I didn't do well in the exam and I was very depressed", "I was depressed when I met difficulties in life" and "I didn't handle the relationship with my classmates well and I was very depressed"; "The unsuccessful election of student cadres is frustrating"; "I want to find a job soon after graduation, and I am very depressed", and so on. "Depression" is like a mirror, which expresses many college students' wandering and hazy emotional confusion. If this kind of depression is not solved and released for a long time, it will affect mental health, resulting in mental illness.
Judging from the current situation, the common psychological diseases of college students are neurasthenia, depression, anxiety and psychological emergency-suicide. Among them, the incidence of neurasthenia among college students is about 8.5%. Therefore, it is very important for contemporary college students to constantly improve their mental health level, adjust their mentality and have a healthy psychology. Time is a good medicine to cure mental illness and adjust mentality. Learn to forget and endure, and life will be sunny and happy. In study and life, don't give up your right to be happy, keep discovering happiness, creating happiness and enjoying happiness.
When self-regulation fails, we should turn to psychological counseling, make full use of psychological counseling channels such as psychological hotline, group counseling, consultation email, and mutual communication, and accept outside help and guidance, so as to effectively maintain mental health, optimize psychological quality, and promote personality perfection.
Debate is also called debate and debate. Formally, it is a contest in which two participants debate a certain issue. In fact, it is a contest of related knowledge, thinking reflection ability, language expression ability and comprehensive ability around the debate.
In the environmental debate, the opposing side starts with major events. How should we argue? Explain what is important. Major events can be major aspects or major directions, which are policies. Personally, I think that major events can move closer to the policy direction. Only when * * * has formulated relevant comprehensive and perfect policies can we grasp the correct direction of environmental protection.
What are the signs of success or failure in today's society? Nowadays, it has become a social reality that money is the only criterion, social status and so on. Maybe people will say that there are other spiritual wealth. When people are busy making a living, where can they have time to improve and enjoy spiritual wealth? Now money decides everything, can't it be said that he decides success or failure?
Love, wealth, success and love are the focus of debate. The process of success may be different. Some people are faster, others are slower. It doesn't matter. No matter whether they succeed sooner or later, as long as they succeed in the end, they'd better have the last laugh.
Perseverance will eventually lead to satisfactory results. On the way forward, neither you nor I have the right to laugh at those who keep advancing, because success lies in their unremitting progress, so we have no choice but to respect and learn.
How to prepare well before the debate: first, study your own ideas carefully, not only on your own side, but also on the other side.
Remember all the information you find carefully, not necessarily all, but you should be able to say it in your own words.
Third, find a good question to ask each other in case of situation and take the initiative.
Be calm during the game: during the game, many players think they are nervous and their brains can't react, so they are passive!
I am a novice in a debate competition, and I urgently need to fully explain the importance of the above points on the basis of coping with "world economic integration" and promoting "the establishment of friendly strategic partnership between the two countries", and ask whether the other party agrees with it, and then ask whether the other party should learn this language.
Urgent, urgent, urgent! Excuse me, heroes, how to debate this debate? Positive debate: Thank you, Madam President. Hello, debaters, teachers, judges and classmates! Our view is that prosperity is conducive to the cultivation of talents. Of course, we don't deny that adversity can also cultivate talents, but we think prosperity is more conducive to the cultivation of talents than adversity. Talents refer to those who are outstanding and have both ability and political integrity. What we mean by prosperity is to provide good conditions for the development of such talents. Our chief designer, Comrade * * *, put forward the policy of reform and opening up, which provided smoother and superior conditions for the development of talents. In this great prosperity, China has a large number of talented people. This shows that prosperity gives talents more opportunities for performance and development, and prosperity is more conducive to the production of talents.
Excuse me, another debater, can you deny that there is unprecedented prosperity now compared with before liberation? Can you deny that there are many more talents now than before liberation? If we can't deny this, how can we deny our point of view?
