Most of them put information flow advertisements in today's headlines, Tik Tok, Aauto Quicker and other channels to obtain the source of the case. Imagine that if you really encounter legal problems, you still have the mood and time to visit these platforms. Therefore, the source of cases obtained on these platforms is often that the other party just wants to know the legal issues consulted by the parties, and they are basically in a state that has not happened or will happen. This is completely incompatible with the lawyer's desire to find a party with litigation entrustment needs. ...
Lawyers and law firms get such cases, and most of the phone calls are just free consultation with lawyers, which is basically impossible to entrust. It takes time and money, which is a complete collapse for law firms and lawyers ... The final conclusion is: the source of online cases is too unreliable!
Is there no high-quality online case source in the legal field? The answer is yes. Some online organizations can achieve more than one million achievements in one month through online case sources. How did they do it? When a party encounters a legal dispute, it must be anxious to consult a lawyer, so most parties will use search engines (such as Baidu) to find lawyers or law firms. In other words, the source of the case obtained by the search engine is that the parties have legal problems that need to be solved by lawyers or law firms. Because the parties who have legal entrustment needs are concentrated in the search engine channel, the online promotion office will inevitably choose the search engine channel to obtain the source of the case!
Then someone will definitely ask: Then why don't these platforms and institutions go to search engines to obtain online case sources? There are two main reasons:
1, cost: the advertising cost of information flow is low, and there is no need for online customer service to let customers submit forms on their own initiative, which also saves labor costs;
2. Risk: Being a search engine requires professional bidders, and the professional requirements are very high. If you are an inexperienced bidder, it is very likely that you can't get the case source even if you spend money, or the case source cost is very high; These two points are insurmountable for most platforms and institutions. After all, their purpose is to make a profit.
Finally, back to the topic, what is the source of high-quality network cases in the legal industry? Look at the following pictures and you will probably understand.