Tencent and other enterprises were fined 500,000 yuan. What case does Tencent's fine focus on?

On April 30th, on the eve of Labor Day, the State Administration of Market Supervision (hereinafter referred to as "State Administration of Market Supervision") issued nine tickets intensively. The main enterprises involve Tencent, Didi, Suning Dongrun (a subsidiary of Suning), Shanghai Han Tao Information Consulting Co., Ltd., Jiaxing Venture Global Co., Ltd. and Hongyun Jiukang Data Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd. ..

The main reason for Tencent's punishment is "concentration of operators who failed to declare illegal implementation according to law", but it does not have the effect of excluding or restricting competition. "Tencent was fined, mainly for the application procedures in investor cases in previous years," a person familiar with the matter told the mechanism, but the regulator also believed that the concentration of operators in these transactions would not have the effect of excluding and restricting competition.

Didi and Suning also received tickets.

Throughout the nine votes, in addition to the Internet giant Tencent, Didi and Suning are also well-known. 2065438+August 2009, Didi Smart Transportation and Inspur Smart Investment, which are engaged in information technology development, respectively signed the Cooperation Agreement on the Establishment of Shandong Inspur Didi Smart Technology Co., Ltd. and Business Cooperation, and invested in the establishment of a joint venture company in Jinan City, Shandong Province, with Didi Smart Transportation and Inspur Smart Investment holding 42% and 58% respectively. On September 3, 20 19, the joint venture obtained the business license.

20 16 16 On February 2nd, Suning Dongrun, a holding subsidiary of Suning Holding Group Co., Ltd., through its subsidiary Nanjing Henghao Enterprise Management Consulting Partnership (Limited Partnership), signed an Agreement on Capital Increase of Shanghai Guo Yi E-Commerce Co., Ltd. with its former shareholder Zhang Ye, and made a capital increase of Shanghai Guo Yi in cash to obtain its 15.438+0.

The ticket issued by the State Administration of Market Supervision shows that Didi, Suning and Tencent have similar illegal reasons, "which constitutes a concentration of operators who have not declared illegal implementation according to law", but related party transactions do not have the effect of excluding or restricting competition.

Based on the conclusion of investigation and evaluation, the State Administration of Market Supervision imposed an administrative penalty of 500,000 yuan on Didi Smart Transportation and Inspur Smart Investment respectively, and 500,000 yuan on Suning Dongrun.