At present, most of the construction parties win the bid after the lowest profit, which leads to the construction party doing everything possible to ask for more when settling accounts. The construction party has several common settlement skills for your reference.
1, falsely reporting workload. You can avoid carefully checking the workload;
2. Repeat quotation and negotiation. There are often more than two negotiated changes for the same change;
3, misinterpret the terms of the contract;
4. The vague negotiation part. A construction unit reported the budget, taking advantage of the vague part of the negotiation and the carelessness of the settlement personnel of the construction unit who were unfamiliar with the construction site and working attitude, and even asked for more than 6 million yuan through one negotiation;
5. Change the negotiation content;
6, conversion quota number;
7. For projects with labor costs, change the content of fixed labor costs and increase project costs;
8. Change the workload automatically calculated by the budget software, such as high-rise buildings. ;
9, inflated work items;
10, which means dark.
Views and opinions:
1. As a contractor, the situation of over-reporting in settlement is caused by the general environment, because there is always some room for audit for auditors.
Seeking truth from facts will also be partially censored.
2, said the situation also exists, but the reason, but also yourself, do your duty. But as long as it does not violate the norms and the spirit of the document, both parties can get by and reach the highest level, which is also our ultimate goal as cost personnel.
3. Every problem should be treated dialectically, and the business is different. But the construction party is often in a weak position.
4, still pay attention to fairness and justice!
Audit skills of project budget and final accounts
The compilation of project budget and settlement is a work with a lot of data, heavy analysis and calculation, and many policy and technical problems, so the review of cost consultation report is also a technical, policy and economic work. The main contents of the review are whether the calculation of engineering quantity and the application of budget unit price are correct, and whether the various expense standards conform to the existing regulations. If the preparatory work before the review is done well and appropriate review methods and techniques are adopted, the review of the project budget and final accounts may achieve twice the result with half the effort.
(a) do a good job of preparation before the review.
1, familiar with the construction drawings. Construction drawing is an important basis for compilation, review, pre-settlement and sub-settlement. You must be completely familiar with it, check all the drawings and read them in turn after counting them correctly.
2. Understand the scope of pre-settlement. According to the preparation instructions of pre-settlement, understand the engineering contents contained in pre-settlement. For example, supporting facilities, outdoor pipelines, roads, design changes after the joint review of drawings, etc.
3. Find out the unit valuation table. Any unit valuation table or budget quota has a certain scope of application. According to the nature of the project, collect and be familiar with the corresponding unit price and quota data.
(2) Review the skills of project budget settlement.
In order to realize the rapid review of project budget and settlement, we must follow the principles of coarse to fine, comparative analysis, finding mistakes and simplifying the review, and adopt the techniques and methods of comparison, item by item screening and rapid calculation by using the principle of overall planning to make the review work get twice the result with half the effort.
1, group calculation review method. The group calculation review method is to divide the projects in the pre-settlement into several groups, make the interrelated and internally related projects into one group, review or calculate the engineering quantity of a sub-item in the same group, and judge the accuracy of other sub-items in the same group by using the relationship between the same or similar engineering quantities. For example:
(1) geosyncline excavation, foundation masonry, foundation cushion, trench backfilling and earth moving.
(2) Ground construction area, ground surface layer, ground cushion layer, ground surface layer, ground leveling layer, ground volume, greenhouse plastering, greenhouse painting and roof layer.
(3) Exterior wall plastering, exterior wall plastering, exterior wall interior plastering, exterior wall doors and windows, exterior wall lintel and masonry.
The first group (1) first calculates the earthwork excavation, foundation masonry (below outdoor terrace) and foundation cushion, and determines the backfill earthwork and pipe trench transportation as follows:
Backfill volume = excavation volume-(foundation masonry+cushion volume)
Residual soil volume = foundation masonry+cushion volume
Group (2), first calculate the floor area and building area. The quantities of ground leveling layer, ceiling plastering and painting are the same as the ground area; The number of cushion is equal to the floor area multiplied by the cushion thickness, and the number of hollow floors multiplied by the converted floor thickness. The construction area of the ground floor plus the cantilever area multiplied by the slope coefficient (not multiplied by the flat elevation) is the roof quantity; The bottom floor area multiplied by the slope coefficient (not multiplied by the plane) multiplied by the average thickness of the insulation layer is the number of insulation layers.
