1, self-taught. The undertaker shall conduct confidential examination of the information to be disclosed, put forward preliminary examination opinions, and report it to the competent department of information disclosure examination or the designated examiner for examination.
2. review. The department or personnel responsible for confidentiality review shall, according to the scope involving state secrets, work secrets, business secrets and personal privacy, review the information to be disclosed, put forward opinions on whether it can be made public, and report it to the competent leaders of organs and units for examination and approval.
3. Final review. The competent leaders of organs and units shall make a decision on whether or not to approve the disclosure. Information that can be made public shall be sent to an information disclosure institution for disclosure.
4. Submit to trial. If an organ or unit is not clear about whether the relevant information can be made public, it shall report it to the relevant competent department at a higher level or the secrecy administrative department at the same level for examination and approval, but it shall not be made public without the approval of the relevant organ.
5. Submit to trial. Information belonging to state secrets to be disclosed by superiors or other organs at the same level and information that has not been disclosed must be examined and approved by the information generating organ, and shall not be disclosed without approval. However, due to the needs of the work, the higher authorities may disclose the information that has not been disclosed by the lower authorities after conducting a confidentiality review.
6. Decryption review. If a government agency considers it necessary to disclose the state secret information that is still within the confidentiality period, it shall first decrypt it according to law, and then conduct a confidentiality review to determine whether it can be disclosed. If the state secrets whose confidentiality period expires need to be made public, the organs and units shall conduct a review in accordance with the confidentiality review procedures to determine whether they can be made public.
Organs and units that publicly release information shall establish corresponding confidentiality review mechanisms, follow the principle of "who publicly reviews", review in advance and according to law, and strictly implement the work procedures of self-examination by information providing departments, special review by information disclosure institutions and approval by competent leaders. If it is uncertain whether it involves state secrets, it shall be reported to the superior competent department or the secrecy administrative department at the same level for determination. Organs and units should strengthen the organization and leadership of the confidentiality review of publicly released information, implement the undertaker and responsible personnel, standardize the review procedures, and strengthen supervision and management.
First, the subject of confidentiality review
Units that intend to disclose information shall establish and improve the confidentiality review mechanism for government information release, and designate personnel familiar with confidentiality laws and regulations and related confidentiality scope, with confidentiality knowledge and relevant business experience as confidentiality reviewers.
Second, the basis of confidentiality review
1, secrecy law and its implementation measures;
2. Provisions on the specific scope of state secrets and their classification and related explanations;
3. Information determined to be confidential or unsuitable for disclosure;
4. Other laws and regulations formulated by the state.
Three. Confidentiality review procedure
The confidentiality review is conducted in written form, which can be put forward by the information generation institution and synchronized with the approval of government information disclosure.
1, the government information generation agency puts forward the preliminary opinion on whether to make it public;
2, the government information disclosure agencies put forward audit opinions;
3, the person in charge of the administrative organ or the authorized person for approval.
The confidentiality review process must be recorded in writing. Mainly record the following contents: the title or abstract of the information being reviewed; Review basis; Confidentiality review conclusions or handling opinions; The signature and date of the inspector, the auditor, the person in charge of the organ or the authorized person; Other contents that should be recorded.
The confidentiality review shall be completed within the time limit stipulated in the Regulations on the Openness of Government Information.
Legal basis:
Regulations of People's Republic of China (PRC) Municipality on the Openness of Government Information Article 1 These Regulations are formulated for the purpose of ensuring citizens, legal persons and other organizations to obtain government information according to law, improving the transparency of government work, building a government ruled by law, and giving full play to the service role of government information in people's production, life and economic and social activities.
Article 8 People's governments at all levels shall strengthen the standardization and informatization management of government information resources, strengthen the construction of online government information disclosure platform, promote the integration of government information disclosure platform and government service platform, and improve the online processing level of government information disclosure.