For example, when I applied for the study agency of American graduate schools, several large institutions that just started consulting (I think most students started consulting from large institutions) said that they could apply for various countries to show their "strength". Maybe some students and parents are quite capable when they hear it, and they are very convincing because of their large scale and loud complaints. But if you think about it carefully, you will find that once the applicant country does a lot, it will be very complicated and not in-depth. This is a high probability event. At the same time, no matter which country we choose, there are only a few late teachers who really serve us. The choice we need to make is actually to choose the strength level of the later teachers. What we need is that you can help me understand and apply more deeply when I apply for studying in the United States, and it will be OK to get my dream school.
There are many branches, many countries applying, and many people in our company. To put it bluntly, it is a gimmick to attract students. When I applied for graduate students in the United States, I paid more attention to the measurement of the concentration of study abroad agents. I still think there will be fewer countries that have done more in-depth and professional work in this field. Later, I compared online, looked up information and signed Huide. His family focuses on applications from the United States and Britain, so I don't have to worry. Moreover, I have also compared all kinds of study agents on the recruitment website, mainly considering the professional ability of teachers in the later period. It also made me subvert my previous views on some big intermediaries. The big intermediary who thought it was good before had a low threshold for recruiting teachers in the later stage, even college students who just graduated. . . . (speechless. jpg)