Liu Haoran Studio issued a statement denying online rumors. What do you think of this?

The big melon in the entertainment circle shocked netizens, and the negative effect immediately triggered was obvious. Many stars were rumored, and then the relevant studios issued a statement, among which Liu Haoran, whose face was changed by Ai, was obviously the most unlucky one. When many netizens were shocked by the entertainment circle at the end of the year, there were heated discussions on many community websites, which also had other negative effects. For example, at the beginning, there were irresponsible marketing numbers, or netizens made gossip news about other stars, trying to use the heat of this big melon to get a wave of traffic realization. This routine operation is not uncommon, but many netizens mistakenly think it is true. The stars who have been rumored must make a formal statement and rumor through their personal studios. Although the melon is very shocking, it doesn't mean that other serious and self-disciplined peers in the entertainment circle are like this.

The studio also issued a solemn statement on some platforms' false statements about Liu Haoran, which violated Liu Haoran's reputation and were illegal. After asking the other party to delete the relevant video, it also reserves the right to pursue legal proceedings. When AI face-changing technology began to be widely used, it was quickly spoofed by people with ulterior motives. At first, I changed some funny videos on social platforms to improve the click-through rate. Later, it became other black-box operations, such as replacing the faces of female stars with some indecent videos to gain relevant benefits. Because AI face-changing technology looks very realistic in some short videos, it is easy to make people believe it. Innocent female stars who didn't participate in this matter at all had to make solemn lawyer statements for these unwarranted videos. Unexpectedly, male stars can't escape such bad luck.

Some people may know that these videos are changed by AI, and the characters in the videos are not their own gods, but in order to satisfy some special voyeurism, they are willing to spend money to buy such videos, thus forming an upstream and downstream industrial chain. No organization or individual may use special information technology to defile or infringe on the portrait rights of others, and may not make or use it without the consent of the portrait right holder. For the purpose of seeking benefits, it is illegal to combine the faces of celebrities with indecent videos through AI technology. The people who buy these videos are actually promoting such illegal activities.

The studio's statement shows its position well and gives a blow to those who try to wander on the edge of the law. As a public figure, the right to portrait is more likely to be replaced by flowers, and rights can only be safeguarded through legal channels.