Parents should treat their children with the meat on their palms. Fairness is fairness. Whoever has a better life can volunteer more, but this is not a name. All parents' property was given to their son, and all parents were borne by his son. This is a social phenomenon. Parents should serve their sick daughters and give gifts to their bereaved daughters. Your in-laws and your parents are equal because they gave birth to your wife.
Filial piety is necessary and necessary! You have the ability to give more, but you have no ability to do what you can. But it is your responsibility and obligation to respect them. Personally, I think that giving and receiving are equal. As long as you pay, God will take care of you and you will do things smoothly. And supporting parents, including in-laws, does not necessarily require anything in return. Why did your father-in-law give you real estate? Are you his son or adopted? As the saying goes, marry a woman and splash water. Your father-in-law is your family, and your own side is your husband's family. You are a guest at home, you know? Remember filial piety. Let me ask you a question, too. Do you need to demolish your mother's house?
Empathy, I really don't like people like you who only look at family property and are not filial. Not spray you. It's just that you and your wife are guests of your parents-in-law. Remember, their son over there is their family.
First of all, daughters have the right to inherit. Habits and customs can't replace laws. Inheriting property and supporting the elderly are the rights and obligations stipulated by law! Secondly, the son-in-law has no obligation to support her parents-in-law, only the obligation to help! Legally speaking, all children have the right of inheritance and the obligation to support their parents. Look what you're talking about. You said this problem should be considered separately. It is the father-in-law's freedom to leave money to his son! Then why don't you mention the legal right of inheritance? Daughters and sons-in-law have the obligation to take care of the elderly!
Why do you only speak from the legal level? Isn't it wonderful that you think separately? In a word, if the son-in-law has the ability, he will give a hand, and if he has no ability, he will give a little help to express his mind. If the property is given to his son, he will certainly find him. The daughter can't get the property, but she still has certain support obligations. If she goes to the hospital to look after her efforts, the son-in-law can choose some expenses or not according to the actual situation of the family. There's no need to struggle so much. Many people just like to complicate simple problems, mix up many things they don't want to do, and finally make themselves have a headache.
It can't be said that the old feudal concept of raising children to prevent old age must be wrong. You'll know when you have a son and a daughter. You have to admit that most old people live with their sons! Why? Your parents-in-law have lived in their own places all their lives. You can't say that you are old and want to sell your ancestors to live with your son-in-law! As the saying goes, after all, no old man wants to live in his own place. Being with a son-in-law is definitely less than being with a son. Under normal circumstances, no matter the elderly or other young adults, they are independent natural persons in law and bear independent civil and criminal responsibilities, so they have to bear all the necessary expenses. Children, as caregivers, need to bear the same support obligations, mainly economic support, life care and spiritual comfort.
But there is a premise to bear the medical expenses: the elderly with financial difficulties. All the property was given to the son. Unless the house has been transferred and all assets have completed fair procedures such as gift, transfer and inheritance stipulated by law, the existing assets are legally regarded as owned by the in-laws. Unless the existing assets are insufficient to pay for medical expenses after liquidation. Otherwise, according to the individual who has civil criminal responsibility, the natural person who has the ability to bear medical expenses should bear his own civil liability, that is, medical expenses. If the elders have lost their capacity for civil and criminal responsibility, children can freeze and liquidate their property for medical expenses according to law, or they can inherit property according to the right of inheritance in the future. So if it's time to use legal weapons, don't mention it. Just get a lawyer to file a lawsuit. The obligation to support is not unlimited, just like raising a child. Children may not support medical expenses if the parties have no financial difficulties.
If your father-in-law needs money to see a doctor, do you have the obligation to pay? This sentence does not conform to the law. The law stipulates that the daughter has the obligation to support, and the son-in-law has no obligation to support. So this matter is a two-tier relationship in law. The father-in-law's request for medical treatment is related to his daughter and has nothing to do with whether he is assigned to family property. As for whether the daughter will pay or not, it is the relationship and problem between the son-in-law and the husband and wife. This difficulty lies in her daughter's attitude and thoughts. She needs to consider the relationship between parents, the relationship between husband and children.
1, as a wife, a daughter should consider whether to hurt her family and her husband's heart, and whether her parents-in-law will pay the same money if she is sick in the future. 2. As a child, whether it hurts parents' heart or not is the education and care given to her by her family when she grows up. As a mother, she should consider setting an example for her children, and how she takes care of her parents' in-laws, and her children will follow suit in the future. Finally, how to deal with this matter, the son-in-law should first listen to his wife's opinion, whether it can be done or not, and be justified. Husband and wife * * * use property, how much money, the premise to consider is that the brother-in-law has obtained the father-in-law's property, and the amount is agreed according to the actual situation of the family. If the family can't afford it, it should be agreed that the in-laws will want the same amount in the future. To be filial to the elderly, we must set an example for our children that both parents should be filial.
Many people take the law as an example, which is ridiculous. First of all, the object of support is to raise rather than inherit property. Simply put, as long as your parents raise you, you have the obligation to support you. As for real estate, parents can give it to their sons, daughters and even strangers. This is everyone's right to control his own property. Because of the unfair distribution of property, psychological imbalance is understandable, but if you refuse to support and help, it is definitely a family style problem. In ancient times, daughters married according to custom poured water for the benefit of their husband's family and had no obligation to support the elderly. That's weird. Why do you take tradition for your son and law for your son? This is selective inheritance?
If there are loopholes in the law, it should be changed. If parents do not treat the distribution of inheritance fairly according to the law, the maintenance obligation should be adjusted in proportion, rather than artificially creating unfairness. In China, especially in rural areas, it is a fact that sons inherit most of the property, and it is also a fact that sons are mainly responsible for providing for the elderly. When there is a serious illness, the son will generally be fully responsible if he has the ability. Of course, the daughter also has the obligation to bear part of it to help her brother reduce the burden. As for how much money the daughter will pay, we can discuss it. In another case, if children's abilities and conditions are very different, a large part of China's families are rich and contribute, not evenly distributed, which should be related to the cultural genes of China people.