Article 2 These Measures shall apply to the credit evaluation and management of participants in public resource transactions at all levels in the autonomous region (hereinafter referred to as executing agencies).
The parties involved in the transaction of public resources include project sponsors such as tenderers, purchasers, assignors, assignors and clients, intermediaries or service agencies such as bidding agencies, government procurement agencies, auction agencies and property rights trading agencies, project responders such as bidders, suppliers, transferees and bidders, and bid evaluation experts.
Article 3 The term "credit management of public resource transactions" as mentioned in these Measures refers to the on-site credit evaluation index system established by the Autonomous Region Public Resource Transaction Management Service Center (hereinafter referred to as the Autonomous Region Public Management Center), and the behavior norms of the parties to public resource transactions are recorded by the executing agencies in the form of quantitative scores, which are summarized and made public by the Autonomous Region Public Management Center, and the executing agencies conduct transactions on the parties accordingly. The index system mainly evaluates the irregular behavior of the parties to the public resource transaction who violate the management system and commitment of the public resource transaction activities.
Article 4 The basis of credit evaluation of the parties to a public resource transaction is 100. The calculation method of credit evaluation score is: the basic score of credit evaluation MINUS the MINUS score.
The parties involved in the evaluated public * * * resource transaction will be deducted, and the accumulated deduction will be calculated according to the public * * * resource transaction activities they participated in within the scope of the autonomous region.
Article 5 The comprehensive index system of project sponsors (such as bidders, purchasers, assignors, assignors and customers) is quantified.
1. If the project sponsor is in any of the following circumstances, 20 points will be deducted:
1. The entry transaction project does not meet the trading conditions stipulated by laws and regulations;
2. The transaction scope, method and organizational form of the project should be approved but not fulfilled;
3. Failing to conduct transactions in accordance with the contents approved by the project examination and approval department;
4. Providing false information in the credit information database of market entities;
5. Failing to publish trading information such as trading announcements, trading documents and results publicity on the designated media as required, or the contents of information published on different designated media are inconsistent, which affects normal trading;
6. Failing to publish trading information such as announcement of results within the prescribed time limit;
7. Trading announcements, trading documents and results publicity (announcements) published on the platform have not reached the statutory time limit;
8. Trading announcements, trading documents, results publicity (announcements) and other contents released by the platform do not comply with relevant laws and regulations;
9. Making it difficult for project responders to register;
10. In violation of regulations, it is required to provide bid information and original documents;
1 1. Failing to receive the transaction response file in the agreed way;
12. An error occurred in the process of bid opening, resulting in confusion or abnormal bid opening;
13. The bid evaluation experts are not selected or replaced according to the operating procedures;
14. Failure to comply with the regional management system for bid evaluation, which interferes with or hinders the evaluation by experts;
15. Failing to provide the information required for bid evaluation to the bid evaluation committee, which makes the bid evaluation work unable to proceed normally;
16. Failure to comply with the management system of bid opening area, bid evaluation area and supervision area, resulting in equipment damage or failure to bid opening and evaluation normally;
17. Failing to truthfully record and properly keep the original data of the transaction process;
18. Failing to actively deal with questions and objections in the course of trading, which affects normal trading;
19. Disobeying relevant laws and regulations and interfering with normal transactions in violation of procedures;
20. Other acts that violate the management system and commitments of trading activities and cause adverse consequences.
2. If the project sponsor is in any of the following circumstances, minus 10:
1. The reserved trading time and venue cannot be traded on time, and the public * * * resource trading executing agency is not notified in time;
2. Failing to open the bid on time by advancing or postponing the deadline for bidding without justifiable reasons;
3. Due to insufficient preparation, the bid opening is chaotic or cannot be opened normally on time;
4. Failing to push the transaction information to the public resource trading website in time;
5. Other behaviors that violate the management system and commitments of trading activities and have not caused adverse consequences.
