Respondent: Zhang Meimei, female, Han nationality, address, XXXXXX, ID number, XXXXXX.
Respondent Li Pingping, male, Han nationality, address XXXXXXXX, ID number XXXXXXXX.
The respondent Li Pingping v. my divorce case, and the respondent replied as follows:
My relationship with plaintiff Li Pingping is still very good. Do not agree to divorce, request the court to dismiss the plaintiff's claim.
First, although the plaintiff and I were introduced, we lived together for a year before marriage. After a year of friendship, we entered the marriage hall and thought that the other party was a lifelong partner, so I established a good marriage foundation with the plaintiff.
Second, after nearly 8 years of living together, we have established a good relationship between husband and wife. I rebuilt the whole courtyard with the plaintiff and bought harvesters, cars and other agricultural and household goods. These are the results of my struggle with the plaintiff and the testimony of my relationship with the plaintiff.
The plaintiff's indictment claims that I can't have children, which has nothing to do with the facts. I lived with plaintiff * * * for more than 8 years, during which I was pregnant and miscarried three times, all because the plaintiff didn't want to assume the obligation of being a father prematurely, saying that I didn't want to have children for the time being and forced me to have an abortion, which made me lose two opportunities to be a mother and caused great physical and mental harm to me.
The plaintiff's mother has been ill in bed for many years. Since I got married, I have not only engaged in the business of raising laying hens at home, but also served the plaintiff's mother, washing her clothes and feeding her medicine. I worked hard for the whole family, and my neighbors saw it.
In the complaint, the plaintiff accused me of not fulfilling my family obligations, which really turned black and white, which was heartbreaking.
5. Because the defendant did not agree to the divorce, he temporarily refused to reply to the husband and wife's property and creditor's rights.
I am here to convey
County people's court
Shaped people,
20XX May 5th
Attached:
1, the witness of the matchmaker XXXXY
2. The diagnosis certificate of two miscarriages during the marriage relationship.
The woman disagrees with the divorce and replies to model essay 2.
Defendant: anonymous
Because a man filed a divorce lawsuit dispute, the defendant made the following reply to the plaintiff's complaint:
1. The defendant strongly disagreed with the divorce for the following reasons:
The defendant and the plaintiff were introduced, and after they met before marriage, the plaintiff followed the defendant and proposed to the defendant's family three times and five times. Before and after marriage, the plaintiff often went to the defendant's work unit to satisfy the defendant's feelings and had a good relationship.
After marriage, until June 2007, the couple had a good relationship and a harmonious family.
The defendant once had a job. After the plaintiff's mother died, the defendant became pregnant, so she quit her job to concentrate on serving her husband and father-in-law and raising children.
The plaintiff and the plaintiff's family often praised the defendant as a good wife and mother, and the defendant has been intoxicated with family happiness.
In September 2007, the plaintiff's prosecution was like a bolt from the blue. I never imagined that the plaintiff changed so quickly that he went crazy and threatened to send a text message to kill my family and ask the defendant's uncle to collect the body.
What's more, the defendant and the plaintiff have not divorced. At 8 o'clock in the evening on June+10/October 1 June, 65438, it was raining lightly, and the plaintiff refused to let the respondent and his daughter into the house. The defendant asked to take out her daughter's clothes, but the plaintiff refused.
The respondent and his daughter had to stay in the street, which shows how much this person hates his heart.
This left the defendant in the abyss of pain for a long time, and the reasons for the plaintiff's divorce were as follows.
The plaintiff and the plaintiff's family have a very serious feudal thought of preferring sons to daughters and carrying on the family line. After the first child was a girl, the plaintiff tried every means to ask the respondent to resign and evade family planning management, and sold the house twice and moved to the residential area where she now lives, with the fundamental purpose of getting rid of the management and supervision of the plaintiff's unit and plaintiff's colleagues.
Unfortunately, the plaintiff suffered from hepatitis B for many times, and his condition was not effectively controlled.
Nevertheless, the defendant made a compromise and actively cooperated with the plaintiff to have a second child. In the process of preparing to have a second child, when the respondents went to the hospital for medical treatment, they found that they had ovarian cysts and could not have children in a short time.
In this case, the plaintiff deceived himself and became angry from embarrassment, and pushed the responsibility of not having a boy to the defendant. He doesn't like it, and neither does he. The defendant kept a humble attitude to cater to the plaintiff, but ultimately did not call back the plaintiff's tolerance and understanding.
One of the main reasons for the plaintiff's divorce is that she gave birth to a second child boy "legally" through divorce and remarriage.
Another important reason for the plaintiff's divorce is that in recent years, the plaintiff's economic income has increased rapidly, housing and transportation conditions have improved significantly, and his property has accumulated more than one million yuan. The plaintiff's thoughts expanded, his lifestyle degenerated, he often went in and out of star-rated hotels and high-end bath centers, went out early and came home late, stayed out at night, indulged in decadent life, and his outlook on life and world changed qualitatively. He began to dislike his wife and dreamed of life after divorce.
These are the real reasons for the plaintiff's divorce. As for the plaintiff's complaint that the defendant played mahjong, it was purely fabricated facts, and the plaintiff deliberately set a trap to discredit the defendant.