In group (3), first list and fill in the door and window areas and lintel volumes of internal and external walls with various thicknesses, and then calculate the quantities. Calculate the interior wall area first, then reduce the door and window area, and then multiply the wall thickness to reduce the ring beam volume equal to the wall volume (if the indoor and outdoor height difference is different from the wall material, it should be deducted from the wall and calculated separately). Exterior wall plastering can be calculated by multiplying the wall by the fixed coefficient, or estimated by multiplying the external plastering by 0.9.
2. Comparative review method. This method is a method of comparing and auditing the budget of the proposed similar project with the pre-settlement of the completed project or the pre-settlement of the project that has not been completed but has been audited and modified. Comparative evaluation method generally has the following situations, which should be treated differently according to different situations of the project.
(1) Two projects adopt the same construction drawing, but the foundation part and site conditions are different, so the above-mentioned part of the foundation of the new project can be compared and checked; Different parts can be reviewed by corresponding review methods.
(2) The design of the two projects is the same, but the construction area is different. According to the characteristics that the ratio of the construction area of the two projects is basically the same as that of the two subprojects, the subprojects of the new project can be audited. Or it is correct to use the cost of two projects per square meter of construction area and the pre-settlement of sub-projects per square meter of construction area. On the contrary, it shows that there is a problem with the pre-settlement of new projects, find out the cause of the error and correct it.
(3) When two projects have the same area, but the design drawings are not exactly the same, the same parts, such as columns, shelves, roofs, brick walls, etc. Comparison and recheck can be made in the workshop, and partial projects that cannot be compared can be calculated according to the drawings.
3. Decomposition and comparative review method. It is a method to decompose a unit project according to the direct cost and indirect cost, and then decompose the direct cost according to the type of work and the branch project, and compare it with the approved standard budget. Comparative analysis review method generally has three steps:
The first step is to conduct a comprehensive pre-settlement audit on the finalized standard construction drawing or reusable construction drawing of a certain building, which will be used as a comparative basis for the pre-settlement audit of other similar projects. Moreover, the examination and approval of the pre-settlement is divided into two parts according to the direct cost and the receivable cost, and then the direct cost is decomposed into the pre-settlement of various projects and sub-projects to calculate the pre-settlement price per square meter respectively.
The second step is to compare the pre-settlement of the project to be reviewed with the unilateral expenses of the same type of pre-settlement. If it is not within 1%-3%, decompose it according to local requirements, and compare it while decomposing. Those with large differences will be further inspected.
The third step is to compare and review. The method is as follows:
(1) After analysis and comparison, if it is found that the expenses payable are quite different, the investment source and engineering category of the construction project should be considered, as well as whether the charging items and charging standards conform to the existing regulations; If there is a big difference in material price adjustment, the statistical table of material price adjustment should be further reviewed to compare the consumption, unit price difference and increased quantity of various price adjustment materials.
(2) After decomposition and comparison, if it is found that there is a big difference in the pre-settlement price of civil engineering, further compare the sub-projects or project details. By comparison, first check whether the listed project details are correct and whether the pre-settlement price is consistent. If there is a big difference, the unit price of the budget will be further reviewed, and finally the engineering quantity of the project details will be reviewed.
4. Other review methods.
(1) comprehensive review method. For some projects with relatively small quantities and simple technology, the technical force for preparing project budget and settlement is relatively weak, so the comprehensive review method can be adopted. The specific audit process and budget preparation in this way are basically the same, which is more comprehensive and detailed. After the audit, the project budget error is less, the quality is higher, but the workload is larger.
(2) Key spot check method. Focus on reviewing projects with large quantities or high cost and complex engineering structure, supplement the unit valuation table, and the basis and standard for charging various fees. This method is short in review time, focused and effective.
(3) Adopt the method of manual review. According to the standard atlas, the quantities of prefabricated components commonly used in engineering are calculated, such as washbasins, benches, inspection wells, septic tanks, cabinets, etc., and the unit price is put on it, compiled into a manual, and audited by the manual, which can greatly simplify the editing work of pre-settlement.