Refute the other side's argument: first of all, thank the other side for admitting our point of view: adversity can also produce talents. What is this? We believe that adversity is the external resistance that people encounter in the process of becoming useful, including difficult and tragic situations. What you said before liberation was mainly a tragic situation, and you haven't touched on the difficult situation yet. If a person wants to become a talent, he must constantly overcome difficulties, which inevitably puts himself in a difficult position, so it is impossible to produce talents in prosperity, but only in adversity. Specifically, first, the history of mankind began when apes overcame adversity and walked out of the forest. They are the earliest talents. Second, adversity is everywhere, and there is bound to be resistance in progress. Only by overcoming all kinds of resistance can talents be produced; Third, it is human nature to take refuge easily. In prosperity, people tend to be complacent. Mencius said, "Born in sorrow, died in happiness". Only in adversity can people turn pressure into motivation and promote the success of their careers.
Two arguments: first of all, I want to ask my opponent, is the difficulty adversity? You said that difficulties are adversity, but you should know that eating without food and dressing without covering your body are the most typical adversity! It seems that you are inclined to adversity, but you say that it is human nature to take refuge. How can this make sense? Our argument has repeatedly shown that adversity can produce talents, but prosperity is more conducive to producing talents, so prosperity produces talents, and adversity produces talents is the relationship between the mainstream and the tributary. According to statistics from all aspects, the probability of producing talents in adversity is far lower than that in prosperity. Today, Comrade * * * has created such a good prosperity for us, which has brought forth many talented people. Isn't it easier to produce talents in prosperous times?
Counterparty argument: first of all, point out a blind spot of the other party. You've been ignoring people's subjective factors. Our understanding of adversity includes subjective and objective aspects. We believe that adversity is the collision of internal and external factors, and the collision produces resistance. For those who want to succeed, the higher they climb, the greater the difficulty. Since difficulties are inevitable in the process of success, adversity is inevitable. The process of a person's maturity is the process of experiencing adversity, and the process of a person's success is also the process of overcoming adversity. As "Caigen Tan" said: "In adversity, the whole body is needle stone grass, but not knowing it, but in the environment, but not knowing it."
Three arguments: I want to remind the other party that you still haven't solved the problem that "difficulty equals adversity" We just pointed out in the second debate that only survival problems, such as hunger, are typical adversity. How do you answer this question? You say that success is a collision between subjective and objective, but Marxist philosophy tells us that only matter determines consciousness, and there is no so-called collision when subjective consciousness and matter are juxtaposed. How do other debaters explain it? We still insist that prosperity produces more talents than adversity. According to the statistics of relevant newspapers, 60% of the talents in the world come from prosperity, while only 40% come from adversity. How does the other party explain this? Also, I want to ask another debater: Are apes also talents? (Laughter and applause)
Three arguments against the other side: I admire the other side's argument about the percentage of talents, but what is the "relevant" method of "related newspaper" Are you sure about the reliability of the data? Secondly, how can humans come without apes? It is not that we prefer adversity, but that adversity exists objectively. We should understand that there is no "Utopia" that is not contradictory and hard. The so-called Utopia and "Peach Blossom Garden" only exist in the books of thinkers and writers. Therefore, a real person is never afraid of adversity. American writer Emerson said: "A good wise man will not give up this opportunity to learn"; Beveridge, a professor of pathology in Britain, said: "People's best work is often done under unfavorable circumstances, and mental stress and even physical pain may become spiritual stimulants." .
PRESIDENT: Let's start a free debate.
Pro: Same question: Is difficulty equal to adversity? It has never been clear whether the adversity mentioned by the other debater is difficult or what.
Counterparty: We have already explained this issue. Why did the other debater turn a deaf ear? We say that adversity produces talents but prosperity does not produce talents, and talents come from adversity 100%. This is because the growth history of all talents is really a process of getting out of adversity and overcoming it. Ostrovsky was blind and paralyzed, but he wrote, "How is steel tempered?" Edison finally invented the electric light after all kinds of hardships, Cervantes wrote Don Quixote as poor as a church mouse, and Cao Xueqin wrote A Dream of Red Mansions after the adversity that his family was copied ... These examples all show that adversity makes talents.
