How can I put it? Judging from the news, it was because the pet shop owner ignored it. Because the owner walked for half a month, but he didn't arrange enough food for the pets in the pet shop. In other words, when he left, he didn't pay attention to these pets at all, and even the most basic food was not arranged. Then those pets in the cupboard, because there was no food, couldn't get out and starved to death. Of course, the specific situation remains to be verified, because the informant said that anyway, the pet shop owner felt bankrupt and ignored it; But the owner's reply to this is that because there is an emergency at home, there is no time to pay attention to these pets, which leads to the death of these pets.
There is a saying, anyway, it is certain that the pet was starved to death at present, but whether it was caused by the owner intentionally or carelessly. This is still a mystery. But in any case, if someone's pet dies in it because of the owner's problem, whether the owner intentionally or not, in fact, the owner needs compensation, because these are all fostered by other people's pet owners, and the owner has the responsibility to take care of them. After all, collecting money is a kind of entrustment. Entrustment has contractual obligations, that is, it has legal interests. If you don't perform your contractual obligations, then the client can directly claim compensation from you because you have violated the contract. Of course, it depends on how the pet owners and pet shop owners discuss it.
Generally speaking, this happens because pets starve to death. The crux of the problem is whether the owner caused it unintentionally or intentionally, which remains to be discussed.