(4) screening review method. Although there are differences in the building area and height of building projects, the numerical values of quantities, costs and labor consumption of sub-projects in unit area have not changed much. These data are collected, optimized and summarized into three unilateral basic value tables of engineering quantity, cost and labor consumption, and the applicable building standards are pointed out. These basic values are like "sieve holes" used to screen sub-projects of each division, and the screened ones will not be audited. If it is not screened out, it means that the unit construction area of the sub-project is not within the basic value range, and the sub-project should be reviewed in detail. This Law shall apply to residential projects or projects that do not meet the conditions for comprehensive examination.
You must view the settlement summary.
1. After the completion of the project, Party B will settle the account according to the later changed construction drawing, and the settlement will still adopt the bill pricing method. The settlement price is120,000 yuan, and there is also a negotiation change of 2 million yuan (the completion drawing and completion acceptance report of this project have not been processed, and many materials and practices have not been signed). During the audit of this project, the settlement quotation of the consulting company based on Party B is inconsistent with the contract price, and the comprehensive unit price and practice of settlement are also inconsistent with the tender. In addition, the construction drawing and the drawings at the time of bidding have changed greatly, which has not met the conditions stipulated in the bidding documents. Therefore, it is decided to adopt the method of fixed valuation settlement for audit, and all settlement construction drawings will be recalculated, and the cost of measures will be recalculated. The approved price is far lower than the settlement price of Party B. However, Party B insists on settlement according to the list on the grounds that there is a price in the list, and does not agree to adjust the comprehensive unit price fee and measures fee. The two sides are deadlocked and the negotiations are deadlocked. How to judge this difference?
A: The focus of this question is whether to settle by quota. Therefore, when both parties confirm that the settlement is made at a fixed price, whether there is a sign or not, if there is, it is correct regardless of the price. If not, both parties must re-determine the settlement method before settlement.
2. When the bill is settled, how to settle the bill after the adjustment of material price difference, temporary valuation and the contents of the bill subtitle according to the contract? Material price adjustment and temporary valuation can be implemented according to the contract, but what if the contents contained in the list items change, increase or decrease? In addition, if Party A stipulates that the price of the changed single subtitle will not be adjusted within a certain limit, how to avoid the risk? At the same time, does this clause apply to the price after the contents of the above list are changed?
Answer: At the time of settlement, the adjustment of material price difference and temporary valuation should comply with the contract. The change of list items is divided into two parts, one is the change of engineering quantity, and the other is the change of work content. The first one is completely adjusted according to the price limit requirements of individual subtitles. Second, based on the specific requirements of the contract for design changes or visas.
3. How to deal with several problems in the completion settlement of the bidding project based on the bill of quantities pricing model (the contract indicates that the settlement shall be made according to the actual completed quantities, that is, whether the error of the bill of quantities is exceeded or not is not considered): (1) The increase or decrease of quantities, and the cost of partial projects can be calculated according to the bidding unit price; So should the measure fee in the original bid price be adjusted accordingly? (2) After the adjustment of direct cost or measure cost, should the cost in the original tender offer be adjusted accordingly? (3) Is the tax adjusted accordingly?
Answer: After the increase or decrease of engineering quantity, the partial items will be adjusted according to the actual situation. This measure should analyze whether the change is caused by the change of engineering quantity and whether it is within the scope of claim stipulated in the contract.
Whatever the reason, fees and taxes will be adjusted according to the settlement amount.
4. In the settlement of the project subject to tender, the group price of the comprehensive unit price of the new project, the material price is determined according to the material price quoted by the construction unit when bidding or according to the actual material price in the construction process. For example, the original bidding basis was a band, but later it was changed to a full house basis, and the full house basis must be re-priced?
Answer: According to the specific requirements of the contract for settlement items, it is necessary to analyze whether the price of materials is all-inclusive, and whether the changes in the contents of the list items cause changes in measures. If there is no requirement, it should be priced according to the actual material price. If the list items change, it should be re-priced, but it must be approved by the construction unit or the supervisor.
5. How to solve the increase or decrease of engineering quantity caused by incorrect engineering quantity in the bill of quantities?
Answer: It shall be implemented according to the specific requirements of the settlement clause in the contract. If there is no requirement, it is necessary to analyze the type of this contract, whether it is an open contract or a closed contract. Generally, both parties will negotiate settlement and supplement detailed contract terms before settlement.
