The 65-year-old man in Wuhan insisted on asking his ex-boyfriend for the breakup fee 24 years ago, because when he broke up with his ex-boyfriend, his ex-boyfriend did harm to himself and promised to pay 20,000 yuan and 7 grams of gold ring, but when he broke up, his boyfriend had no money to pay, so he wrote an iou to the old man with a pencil and promised to repay it, but he never fulfilled it. The old man then took his ex-boyfriend to court and applied for compulsory execution.
After the court accepted the case, it was found that the ex-boyfriend had no property to execute at all, so things had to be shelved. Later, when his parents died, the old man left a fortune. The old man thought that the property should be inherited by his ex-boyfriend, so he applied to the court for enforcement again and asked his ex-boyfriend to repay the breakup fee. But the house left by her parents was inherited by her brother. The court can only solve this problem through mediation.
After many mediations, the younger brother of the ex-boyfriend promised to pay the old man's breakup fee instead of his brother, and asked the old man to tear up the debt. Finally, the younger brother of the ex-boyfriend paid the old man a breakup fee of 53,600 yuan. Many people think that the old man is a little too persistent in asking for the breakup fee, and most people can't get it. In fact, there is a certain reason for this. When the old man broke up with his ex-boyfriend, his ex-boyfriend promised to pay him compensation, but he never fulfilled it, which is why he insisted on asking for it.
The old man persisted for 24 years in order to ask for a breakup fee. He didn't say why there was a breakup fee when he broke up. From now on, it may be that this breakup fee was paid when he was getting along with his boyfriend, and his boyfriend's behavior did harm to his spirit and body in the process of communication. This money is a reasonable and legal compensation. Since the old man has an iou written by his boyfriend, it is reasonable and legal to recover it according to law. There is no need to make a fuss. We should look at this problem from a rational point of view.