1, improve the quality of decision makers. First of all, we should improve our political and ideological quality. Leading cadres should first talk about politics and establish a correct world outlook, outlook on life and values. Only in this way can they adhere to the scientific decision-making attitude of thorough materialism under the complicated and changeable situation. Second, we should improve the scientific and cultural level. In the process of leadership decision-making, the higher the level of scientific and cultural knowledge, the deeper the understanding of objective laws, and the more the unity of subject and object can be realized. Therefore, leading cadres should not only have a profound professional knowledge base, but also understand the knowledge of neighboring disciplines and marginal sciences, and strive to shape themselves into generalists and lay a solid foundation for scientific decision-making.
2. Strict administrative decision-making procedures. Administrative decision-making is a process, which needs strict procedures to control in order to produce scientific decision-making. The first is to speed up the legislation of administrative procedures. In China's current laws and regulations, although there are some legal norms on administrative procedures, they are only limited to a few areas such as administrative litigation and administrative punishment. On the whole, the legislation of administrative procedure is seriously lagging behind, and most administrative acts are not legalized. The legalized procedure is more or less incomplete, disjointed, cumbersome and conflicting. We should speed up the legislation of administrative procedures in accordance with the principle of decentralization before reunification. The second is to strengthen the awareness of decision-making procedures. As a leader, when making decisions, we should have a strong sense of procedure, strive to do every decision meticulously according to legal procedures, and avoid making mistakes because of the arbitrariness of decision-making. The third is to make decisions strictly through democratic procedures. Before making major decisions, the chief executive needs to go through certain consultation procedures, fully solicit and respect the opinions of other members of the team, and fully solicit the opinions of the masses, experts and other sectors of society. The fourth is to go deep into grassroots investigation and research. Investigation and research is the beginning of leadership work and a basic skill of leaders. As a leader, before making a decision, we should go deep into the grass-roots investigation and study, understand the truth and seek scientific methods to solve problems.
3. Improve the administrative decision-making mechanism. The first is to establish a supervision and restriction mechanism for administrative decision-making power. Adhere to the principles of legality, science, democracy, openness and efficiency, establish and improve the ideological and moral restraint mechanism, legal restraint mechanism and mass participation supervision mechanism, speed up the establishment of an administrative power operation mechanism with reasonable structure, scientific allocation, strict procedures and effective restraint, give full play to the supervisory role of specialized agencies, and gradually establish and improve the strong supervision and restraint of the organic combination of specialized agency supervision with NPC legal supervision, CPPCC democratic supervision, mass supervision and public opinion supervision. The second is to establish an administrative decision-making audit evaluation system. Strengthen the audit and evaluation of administrative decision-making, decision-making and decision-making implementation. Carry out auditing, scientific decision-making and evaluation index system in an all-round way according to law to ensure that administrative decision-making pays attention to economic benefits as well as political and social benefits. The third is to standardize and improve the accountability system of administrative decision-making. In combination with the requirements of the target management of the Party committee and government and the responsibility system for building a clean and honest government, we will constantly standardize and improve the accountability system for administrative decision-making and implement the accountability system for decision-making mistakes.
Fourth, improve the administrative decision-making mechanism of cities and counties.
1, to further clarify the decision-making authority of the government and departments. Because the decision-making authority of the government and departments is not clear enough in operation, sometimes things that should be decided by the government become ultra vires or decided by the government. In order to clarify the decision-making authority of the government and departments, so that they can make decisions according to law, it is necessary to clarify the decision-making authority of the government and departments, and to clarify which matters are decided by the government and which matters are decided by the departments, so as to prevent some decisions from being divorced from government decisions and departmental decisions.
2, to further clarify the scope and form of major government decisions. City and county governments should be clear about what matters belong to major decisions. On the basis of in-depth investigation and study, extensive listening to opinions and full argumentation, major issues with basic, strategic and overall situation that need government decision-making must be discussed and decided collectively by the plenary meeting or executive meeting of the government.
3, further strict government administrative decision-making procedures. Strict procedures and compliance with procedures are the prerequisites for ensuring scientific decision-making. Establish and implement four systems: first, the review system of administrative decision-making items. If the government needs to make decisions, the decision-making unit shall first apply to the government for project approval, explaining the purpose, necessity and main basis of the decision-making matters. The second is the expert consultation and demonstration system of government decision-making. Decision-making on major issues and major engineering projects and decisions involving the vital interests of the masses shall be submitted to experts for consultation and demonstration. The third is the social publicity system of decision-making scheme and the hearing system of administrative decision-making. Except for confidential decision-making, it should be made public all the time, listen to the suggestions of the masses and accept social supervision. In terms of social publicity, it is necessary to clarify the scope and principles of social publicity in the form of system, determine the specific departments and supervision departments responsible for social publicity, and stipulate the specific procedures, contents and methods of social publicity. The fourth is the comparison system of various decision-making schemes. There should be more than two plans for major decisions. In principle, no decision should be made without putting forward multiple plans. The advantages and disadvantages of different decision-making schemes should be analyzed and evaluated fairly and objectively, and demonstration meetings attended by various institutions and professionals should be organized if conditions permit, so that the decision-making demonstration can be based on comparative identification.