6. At present, there is a project priced by bill of quantities, and the contract is adjustable unit price contract. The final cost does not include the materials provided by Party A, which is 6.5438+million yuan, and the materials provided by Party A are 5 million yuan. Party A has approved the mining premium of 654.38+00% for us, and now we need to return the materials provided by Party A. The question is whether measures and expenses should be taken for the 5 million yuan. In addition, does the 10% premium of 500,000 also include the measure fee?
A: The materials and measures provided by Party A are two independent expenses, which may not be related. After the signing of the contract, if it is not clearly stipulated, the measures cannot be changed, and they are the expenses that must be incurred to complete the qualified project. For the materials supplied by Party A, the construction unit will only keep the storage fee when returning them. Of course, if the settlement amount changes, the handling fees and taxes will be adjusted accordingly.
7. In the construction contract of a construction project, according to the total project price in the preliminary budget, the labor insurance fee should be 6.5438+0.8 million yuan, but both parties agreed in the contract that it should be 6.5438+0.5 million yuan. Later, due to the owner's financial reasons, the project stopped working and could not be resumed for 18 months. When both parties cancel the contract and settle the actual completed project, they will only take 80,000 yuan of labor insurance fee according to the normal charging standard. The construction party thinks that the contract signing is "all-in-one use", that is, regardless of the increase or decrease of the project, it should be 6,543,800 yuan+0.5 million yuan, and no adjustment will be made. On the other hand, the employer thinks that on the basis of the budget of 6.5438+0.8 million yuan, the original contract labor insurance fee has been reduced to 6.5438+0.5 million yuan, and the actual labor insurance fee now should be reduced in the same proportion, and should be reduced in proportion on the basis of 80,000 yuan? How to deal with this situation?
Under the above circumstances, the actual settlement price of the project is far less than the total price of the project when the contract was awarded, and the temporary facilities fee is also lowered according to the actual completed quantities. However, the construction party indicated that the temporary facilities fee had been invested in one time according to the project scale in the early stage of construction, and because of the construction party, the temporary facilities exceeded the construction period agreed in the contract, and there was not much residual value for the temporary facilities, so the temporary facilities fee should remain unchanged according to the original contract budget. I think the builder has a point. I don't know how to handle this situation according to industry rules.
A: This problem belongs to the settlement method of completed projects after the termination of the contract. In principle, the settlement method should be determined according to the requirements of the termination settlement clause of the contract. If there is no requirement, both parties shall coordinate to determine the settlement method, but the settlement method of normal operation of the project shall not prevail. Generally speaking, the settlement is based on facts, so there is no problem that the temporary facilities fee will be reduced in proportion, and the claims arising from the termination of the contract will also increase.
8. If the general contractor hands over the waterproof project to others, the other party has a detailed unit price (material cost+labor cost) and it is signed by Party A.. Therefore, we will load it according to the unit price approved by Party A at the time of settlement, but the auditor only agrees to adjust the cost of main materials, but does not agree to adjust the quota content and labor cost. The principle is 200 1 fixed market price and fixed quantity. How should this situation be solved?
A: First of all, the settlement must be based on the contract. It doesn't matter whether the general contractor has a big bag or not. The agreement in this contract is true, and the signature of Party A is recognized. If there is a clear agreement in the contract to settle accounts according to the quota, whether Party A signs or not, it is necessary to find evidence to change the settlement basis. If there is no sign, it cannot be identified.
9. The mechanical excavation project is not stipulated in the contract, and Party A has no special requirements. The construction unit adopts retaining walls and sandbags for slope protection. Should it be included in the settlement cost?
Answer: If bidding is adopted for this project, whether retaining walls are adopted in the bidding scheme, if so, cannot be calculated separately. If it is another scheme, the consent of the construction unit and the supervisor must be obtained when changing the scheme. If there are any signing procedures, they should be supplemented. If not, it cannot be added.
10, I used the bill for settlement for the first time in my actual work. Can the comprehensive unit price change due to the change of material price or actual situation? How much can be changed if the contract is not binding? For example, in the process of earthwork excavation, will the comprehensive unit price change with the increase of transportation distance or the change of equipment used? What procedures do I need to go through if I can change it?
