"Adaptive cruise is too pit!" In Jiaxing, Zhejiang Province, Mr. Yu bought a new energy vehicle and wanted to sneak away on the high speed, so he started the adaptive cruise function. Unexpectedly, when he was driving the vehicle, he deviated from the course, and Mr. Yu quickly slammed the direction to correct it. As a result, he changed too much. The vehicle lost control instantly, rotated 90 degrees and hit the high-speed guardrail. People are fine, but the vehicle is scrapped and the guardrail is deformed. # Dawu's legal observation # # Legal popularization action-lawyers come to help # This is an ordinary unilateral traffic accident, and the legal responsibility is very clear. Mr. Yu is mainly responsible for the accident and needs to bear all the losses. Including vehicle loss and guardrail loss, if Yu Xiansheng bought car damage insurance, he can get full compensation, and he can get a new car after getting compensation. If there is no car damage insurance, he can only bear the loss himself. The loss of guardrail shall be paid by compulsory insurance first, and the part exceeding 2000 yuan shall be paid by commercial insurance. Yu Xiansheng, I have been waiting for this new energy vehicle for three or four months, and I have just been licensed for half a month. This is a brand-new car. This car is equipped with an adaptive cruise system. The vehicle has its own set of logic to control the driving state of the vehicle, which partially replaces the driver's operation. So, after the accident, is it all the driver's responsibility? At present, the identification of traffic accident liability only includes drivers, passengers and pedestrians, but it poses a challenge to smart cars with automatic driving function. This is not only a traffic accident dispute, but also a product quality dispute. The driver is the direct infringer, but the manufacturer is the product manufacturer and seller, so the legal relationship becomes more responsible. 1 in August, 2008, Shenzhen issued relevant management regulations, and tried and discussed the accident liability division of vehicles under the state of automatic driving. In the regulations, different schemes are given according to the level of autonomous driving. In L3 or L4, the driver is the first responsible person, while in L5, the owner and manager of the vehicle are liable for compensation without manual operation at all, in short, the owner and driver. The adaptive cruise function started by teacher Yu is a relatively primary automatic driving function, mainly to control the speed and keep the distance between cars. As a driver, he still has to control the direction. He swerved when he found the car off track. It can be seen that he is too lazy to drive the highway. Even if Yu Xiansheng is responsible according to the new regulations issued by Shenzhen, it is hard to say that it is the quality defect of the car. After the accident, Mr. Yu blamed the adaptive cruise function for being too pit and a little too difficult for engineers. If you really want to be lazy, you still need L5 autopilot. Wait, it won't be long before it is realized. Follow me @ 丮丮丮丮丮丮丮丮丮丮丮丮丮丮丮丮丮丮丮丮丮丮丮丮2001
(Photo/Text/Photo: Pacific Auto Network Q&A called Beast)