Luo Ziru, who won?

This should be a lose-lose, but I think Wang Ziru has an advantage now. Why do you say that? We can roughly start from both sides. First of all, 1, Luo Yonghao definitely won the debate, and Wang Ziru was completely suppressed in the gas field. But because it keeps interrupting others, it gives many people a rude feeling, at least this is reduced for most people. Look at the media at that time, Sina, Phoenix, Sohu, Netease, and there were many people on both sides. As for Luo's refusal to let others talk, he was really criticized by many people. 2. Luo's positive answer to Wang's question is incomplete, and many people admit that it doesn't matter, which is fatal to the hammer. Think about it, claiming to be the best mobile phone in the Eastern Hemisphere. As a result, he also admitted that it was not resistant to falling, and the screen color difference and brightness were not as big as those of Apple Samsung. Isn't this hitting yourself in the face? The argument is to show that there is nothing wrong with the mobile phone, but Luo came to me directly with a question. How do you make me feel? Obviously inappropriate. 3。 Hammer here is real money to sell things, Wang is to evaluate and sell services. You are an entrepreneur who quarrels with commentators. He lost popularity, but no one watched. Entrepreneurs lose popularity, but not a little bit. So generally speaking, the original purpose of this Romanian debate is to save its own consumers, but now it has become Wang Ziru's subjective failure. I think the purpose of the beginning is not good.

Approach the king. 1 This incident shows that Lei Jun owns shares in Wang's company, accounting for 25%. Wang himself said that this stock has no influence, but we don't know if it has any influence. Luo thinks this is fatal, but in fact, he can't answer much. Why? Think about it. Ann Bunny is also Lei Jun's company, but has it affected many mobile phone enthusiasts to participate in running? Or many people like to escape, why? If neither of us is a Xiaomi user, what about running? So, although Wang's comments are not enough to explain the problem, with so many comments on Youku, users will definitely read more. The more you read, the more problems you will naturally find. Even if you read the comments on the IPHONE, many people will say there is something wrong. Consumers are actually blind, the product may be good, but more people can't say it well, and naturally they will feel guilty. A lot of information about Wang is confidential. Your evaluation should at least be standard. It is obviously inappropriate for you to evaluate other people's mobile phones without telling everyone how to rate them. But if you look at the evaluation, careful people will find that many of his data are compared with the high-end flagships of Samsung, lg and htc of Apple, and there are almost no domestic brands. Luo himself said that it was not as good as Apple Samsung, which confirmed the evaluation results. So Wang played a clever trick on this point. Even if I wanted to say that you are not as good as Xiaomi, I wouldn't compare you directly. I called a group of bosses to crush you. I don't care whether Xiaomi is used or not, at least you don't think so, so it can be said that it is a lose-lose situation.

So in general, from Luo's mouth, we can know that Wang is not independent. Maybe he is a dog, but what Luo shows us is also extremely rude.

Wang said that Luo's mobile phone is not good, and Luo said that I can't, because everyone can't. I am only worse than Samsung Apple.

Luo said that Wang's evaluation was unfair, but Luo himself said that I gave you money to evaluate, and you ended up like this. Do you have integrity? On the other hand, Luo himself indirectly explained that he was also spending money on evaluation.

But look at the difference between Wang and Luo. As a commentator, it doesn't matter if you lose. You have a thick skin.

An entrepreneur who loses his mobile phone and can't sell it is basically gg.

Who can't afford to lose is clear at a glance. Besides, you and a commentator are so arrogant that everyone is watching. Now many comments are coming one after another. It is estimated that more and more problems with hammer mobile phones will be reported. How embarrassing this is. Obviously, it is not worth the loss.

In addition, Wang recently tested the hammer mobile phone in Moore Lab. 1m falls, 5 hammers and 4 hammers fail.

Luo did not respond, but some people in Weibo said that Wang set his own standards and tampered with the national standard, pointing out that the national standard was 0.5 meters. I want to say that people in Weibo have ulterior motives. Why do you say that? According to the national standard, the off screen of the mobile phone is 1 m, and the on state is 0.5 m. And Wang's evaluation is in a state of power failure. This Weibo native only quoted the second half sentence, took it out of context, and deleted the first sentence. What is the difference between this method and Wang?

Handmade, please give points.