The price of materials varies greatly. When bidding, the unit price of stone is 65 yuan. Due to the long construction period, the ex-factory price of stone became 1 10 yuan. Can the comprehensive unit price be changed? Or how to settle accounts to make both parties more suitable?
Answer: The bill of quantities is generally based on a fixed unit price contract, and some risks are considered in the comprehensive unit price. As long as the work content has not changed, the price of materials should not be adjusted. Whether it can be adjusted depends on the settlement clause in the contract. If no agreement can be reached, both parties shall settle it through consultation.
1 1. When the bid price of a project subject to tender changes in the final accounts, can the tender be recalculated or only the changed part be calculated? Can the material price in the tender be adjusted at the time of settlement? (Sign an adjustable price contract)
Answer: According to the contract, under normal circumstances, the changed part can only be calculated according to the method agreed in the contract. As for the price of materials, the contract should still prevail. If there is no agreement, the changed part can only be settled according to the facts, and the bidding part shall not be adjusted. For special circumstances, both parties shall settle them through consultation.
12, the project contract is signed as a general contract, and the comprehensive unit price is calculated according to granite mortar masonry. Negotiate to switch to imported microcrystalline glue for laying, and the construction unit also increased the original quantity at the time of settlement. Excuse me, colleagues, is the change in quantity allowed?
Answer: According to the contract's agreement on the change terms, from this perspective, if there is no agreement in the contract, they are two different list items, and the price of the changed list items will be confirmed by the construction party at the time of settlement, and it is allowed to change the engineering quantity.
13. The total price is guaranteed to be dead. How can the construction unit report the settlement information?
Answer; Quite simply, if there is no change, the contract amount is equal to the settlement amount. How to adjust the change according to the contract, how to adjust and add the change fee. Secondly, the claim fee should be increased according to the contract.
14. Is there any provision for project cost settlement in the current laws and regulations? If it is an invitation to tender project, it must be calculated in the form of bid price+visa+change. If the two parties agree in the settlement method to complete the final accounts of quantities according to the facts, can the missing quantities and projects (actually completed) in the tender offer be supplemented?
A: To be precise, laws and regulations do not rigidly stipulate which settlement method must be adopted. If the settlement method agreed by both parties is completed according to the actual engineering quantity, it can be used as a supplementary condition of the contract and has legal effect, and can supplement the engineering quantity and projects omitted in the tender offer.
15, digging pile earthwork construction, the contractor does not contain materials, in which the contract stipulates that earthwork shall be calculated according to the actual situation, and shall be calculated separately in case of landslide. Now Party A's representatives and supervisors are dissatisfied with Party A, so the number of earthwork and landslides has increased a lot. How do I settle accounts as Party A?
A: This is an internal management problem of Party A. If both the representative of Party A and the supervisor approve the visa, it should be resolved with the construction unit. If Party A finds that the internal personnel are dereliction of duty, it shall present sufficient evidence or go through legal procedures.
16. How to return the materials provided by Party A at the time of settlement has been controversial. Do you want to ask?
A: The materials provided by Party A shall be negotiated by both parties. Under normal circumstances, after normal settlement, the materials provided by Party A shall be deducted according to the settlement price. The difference between the purchase market price and the settlement price of the materials supplied by Party A shall be settled by Party A itself, and Party B may calculate the storage fee of the materials supplied by Party A during the deduction.
17, our company has recently completed a project and is making final settlement. The contract price of this project is very low, and nearly one third of the engineering quantity belongs to the materials supplied by Party A and Party A's subcontracted projects. It is stipulated in the contract that the project settlement shall be carried out according to the quota of 0 1, and the related expenses shall be reduced by 10%, which is a great reduction in the negotiation fee of this project. (Party A's engineer indicated in the visa that economic changes are no longer included, but the reduction is indeed included. If the reduced part is also implemented according to this clause agreed in the contract, our losses will be great. I think the contract price of this project is very low, and a large part of it is subcontracted by Party A, which is basically fixed. As a reduction, it can only be our actual workload except the materials subcontracted by Party A and supplied by Party A, so I think the reduced part cannot be implemented according to this contract. Please make it clear.