Sixth bidding agencies, government procurement agencies, auction agencies, property rights trading agencies and other intermediary agencies or service agencies to implement a comprehensive index system of quantitative scoring.
1. In any of the following circumstances, 20 points will be deducted:
1. Engaging in agency services beyond the scope of the entrustment agreement (contract), which affects normal transactions;
2 knowing that the entrusted matters are illegal but deliberately entering the market;
3. Engaged in the tendering and procurement agency and tendering and consulting activities of the same project;
4. Modify the transaction documents confirmed by the project sponsor without authorization;
5. Taking advantage of work to guide experts in bid evaluation, which affects fair bid evaluation;
6. Changing the evaluation results of the expert committee without authorization;
7. Failing to prepare the tender documents in accordance with relevant laws and regulations, and formulating exclusive and restrictive clauses;
8. Questioning complaints due to irregular work;
9. It is stipulated in the entrustment contract that the intermediary agency or service agency shall undertake the relevant work, and there are circumstances stipulated in Item (1) of Article 5 of these Measures.
2. If the intermediary institution or service institution is under any of the following circumstances, minus 10:
1. The staff are not familiar with the relevant laws and regulations, which affects the trading projects entering the market;
2. The staff are not familiar with the trading process and operation rules of the public resource trading platform, which affects the trading projects entering the market;
3. Failing to fulfill the obligation of reminding the project sponsors seriously, which affects normal transactions;
4. It is stipulated in the entrustment contract that the intermediary agency or service agency shall undertake the relevant work, and there are circumstances stipulated in Item (2) of Article 5 of these Measures.
1. A comprehensive index system for quantitative evaluation of the scores of project responders such as bidders, suppliers, transferees and bidders.
1. If the project respondent has one of the following circumstances, 20 points will be deducted:
1. Providing false information in the credit information database of market entities;
2. Disobeying the management of on-site staff, violating the discipline of the bid opening venue, disturbing or destroying the order of the bid opening venue, hindering the bid opening or causing the bid opening to fail to proceed smoothly;
3. Failing to notify the project organizer and intermediary or service organization in writing or through the electronic trading system before the deadline for bidding, and withdrawing the submitted bidding documents leads to the failure of normal trading;
4. Inform the bid evaluation experts privately;
5. There is no conclusive reason to question the project;
6. There is no conclusive evidence, and malicious complaints are made to the public resource transaction execution institutions and their staff, resulting in adverse effects;
7. Abandoning the bid winning or transaction result without justifiable reasons;
8. Other behaviors that violate the management system and commitments of trading activities and cause adverse consequences.
(2) If the project respondent has any of the following circumstances, minus 10:
1. The bidder of a domestic project that must be subject to tender according to law fails to transfer the bid bond from basic account;
2. Interfering with bid opening and bid evaluation, without causing adverse consequences;
3. Other behaviors that violate the management system and commitments of trading activities and have not caused adverse consequences.
1. Comprehensive index system for quantitative evaluation of bid evaluation experts' code of conduct.
1. If the bid evaluation expert is in any of the following circumstances, 20 points will be deducted:
1. Providing false information in the credit information database of market entities;
2 confirmed to participate in the bid evaluation but not present and did not ask for leave, affecting the normal bid evaluation;
3. Ask others to bid evaluation or bid evaluation on behalf of others;
4. Unauthorized use of communication tools in the bid evaluation area;
5. Violation of the avoidance system, which should be avoided but not avoided, affecting the normal conduct of the bid evaluation procedure;
6. Leaving the bid evaluation area without authorization before the end of bid evaluation;
7. Ask the project sponsor about the intention of the winning bidder or instruct other bid evaluation experts to score the inclination of a specific bidder;
8. Failing to conduct independent bid evaluation in accordance with the requirements of the transaction documents;
9. Contact the bidder privately;
10. Sign the blank bid evaluation conclusion or directly sign the results of other bid evaluation experts without independent bid evaluation;
1 1. The bid evaluation is not serious or seriously wrong, resulting in effective complaints;
12. Failing to comply with the overnight bid evaluation management system in the bid evaluation area;
13. Demanding excessive labor remuneration or putting forward other consumption requirements;
14. refusing to sign the bid evaluation report without justifiable reasons;
15. Violation of confidentiality discipline, disclosure of information related to bid evaluation, causing doubts, objections or complaints;
16. Personal insults and personal attacks on supervisors and staff at the bid evaluation site;
17. Deliberately damaging the property on the bid evaluation site;
18. Refusing to assist or cooperate with relevant departments to conduct inquiries, complaints, inquiries, supervision and inspection according to law;
