Provisions on major administrative decision-making procedures in Jilin Province

Chapter I General Provisions Article 1 In order to improve the scientific, democratic and legal decision-making mechanism, standardize major administrative decision-making procedures, improve decision-making quality and efficiency, and clarify decision-making responsibilities, these Provisions are formulated in accordance with the Provisional Regulations on Major Administrative Decision-making Procedures and in light of the actual situation of this province. Article 2 These Provisions shall apply to the formulation and adjustment procedures of major administrative decisions of the people's governments at or above the county level in this province (hereinafter referred to as decision-making organs). Article 3 Decision-making organs shall, in accordance with the provisions of Article 3 of the Provisional Regulations on Major Administrative Decision-making Procedures, determine the catalogue and standards of major administrative decision-making matters (hereinafter referred to as decision-making matters) in combination with their functions and powers and local conditions, announce them to the public with the consent of Party committees at the same level, and make adjustments according to actual conditions. Article 4 The overall leadership of the Party must be upheld and strengthened in major administrative decisions.

To make major administrative decisions, we should follow the principles of scientific decision-making, democratic decision-making and decision-making according to law, adapt to the requirements of economic and social development and comprehensively deepen reform, ensure that the people participate in decision-making through various channels and forms, and ensure that the decision-making content conforms to laws, regulations and rules.

When making major administrative decisions, we should pay equal attention to decision-making quality and efficiency, avoid formalism, and correctly perform relevant procedures according to the specific circumstances of decision-making matters. Article 5 The general office (office) of the decision-making organ shall be responsible for promoting, guiding, coordinating and supervising the major administrative decision-making work in its own administrative region and the daily work of the decision-making organ related to major administrative decisions, and perform the following duties:

(a) to guide the major administrative decision-making work of the lower administrative organs;

(two) to study and draft the catalogue and standards of decision-making matters;

(three) suggestions, initiatives, discussions and adjustments for decision-making matters;

(four) to study and formulate the list of materials for submitting the draft decision to the decision-making organ;

(five) to study and draft supervision measures for major administrative decisions of lower administrative organs, and organize their implementation after approval by the decision-making organs;

(six) to study and formulate the management system of expert database for decision-making consultation and demonstration, and be responsible for the establishment and operation management of expert database;

(seven) other duties as prescribed by the decision-making organ. Article 6 Citizens, legal persons and other organizations have the right to supervise the major administrative decision-making work of administrative organs and make criticisms and suggestions. Chapter II Formation of Draft Decision-making Article 7 Where the decision-making organ designates relevant units to study and demonstrate suggestions on decision-making matters, it shall specify the time limit for completion.

The unit responsible for investigation and demonstration shall form an investigation and demonstration report within the prescribed time limit, and put forward suggestions on whether to start the decision-making process and its reasons and basis. Eighth decision-making organs decided to start the decision-making process, can be made by notice, leadership instructions and other means. Ninth decision-making units to prepare the draft decision time, generally not more than three months; If it cannot be completed within three months due to special circumstances, it shall explain the reasons to the decision-making organ and put forward the time limit that needs to be extended. Article 10 When drafting a draft decision, the decision-making undertaking unit shall solicit the opinions of the departments of the decision-making organs, the people's governments at lower levels and other units involved in decision-making matters in writing.

There are big differences, the decision-making undertaking unit shall fully negotiate with the relevant units; If no consensus can be reached through consultation, it can be reported to the leadership of the decision-making organ for coordination and form a handling opinion. Eleventh decision-making units to make cost-benefit analysis and prediction of decision-making matters, should grasp the comprehensive information, use scientific methods, make objective conclusions, and form an analysis and prediction report. The analysis and forecast report shall include basic information and sources, analysis and forecast methods and processes, analysis and forecast conclusions and their impact on decision-making matters. Twelfth decision-making matters are closely related to the production and operation of enterprises, and the decision-making undertaking unit shall fully listen to the opinions of relevant enterprises and industry organizations by holding symposiums and soliciting opinions in writing. Thirteenth decision-making matters to solicit opinions from the public, the decision-making undertaking unit shall publicly explain the adoption of public opinions. Article 14 The hearing on decision-making matters shall be held in public, with the permission of auditing and news reporting, except those that are not made public according to law. Fifteenth decision-making units held a hearing, it shall form a hearing report.

The hearing report shall include the basic information of the hearing, the main opinions of the participants in the hearing, the adoption of opinions and the reasons. Sixteenth decision-making units can choose experts and professional organizations to organize expert argumentation from institutions of higher learning, scientific research institutions, social organizations, management departments and other units. Seventeenth experts to participate in the demonstration should include industry experts and legal experts, mainly industry experts.

The professional expertise of industry experts and professional institutions participating in the demonstration shall be consistent with the decision-making matters, and have certain authority and representativeness in this professional field.

If the decision-making matters involve multiple professional fields, experts and professional institutions in the corresponding professional fields should be selected to participate in the demonstration. Eighteenth decision-making units shall summarize and analyze the opinions of experts, and form an expert demonstration report.

The expert demonstration report shall include the basic information of the experts and professional institutions involved in the demonstration, the methods and processes of the demonstration, the opinions of experts, the adoption of opinions and reasons, etc. Nineteenth risk assessment, should focus on the assessment of the implementation of the decision in social stability, ecological environment, finance, public safety and other aspects of the risk.