Answer: The settlement should be to deduct the materials supplied by Party A and the subcontracted projects designated by Party A from the budget first, then use the remaining project funds as the contract price, and then calculate the added projects according to the contract (downward as agreed).
18, a settlement project I am doing now adopts bill of quantities bidding. If there is any discrepancy between the quantities provided by the Employer and the actually completed quantities during the bidding, the multi-column part shall not be deducted according to the regulations of the local department, and the settlement shall be made according to the bid price of the corresponding bill of quantities; The missing items and less listed parts shall be settled according to the valuation basis and guidance price issued by the construction administrative department. The problem I am facing now is that the quotation of distribution box installation subtitle in our bid-winning budget is too low, which is mainly caused by the low quotation of distribution box in the budget and cannot be adjusted according to the regulations. However, if part of the distribution box (in the quantities contracted by Party A) is omitted, shall it be settled according to the comprehensive unit price of similar distribution boxes in the bid-winning budget, or shall the actual equipment price be included in the subtitle according to the new comprehensive unit price?
A: Generally speaking, the construction drawing, the construction plan signed by Party A, the on-site visa form, the technical verification form, the engineering change form and the effective completion data can all be used as the basis for settlement; However, some Party A will stipulate that the materials as the economic basis for settlement must be specially signed and bound, and it should be clearly stipulated in the contract as far as possible to avoid wrangling during settlement.
19, the settlement basis stipulated in the contract is the construction drawing budget, design change and on-site visa. When the project is settled, can the construction unit provide hidden information as the basis for settlement?
A: Concealed works can be used as the basis for design changes or on-site visas, but they must be supplemented.
20. The price of cables and wires has gone up too much this year. I asked Party A to adjust the price difference for us at the time of settlement, but Party A refused to adjust it for us. Party A said that this was agreed in the contract, including risk factors. The risk is too great. I wonder if Party A can adjust it for us. In addition, I don't know if there are any documents about the rise of copper, and the increase will not be adjusted. The rate of increase needs to be stipulated in the contract, but it can be adjusted at any time. Besides, how can I get Party A to adjust the price difference for me?
A: According to the contract, if there is no agreement in the contract, it can only be solved by both parties through consultation.
2 1, the description in the bill of quantities is inconsistent with the construction drawings, and there is a site visa during construction. Whether the settlement price can be adjusted when the total price is fixed.
A: According to the settlement clause in the contract, the change and visa are agreed, and the contract will be implemented as soon as it is clear. If it is not clearly agreed that the settlement method of change and visa shall be determined by both parties through consultation, the settlement shall prevail.
22. According to the project bidding documents and the contract, the price of main materials is calculated according to the information price in the local announcement. However, during the construction, both parties signed the main material price, which was significantly higher than the information price in the local bulletin, and the supervision unit also signed it. What should an audit department do?
A: If there is an agreement in the contract, it shall be implemented first. In addition, the supervision unit will sign it, but the construction unit will not sign it, because some contracts stipulate that the supervision responsibility is only responsible for the site situation, and the expenses involved must be signed by Party A. If Party A also signs it, it can be considered as supplementary settlement information and should be priced.
23. According to the provisions of the project bidding documents and contracts, the price of main materials shall be calculated according to the information price in the local announcement. However, during the construction, the two sides signed a supplementary agreement, and the main material price for settlement was the information price in the local bulletin plus transportation fee, and it was agreed that the secondary transportation fee, transportation fee and secondary transportation fee were significantly higher than the market price. What should an audit department do?
Answer: If Party A signs a supplementary agreement, it shall notify Party A if it finds any discrepancy during the audit, but if Party A agrees or explains special reasons, it shall be settled according to the supplementary agreement (except government audit).
I. Settlement Part
1. A project (quota pricing) contract stipulates that the foundation shall be settled according to the facts. At the time of settlement, it was found that the excavation width of the foundation trench was larger than the calculation rules of the quota quantity (that is, the working face was increased according to the bottom width of the foundation), and there were differences between the construction unit and the construction unit. The construction unit considers it as a construction measure, and only recognizes the engineering quantity calculated according to the fixed engineering quantity calculation rules according to the contract "the part exceeding the design shall not be measured". Excuse me: 1), what do you mean by "actual settlement"? How to understand? 2) How does the foundation trench of this project settle?