Professor: Just now we listed the data, 60% and 40%. It is an indisputable fact that prosperity is more conducive to the production of talents.
Counterparty: The opposing debater only writes data. Why not give some examples to illustrate the problem?
Pro: Since the other debater is so obsessed with giving examples, let me give an example. For example, some people give up when they encounter setbacks-according to the other side, setbacks are adversity-so what is their talent?
Opposing party: Now many countries are carrying out frustration education, isn't it just to better train talents?
…………
President: Next, we invite both sides to make concluding remarks.
Counterparty: I want to point out the other party's mistakes first. First, the other party made a logical mistake by inferring the conditions with the results; Second, the other party only has abstract conclusions, but even a concrete example can't be given; Third, the other party misunderstood our meaning and regarded talent as 100% from adversity. Let's summarize our views again. First, it is not just a cognitive problem that adversity produces talents, but an objective existence. At all times and all over the world, which outstanding talent did not stand out from all kinds of resistance and finally succeeded? If a Sri Lankan wants to take heaven as his great task, he must first suffer from his mind, his bones and muscles, starve his body, empty his body, and confuse his actions to get what he can't do-Mencius pointed out the only way to become a useful person as early as two thousand years ago. Second, recognize that adversity makes talents, and you can face and overcome any difficulties and obstacles calmly. Third, only by recognizing adversity can we attach importance to the tempering of will quality, and there will be no more such situation as the 97 Sino-Japanese summer camp. Let us remember/kloc-the advice of Saadi, a Persian foreigner in the third century: "If you encounter difficulties, don't be anxious, because the fountain of life often flows out of darkness!"
Pro: I want to point out the other party's omission first: the other party has never answered our question, that is, whether the difficulty is adversity or not, and the ape is not a person, which shows that the talent is not enough. We have expressed our view that prosperity is more conducive to training talents. For example, the investment environment in China is much better than before, so investors come here, which is the prosperity created for us by the chief designer! Imagine if it is adversity, how will investors favor it? What the other party said about frustration education is true, but countries are also trying to run schools better and give students a chance to flourish. Otherwise, why run so many universities? This shows that setbacks are only the second, and prosperity is the fundamental.
There are many important things in one's life. And everything comes from your own status quo. If there is no way, how can we live better? How to pursue other things? Having a career is the guarantee of your life. If you have emotional problems in the future, you won't be at a loss ... if you start your career, you can cultivate your enthusiasm, independence and better sense of responsibility in your work and life ... if you can't even do this basic thing well. Then what capital do we have to think about other things? These are our stated views. So start a career before you get married.
As for the content or something.
You will have it as soon as Baidu checks it.
It's overwhelming I don't want to be bored.
I will talk about this topic based on my debate experience.
I hope it helps you.
The debate focused on the topic.
You see, the focus of this topic lies in a sequence.
The other party is expected to list many benefits of starting a family.
You can get something from it.
The emphasis is on the priority, not the advantages and disadvantages.
Secondly, in terms of time, what is a career?
How much is the business?
For example, you say you are 30 years old and he says you are 40 years old.
Obviously, he has an advantage, so
In your statement, you'd better define your professional standards.
Otherwise, it is easy to be caught by the other party.
30 years old and 40 years old have different definitions, so the tendency of this debate is different.
And the word "industry"
I think it is necessary to have a good discussion.
finally
How to explain that your point of view is correct
Debate games should not revolve around opponents' problems.
The responsibility of the first debate and the fourth debate is to keep a stable mind.
You can refer to Baidu for your reasons or something.
Look at other people's competition manuscripts on this topic.
Look at the positive view and think about how to refute it.
Look at the opponents, those who are more stable.
Hehe, let's call it a day. Let's go