(2) Shu Wei said: One company built the Changqiu Palace. After Emperor Xi Shu received him, he was willing to go there. Later, he said: "I heard that the first generation flourished, so I enjoyed the country for a long time and fell behind."
This passage is mentioned in the History of the Three Kingdoms, followed by another passage by Pei Songzhi: Chen Songzhi thinks about the meaning of the Spring and Autumn Period, and the big evils are taboo, and the small evils are not written. Emperor Wen did not establish a sense of chastity and killed people, and he was clearly sentenced. If Wei believes that great evil is evil, he should hide it. If he thinks it's a little evil, he shouldn't pretend, but worship empty word, and even then, this is unheard of in old history. From this point of view, it is difficult to talk about the goodness of words and deeds after Bian and Zhen. It is good to delete it.
In other words, these may be the taboos of the venerable, tampering with history. The History of the Three Kingdoms is not an officially revised history book. The author has no official files, so he can only sort them out according to the legends at that time. There are many contradictions in the legend, which can only be identified by the author. What you said contradicts the paragraph in reflection. Shu Wei won the trust of one paragraph, and reflection won the trust of another paragraph.