Answer: 1, according to the actual settlement refers to the actual workload or expenses consumed by the construction according to the requirements of the specification and the completion of a survival.
2. The settlement of foundation trench depends on the cause of over-excavation. If the overbreak is caused by the owner or force majeure, it is necessary to apply for design change or visa, and the settlement will be made according to the actual amount after construction. If it is due to the construction party, it can be considered that the construction is not in accordance with the requirements of the specification, and the settlement should be carried out in accordance with the rules.
2. There are a lot of changes and visas in the settlement of a project, and there are differences in understanding the calculation involving visas. The difference is as follows: a work visa fee is increased by 53,000 yuan, but it is not indicated whether all expenses are included, so is it included in the direct fee to participate in the profit and tax calculation, or is it directly included in the pre-tax cost or directly included in the after-tax cost? Besides, because Party A has a 20% discount, is there any discount for the visa?
Answer: 1. The visa is aimed at the actual cost, and the general visa only needs to be taxed separately, which is directly included in the pre-tax cost.
2. Whether the visa part is favorable or not depends on the contract. If there is an agreement, it shall be implemented according to the contract. If no agreement is reached, both parties need to negotiate. Generally speaking, the discount is for this project, and the visa is also included in the total cost of a single project, so the discount is also needed.
3. For a project, the description of independent foundation excavation in the bill of quantities in the tender document is as follows: "Three kinds of soil foundations for foundation excavation: the bottom area of independent foundation layer: 1.8m*2.0m, the excavation depth: 2.7m, and the transportation distance of spoil:-1.2m", which is defined as1. There is nothing wrong with the elevation of the foundation bottom surface of -2.7m, but in the description of the independent foundation concrete, "Independent foundation, cushion material type and thickness: 100 thick C 15 plain concrete cushion, 1000 thick sand cushion, each with 50CM base edge, concrete strength grade: C25". I would like to ask that the independent foundation has been completed as described. Excuse me, the "1000 thick gravel cushion, the bottom edge of each layer is 50CM" in the independent foundation? Can it be calculated when the earthwork is settled?
Answer: According to the valuation specification of bill of quantities, the quantity of earthwork bill for foundation excavation is calculated according to "cushion area * excavation depth", and the excavation depth is calculated from the bottom surface of cushion, so the quantity of 50CM bottom surface and the thickness of cushion should be calculated.
As the above case only lists the engineering characteristics of the list, it does not explain whether the earthwork quantity provided by Party A is calculated according to "cushion area * excavation depth (cushion bottom)", so it is difficult to judge whether Party A has omitted calculation. The construction party needs to verify, and if it does miss the calculation, it needs to ask Party A to supplement this part of the engineering quantity.
4. Does the new project in the total price need to add construction measures, such as adding a wall, and do you need to calculate scaffolding?
A: It depends on the contract. Usually, the total price does not include new projects. After the new project is added, if the extra construction measure fee (generally referred to as technical measure fee) is caused by the construction, it needs to be calculated.
5. Recently, a claim was encountered in a water purification plant project. Before the earthwork excavation organization was formally submitted to the supervisor and the owner, we carried out large-scale earthwork excavation with the consent of the supervisor and the owner. The excavation depth of the foundation pit is 4.5M, the upper mouth is 98M long and 46.5M wide, and there is an open caisson that has been built and put into use on one side of the foundation pit. Before the excavation, we verbally requested to drive two rows of steel sheet piles near the sedimentation tank according to the design requirements. But the owner and supervisor refused because the cost was too high, so we adopted natural slope excavation. Later, due to the local collapse and uneven settlement of the earthwork near the sedimentation tank, a drainage pipe at the original sedimentation tank was broken, and the earthwork collapsed in a large area under water immersion. After the accident, we took active measures to remedy it, re-drilled two rows of steel sheet piles near the sedimentation tank and made concrete slope protection, and transferred four pumps to continuously pump water. Afterwards, we asked for a claim, but the supervisor and the owner refused the visa for the following two reasons:
(1) Our earthwork construction organization was formally submitted to the supervisor only after the accident.
(2) The supervisor and the owner verbally refused to play two rows of steel sheet piles, but did not refuse to play one row of steel sheet piles, which was considered as an accident caused by our imperfect construction organization and poor construction measures.