19. There are serious mistakes or serious violations in bid evaluation;
20. Other acts that violate the management system and commitments of trading activities and cause adverse consequences.
(2) If the bid evaluation experts are under any of the following circumstances, the score will be reduced by 10:
1. The bid evaluation is more than 30 minutes late;
2. The digital certificate required for bid evaluation is not processed or the digital certificate exceeds the validity period, which affects the normal bid evaluation;
3. Failing to cooperate with the staff for expert identity verification or electronic verification;
4. Portable communication tools (including electronic devices and mobile storage devices, etc.) are not stored. ) enter the bid evaluation area;
5. Entering other bid evaluation rooms without permission during bid evaluation;
6. Deliberately compressing or delaying the bid evaluation time;
7. Violating the discipline of bid evaluation, taking the information or materials involved in the bid evaluation process away from the bid evaluation room without authorization;
8. Other behaviors that violate the management system and commitments of trading activities and have not caused adverse consequences.
1. In case of any violation of laws and regulations listed in Articles 5, 6, 7 and 8 of these Measures, the public * * * resource transaction executing agency shall submit relevant evidence to the relevant industry administrative supervision department for handling according to law. Where there are other provisions in laws, regulations and rules on the handling of illegal acts, such provisions shall prevail.
2. Violations recorded by executing agencies shall be published on their respective websites. The publicity contents include the names of both parties to the transaction, the name of the project, the types of points to be reduced or exempted, and the validity period of points to be reduced or exempted. The publicity period is 5 working days. After the publicity, the irregular behavior record will take effect without objection and be pushed to the website of the public management center of the autonomous region.
3 autonomous region public management center to establish a unified trading service credit evaluation information files and information sharing mechanism.
4. The public management center of the autonomous region summarizes the credit evaluation scores, and publishes the credit evaluation scores of the parties below 100 on the autonomous region's public * * * resources trading online.
The corresponding relationship between the credit evaluation score and the announcement period is: deduct 10, the announcement period is one month, subtract 20 points, and the announcement period is three months.
The reduced credit score will be automatically restored at the expiration of the announcement period.
5. If the transaction initiator, intermediary agency or service agency, transaction responder and bid evaluation expert think that the contents of credit publicity are inconsistent with the facts, they shall raise an objection in writing to the executing agency that made the record within 5 working days from the date of publicity, and the executing agency shall verify and inform the objector of the result within 20 working days from the date of accepting the objection. After verification, if the information disclosure is inconsistent with the facts, it shall be corrected in time.
6. Encourage the transaction organizers, intermediary agencies or service agencies to incorporate the credit evaluation score into the bid evaluation score when preparing the transaction documents, accounting for 3%-5% of the bid evaluation score.
7. Encourage the credit evaluation results of all parties to the public resource transaction as an important basis for the project sponsors to choose intermediaries or service agencies and project responders, and as an important reference for the supervision of administrative supervision departments in various industries.
8. Credit evaluation units and their staff shall perform their duties objectively and fairly, and those who practice favoritism, abuse their powers or neglect their duties shall be dealt with according to the law and regulations; If a crime is constituted, criminal responsibility shall be investigated according to law.
9. These Measures shall be implemented as of July, 2065438 1 day.
For more information about project/service/procurement bidding, and to improve the winning rate, please click on the bottom of official website Customer Service for free consultation:/#/? source=bdzd