Article 1 The confidentiality review of information disclosure refers to the whole process of administrative activities in which the party and government organs screen whether the information to be disclosed is confidential according to the Regulations on the Openness of Government Information and the Secrecy Law before information disclosure, so as to confirm whether the information should be disclosed.
Article 2 The management mechanism of information disclosure and confidentiality review is implemented, in which the main leaders of the Party and government are the first responsible persons, the leaders in charge of organization and coordination are responsible for leadership, the responsible departments are responsible for implementing specific responsibilities, the specially invited examiners are responsible for checking, and the secrecy administrative department is responsible for guidance and supervision.
Article 3 All organs and units shall establish and improve the confidentiality review mechanism for government information release, clarify the basis, procedures, post responsibilities and reward and punishment measures for the confidentiality review of information disclosure of their own organs and units, determine the leaders in charge, clarify the responsible departments and designate reviewers.
Fourth government information disclosure examiners are responsible for the daily confidential review and submission of information disclosure; Define state secrets according to authorization and decide whether relevant information can be made public; Log on to relevant websites and webpages in time, check the relevant information released by this organ (unit), and take remedial measures in time if confidential information is found.
Article 5 All organs and units shall, in accordance with the Secrecy Law, the Regulations on the Openness of Government Information, the Provisions on the Specific Scope of State Secrets and Their Classification and the Santai County Secrecy Regulations issued by the State Secrecy Bureau in conjunction with relevant departments of the central government, make a list of confidential matters of their own organs and units, which shall serve as the basis for the confidentiality review of information disclosure.
Article 6 The disclosure and confidentiality review of government information of various organs and units shall be conducted in accordance with three procedures: preliminary examination, review and approval.
1. First instance. The drafters (producers) and offices of information documents of government agencies and units shall be responsible for the implementation. The main content of the preliminary examination is to examine the necessity, accuracy, information source and disclosure method, and whether it involves state secrets, work secrets, business secrets and personal privacy, that is, its legitimacy, information format and quality. And review the accuracy of the classification of government information that is exempt from disclosure and the standardization of the confidentiality period.
2. review. The government information disclosure institutions of government organs and units and their responsible persons shall be responsible for the preliminary examination results, and find out the attributes that should be disclosed and the reasons and basis for not disclosing them; The leaders in charge should make an inspection and review of the audited units.
3. recognition. The competent leaders of organs and units or the personnel responsible for classified work shall be responsible for making the preliminary examination opinions and examination opinions public. The approver shall bear the leadership responsibility for the final result of the confidentiality review of government information disclosure.
Article 7 The process and conclusion of confidentiality review shall be recorded in written form and kept properly. The contents of the record shall include the name, carrier form, disclosure method, disclosure date, content summary, preliminary examination opinions, audit opinions and approval date (the confidentiality review form of government information disclosure and original materials shall be filed for future reference).
Article 8 When an organ or unit is not sure whether the information to be disclosed can be disclosed, it shall submit it to the relevant competent department or the State Secrecy Bureau at the county level for examination and determination in accordance with relevant laws, regulations and relevant provisions of the state. Whether it is a state secret or not and what kind of classification it belongs to is controversial, and it shall be reported to the county State Secrecy Bureau or the superior secrecy administrative department for confirmation. The organ under review shall give a timely reply within the time limit agreed by both parties. If no reply is given within the time limit, the reasons shall be explained in time.
Article 9 The production, storage and transmission of information submitted for trial and its carriers shall be conducted in accordance with the relevant provisions on the management of state secret carriers.
Article 10 Information involving state secrets, work secrets, business secrets and personal privacy shall not be made public. Information that has not been decrypted shall not be made public, information that has not been reviewed for confidentiality shall not be made public, and information with unclear boundaries between disclosure and confidentiality shall not be made public. If a citizen or legal person applies to an administrative organ for obtaining government information according to law, the information involving state secrets shall not be made public. The personnel who undertake the confidentiality review shall be responsible for the disclosure of information due to lax confidentiality review, or the organs and units that should be submitted for trial but not submitted for trial; If it is confirmed by the competent department undertaking the review or the secrecy administrative department that it can be made public and cause leaks, the department under review shall be responsible for it; If the department under review fails to reply within the time limit and fails to explain the reasons, the department under review and its undertaker shall be responsible for it.
Eleventh county-level State Secrecy Bureau shall strengthen the guidance and supervision of information disclosure and confidentiality review, and timely inform the information disclosure and confidentiality review and the existing problems; Organize and carry out security inspection in time, report the leak and put forward rectification opinions.
Twelfth strict information disclosure and confidentiality review work assessment reward and punishment system. The confidentiality review of information disclosure should be included in the evaluation content of information disclosure. The implementation of the confidentiality review of information disclosure shall be included in the assessment content of the leadership responsibility system for confidentiality work of government agencies and units. The relevant personnel of departments or subordinate units that have not leaked secrets shall be praised or rewarded regularly; Those who leak information and those who are directly responsible or responsible for leadership shall be investigated for corresponding political discipline and criminal responsibility in accordance with relevant laws and regulations.