Speaking of playing mahjong, the plaintiff often plays mahjong outside. When the respondent persuaded the plaintiff, the plaintiff also said that playing mahjong was a work need and a way of communication. He often plays mahjong outside all night on the grounds that he is not healthy enough to drink.
Although the plaintiff filed for divorce, the defendant could not agree to divorce, because the defendant lived with the plaintiff for eight years and knew that the plaintiff was not bad in nature and had a good personality. It was not until May 2007, when their affair broke out, that their thoughts changed. In order to keep their daughter from losing her father's love, the defendant has the determination, confidence and ability to save and influence the plaintiff. Legally speaking, the plaintiff's prosecution simply does not meet the conditions of emotional breakdown. So far, the original defendant is still sharing the same bed.
Civil defense of divorce with the woman as the defendant
Civil defense system
Respondent: Zhang X, female, Miao nationality, born on XX 19XX, working in XX Bureau of XX County, address: XX community, telephone number: XXXXXXX.
Respondent: Li X, male, Han nationality, born on XX 19XX, working in XX Middle School, XX County, and telephone number: XXXXXX.
The defendant received a complaint from the plaintiff. The respondent thinks that what the respondent claims is inconsistent with the facts, which is a one-sided statement made by the plaintiff in order to divorce the respondent and monopolize the property of both parties. According to the facts and laws of this case, the respondent hereby pleads as follows:
1. The plaintiff's complaint is inconsistent with the facts.
The respondent claimed that the respondent was addicted to gambling, neglected to take care of housework and children, failed to perform family responsibilities, and didn't know how to respect the old and care for the young, which was totally untrue and totally one-sided by the respondent.
Respondents always respect the old and love the young after marriage, are responsible for the family, are honest and diligent in housework. Respondents did not participate in gambling, and never gambled off their wages.
Second, the neglect and education of children are not the respondents' problems. Instead, the respondent ignored the child.
The defendant's daughter, 20XX Hiuke, was taken care of by the defendant's mother during her hospitalization in the county hospital.
Two months ago, the child slept during the day and cried until dawn at night. The interviewee and his mother (Wang Meiying) took turns hugging and coaxing her. As father's respondents and so-called grandparents, they never hugged their children when they cried at night.
At that time, the child was still young, the respondent was pregnant, and the child's mother-in-law had severe rheumatism, but for the sake of the innocent child, our mother and daughter had to submit to humiliation.
After the full moon, the daughters are all respondents.
Third, the respondent is a male chauvinist with a serious feudal ideology of preferring sons to daughters, and often commits domestic violence against the respondent.
As soon as the defendant married into their family, their family had the idea of preferring sons to daughters. At the beginning of the defendant's pregnancy, they repeatedly expressed the hope that their fat son would carry on the family line.
When we first got married, we had a good relationship. Later, emotional problems occurred mainly because the children of the respondents were girls, so the family members of the respondents began to be biased against the respondents, and they were cynical from time to time.
Later, the respondent and his mother looked for me everywhere, saying that the respondent played mahjong without doing housework. Anyway, they tried their best to get rid of me.
They often threaten to divorce the defendant, marry a woman who has never given birth to a child, and have another boy for their family.
The most serious thing is that at noon in March, 20 1 1, the respondents went to the living room to lie on the sofa and watch TV after eating.
The defendant is feeding his daughter. Seeing that the respondent had finished eating, he went to the living room and asked him to feed her for a few minutes, but the respondent immediately hit the respondent.
Therefore, the respondent requested to divorce at the Civil Affairs Bureau on March 24, 20 1 1.
Later, for the sake of Xiaowa, the respondent put up with it.
However, on May 2 1 day, the family of the respondent did the same thing again, driving the respondent's mother and daughter out of the house and verbally abusing and insulting the respondent's mother together.
Therefore, instead of the respondent complaining that the respondent forcibly took the children and left the house, the respondent drove the respondent and his daughter out of the house.
From the above, it can be seen that the plaintiff's family members have a serious preference for sons over daughters and are not suitable for raising the defendant's daughter XX.
The court ruled that her daughter Zhang XX was raised by the respondent, and the respondent paid her daughter a monthly living allowance of 500 yuan until her daughter reached the age of 18.
Four. Regarding the property of husband and wife during the marriage relationship, the Respondent claims as follows: The Respondent believes that the property generated during the marriage relationship (including the property of husband and wife located in XX District, XX Road, XX Town, XX County) belongs to the property of husband and wife, and the Respondent requests the court to divide the above-mentioned property fairly according to law.
To sum up, the respondent believes that the respondent's claim is untenable, the respondent's preference for boys is true, and the respondent's gambling and running away from home are false, regardless of age; It is true that the respondent intends to monopolize the same property of both parties, but neither party has the same property. It is true that the respondent committed domestic violence, but it is false that the respondent called names and hurt people; It is true that the respondent has a major fault in marriage, but it is false that the respondent has a fault. These are the facts of this case and the root cause of the emotional breakdown between the two sides.
Therefore, the respondent agreed to dissolve the marriage relationship with the respondent, but requested the people's court to divide the respondent and the respondent's property according to law. At the same time, the people's court was requested to award the respondent 20,000 yuan for the mental damage caused by his domestic violence, award the custody of his daughter to the respondent, and let the respondent bear the monthly living expenses of 500 yuan.
I am here to convey
XX county people's court
Respondent: Zhang X.
20XX July 5th