In fact, this kind of question is always fashionable, because the subtext behind it allows the interviewer to know what he wants to know without expressing it. 202 1 How many resumes have you submitted? How many job fairs have you avoided? How many times have you answered this classic question? If you are ignorant and don't know the subtext behind such questions, a good job is not easy to favor you. Let's uncover the da Vinci code behind this classic question!
Q: Can you introduce yourself briefly? Subtext: Do you know others, what experience do you have, and whether this kind of work experience is worth his bid?
The youngest Xiaobai replied: My name is * *, and my resume contains my information.
Zero, holding your resume and asking you to introduce yourself, do you think it is unnecessary? On the other hand, you need to know if you know yourself. Your oral detailed introduction must be focused, and this focus is your evaluation of yourself.
The most boring answer: My name is * *, and I graduated from * * College. Where am I from and what have I done?
2 points, others don't want to know where your native place is. Such a common answer. It's hard for others to think that you have been perfunctory. Give 2 points, because you are too lazy to say what you have done.
The most boring answer: I did ... I did ... I did ... I made as much money for the company as I wanted.
Zero points. The conclusion of expressing contribution always makes the other party afraid to use you, so arrogant, how does your leader manage you? Let others think that the salary you need must be not thin.
Answer: Hello, my name is * * *, and my technical major is * * * *. Only in this way can you work in this kind of company in the industry ... have you ever held this position ... and then tell me your proudest sales performance in one sentence.
Q: What do you think of overtime? Subtext: Are you smart enough to sacrifice your rights and interests for a better job? In fact, it's not just that you have to sacrifice your rights and interests. Overtime is the most easily detected problem.
The most hypocritical answer: I don't care about overtime, I don't care.
Are you sure you can promise? You can't say that if you can't do it. The interviewer can basically confirm that you can't do it.
The most fashionable fool replied: I can try to work during office hours. If you have to or want to work overtime.
It used to be a fashionable answer, but a brave interviewer will know that you are not the smart type and you don't like working overtime very much. You should be prepared to answer them and perfunctory them.
Proposal answer: overtime is a routine, and I can work overtime as long as my job requires.
Q: What do you think of salary? Subtext: Are you satisfied with the salary given by everyone? Will you jump ship for money?
The most hypocritical answer: I don't think money is important, and I won't make too many regulations on salary.
At first glance, it is white. No need to live? False answers can only make the interviewer more afraid of wanting you.
The stupidest answer: How much salary do you offer?
There is nothing wrong with asking about salary, but asking immediately in a place like this can only make the interviewer feel that you don't understand the market and don't value money.
Suggested answer: salary depends on my contribution to the company, and the assessment index is my exam results at work.
Q: Why did you leave your previous company? Subtext: Where is the moral bottom line you can bear and what will make you leave? And this kind of thing is not the concern of the company.
The stupidest answer: before the company gossip, such as the salary is not very good.
That kind of answer is definitely taboo, and it is very easy for people to think that you are complaining. Generally, this kind of person has a low tolerance for work pressure.
The most fatal answer: interpersonal communication is not very good, such as meeting your company or friends and not getting along well.
There is no doubt, pass, who wants to recruit a person with a bad character? This answer is to expose one's own shortcomings.
Proposal answer: The original company is far from home, and your traffic area is very suitable for my situation.
Q: Why did you interview for this position? Subtext: What can this assignment offer you? Does your evaluation of this task conform to the actual effect that the company wants to achieve?
The stupidest answer: your company is a company with strong comprehensive strength, and this position is also my favorite.
You don't have to pay attention to the advantages and disadvantages of the company. You obviously missed your pulse. What the interviewer wants to know is what you can offer this position, not what this position can give you.
The most arrogant answer: because I can serve.
The interviewer will tell you whether he can get the position. It's not up to you. What the interviewer wants to hear is the actual content.
Suggested answer: express your expectations first, and then tell your advantages. The key to the future is what you want to do after interviewing for this position and what you can do for the company.
Q: Do you know our company? Subtext: How much do you want this position? If you know our company well and have a high evaluation, it proves that you are looking forward to this position and will do well.
The most evasive answer: I've heard of it a little, it seems.
Like? If you don't know the company you are interviewing for, the interviewer will think that you are just submitting your resume online. You don't even know the company you want to join, which proves that you are insincere.
Suggested answer: Tell me about the best side of the company you have mastered, and the interviewers agree with it, which makes them very happy and adds a lot of points.
Q: Finally, what kind of questions do you want to ask? Subtext: Do you pay attention to this job and attach great importance to it?
The most evasive answer: no problem. That's right, which means you don't pay much attention to what you don't care about or don't want to master in this job?
General answer: related working hours, salary and treatment, and more importantly, the analysis of the current operation situation and the expectations of its company.