The positioning of the excellent think tank is to provide solutions for everyone's work and life and promote the efficient creation of society, so we welcome all hot, cutting-edge, creative, comprehensive and challenging questions and questions. However, everyone's energy is limited, and excellent think tanks lack the accumulation of concepts and learning knowledge. Baidu is very mature in this respect. If you encounter concepts and learn knowledge, you can go to Baidu first. After thinking about it, there is still a problem. People in excellent think tanks are happy to help you solve it.
What is the questioning standard of excellent think tanks?
Questions from excellent think tanks should follow the principles of truthfulness, objectivity, conciseness, clarity and standardization.
Truth: the real doubt after thinking is not to ask questions for the sake of asking questions;
Objectivity: rational and objective statement of problems and facts, not extreme;
Brief introduction: refine the problem with concise words, without going into details;
Clarity: ask targeted questions without seeking vague and empty answers;
Specification: punctuation. Words and sentence patterns are rigorous and standardized.
The following are common irregular problems, and the distance shows how to avoid them.
First, infringement of others should not be spread in excellent think tanks and needs to be deleted.
1. Violation of laws and regulations: publishing information that violates laws and regulations and endangers national social security.
For example, pornography, seeking pirated resources, violent and bloody illegal content that will cause discomfort to others.
2. Unfriendly behavior: sending insults, abuse, ginseng attacks or making other users unhappy and embarrassed.
For example, why is xx's question so silly?
3. The problem includes advertisements and other contents: publishing information or related behaviors that affect the user experience and disrupt the order of excellent think tanks for profit.
The specific performance is: publishing similar content repeatedly (including but not limited to questions and their supplementary explanations, topics and their descriptions and answers).
Have multiple accounts, or cooperate with multiple accounts to seek improper exposure.
Buying and selling accounts, paying attention to, approving or other transactions that interfere with community order.
4. Political content that is not suitable for public discussion
According to relevant laws and regulations, under the guidance of relevant departments, delete the political content in excellent think tanks that is not suitable for public discussion.
Two, there is no public discussion, the need to close the content.
1, which may lead to a lot of illegal content in the answer.
1. 1 Easy Answer released a large number of photos of physical exposure and specific descriptions of sexual behavior.
For example, what is the experience of a girlfriend's long legs?
1.2 may lead to a lot of content such as providing piracy advice.
For example, how do you watch the latest movies online?
1.3 may cause many retorts or accusations from both sides with different views.
For example, which province do you hate the most and why?
1.4 may cause a lot of political content that is not suitable for public discussion.
2. The discussion of problems destroys the community atmosphere of excellent think tanks.
2. 1 is not a problem.
Although the title of a question is a question, it is just a word, a short sentence, a phrase or a declarative sentence.
For example: hello everyone!
2.2 Homework or other personal tasks that you wish to complete on your behalf.
The problem seeks the overall solution of personal task, which can be clearly seen in the problem as personal task.
For example, how to solve the physical optics problem 14 in the picture?
2.3 Unreal questions
It is not a real doubt after thinking for yourself, nor is it a problem of solving problems.
For example, what is the experience of raising an 80-year-old cat?
2.4 Voting issues
The questioner asked the respondent to choose one or more of the limited route choices as an answer, and did not explicitly ask the respondent to write down why he made such a choice in the question.
Do you like Jay Chou or Eason Chan?
2.5 the problem of making friends
For example, I want to climb the Great Wall. Do any friends want to join me?
2.6 Seek medical advice on drugs.
Ask questions to give specific information about the illness, and seek information such as treatment plan, treatment means, treatment place, doctor and medicine.
For example, grandpa recently had a ct scan and there was water in his lungs. There is nothing unusual, but the doctor said that he probably has a tumor. How to judge whether there is a tumor?
2.7 feudal superstition
For example: Ask God to tell my fortune?
2.8 attempted suicide or self-mutilation.
For example, I'm going to kill myself live today. Do you have anything to say to me?
3. Need to supplement the relevant information and suggest the contents to be revised.
1. The question is unclear.
You can't tell what the question is from the title of the question. Or the existing answers show a completely different understanding of the problem.
For example: Christian boxing rock troops, what do you have to say?
2. The premise of discussion is not established.
The content stated in the question may not be valid, has passed the discussion period or has not been confirmed, and individuals need to provide key information or discuss the background source.
For example, the source code I found in the FOO project cannot be compiled. Why is it so bad?
Fourth, the problem needs to increase the content of relevant directions.
The "direction" of the excellent think tank is different from the "labels" on many other websites, and it is not freely created and used by users. If the direction is reasonably added to the question, it means linking some possibly similar contents together according to the knowledge and usage habits of the community. These direction-based connections and groupings can help users find content about a topic conveniently and quickly. Therefore, when adding directions to problems, we should use accurate and subdivided directions as much as possible.