4. Further expand public participation in administrative decision-making. At present, departmental interests are an important reason that affects the fairness of government decision-making. Therefore, in administrative decision-making, we must pay attention to prevent and avoid the tendency of government power being departmentalized, departmental power being benefited, departmental interests being inflated and legalized, especially to change the phenomenon that "the upper situation is explained by the department, the lower situation is reported by the department, and the plan is designed by the department, and the result is tilted towards departmental interests" in administrative decision-making, and to change the situation that only one voice is heard and only one plan is talked about. The most effective way to change these conditions is to expand public participation in administrative decision-making, enhance the transparency of decision-making and promote the democratization of decision-making. All major issues concerning the overall economic and social development, the government should listen to the opinions of all sectors of society, hold regular contact meetings with NPC deputies and CPPCC members, fully listen to the opinions of NPC deputies and CPPCC members, and consciously accept supervision; All major issues involving the vital interests of the administrative counterpart should also be made public and held a hearing to listen to opinions and suggestions.
5, the formation of government decision-making consulting expert database, the implementation of major decision-making expert consultation and demonstration system. Inviting experts from related industries to participate in major professional and technical decision-making matters in economic construction and social development, and conducting expert argumentation, technical consultation and decision-making evaluation is an important way of scientific decision-making. Strengthen the construction of decision-making consulting talents, select from all units (including party and government organs, enterprises and institutions, mass organizations and universities), select experts who are representative and authoritative in their professional fields, and form a city and county government decision-making consulting expert database composed of 10 experts in economy, law and administration. For major decisions that need expert argumentation, 3-5 experts are randomly selected from the expert database to form an expert group, and independent investigation and research are carried out on the matters to be decided, and expert argumentation opinions or decision-making plans are put forward for the decision-making reference of the city and county governments. At the same time, policy research consulting institutions should contact experts and scholars extensively, and city and county governments should also hire some authoritative and influential celebrities as government decision-making consultants, establish an "external brain system" for government decision-making, and gradually form various forms of decision-making consulting mechanisms.
6, establish and improve the legitimacy of major administrative decisions. In order to improve the legal level of government decision-making and prevent illegal decision-making, the Outline stipulates that major administrative decisions should be demonstrated in the decision-making process. For this reason, on the one hand, it is suggested that the municipal and county governments should formulate the legal argumentation procedures for major decision-making matters as soon as possible, formulate normative documents such as decisions and orders that are universally binding on the government, determine major government investment projects, dispose of major or important state-owned assets, sign economic contracts in the name of the government, perform other important legal matters when the government performs its economic adjustment function, market supervision, social management and public services, and clearly stipulate that it must first pass legal argumentation or review by the government legal department to prevent ultra vires. On the other hand, it is necessary to strengthen the construction of government legal institutions and give full play to the role of staff assistants and legal advisers of government legal institutions.
7, the establishment of administrative decision-making effect tracking feedback mechanism. First, implement the tracking and feedback system for decision-making, focusing on tracking whether the decision is carried out to the letter, whether there are new situations and problems, and whether it is necessary to adjust and correct the decision. The second is to establish a social evaluation mechanism for decision-making effectiveness. Taking the satisfaction of the masses as the fundamental criterion for evaluating the effectiveness of decision-making, the public evaluation mechanism is introduced, and the information feedback after administrative decision-making is widely collected, so that mistakes in decision-making can be found and corrected in time according to all aspects of information feedback. Third, according to the principle of "who makes decisions and who is responsible", establish a system of accountability for decision-making to ensure the consistency of powers and responsibilities. For decision-making behaviors that exceed legal authority, violate legal procedures, and harm the legitimate rights and interests of the state, the collective and citizens, the responsibility of the decision-maker should be investigated to avoid the arbitrariness of administrative decision-making.
Scientific decision-making is the basis of doing all the work well, the premise of promoting administration according to law and plays a decisive role in economic and social development. To improve the administrative decision-making mechanism and truly bring administrative decision-making into the track of standardization, institutionalization and legalization, we should take the opportunity of studying and practicing Scientific Outlook on Development to speed up the process of administration according to law and promote the harmonious development of economy and society.