In terms of passive safety, Tesla Model 3 is equipped with a driver's seat, front passenger airbags, front side airbags and front and rear air curtains. In addition, this mode comes with FCW and AEB functional standards.
Tesla Model 3 got M (average) in crashworthiness and maintenance economy, G (excellent) in passenger safety and vehicle auxiliary safety evaluation, and A (good) in layman safety evaluation.
Excellent crashworthiness
I cann't believe I didn't get a p for maintaining the economy
The evaluation results of crashworthiness and maintenance economy of Tesla Model 3 are M (average), the frontal crash score is 1 1.5 (out of 30), and the rear crash score is 23 (out of 30).
In terms of crashworthiness, Tesla Model 3 scored 92% in frontal collision and 100% in rear collision. The body structure performed well, and the body was slightly damaged after the collision. According to the C-IASI low-speed collision evaluation rules, the maximum deformation of Tesla Model 3 measuring point is less than 3 mm ..
In the low-speed crash test, the Tesla Model 3 airbag did not detonate. Due to the common faults of luxury cars, there are many electronic components in the front of the car, and the headlight assembly is more expensive. The maintenance ratio of Tesla Model 3 in front collision is 1 1.50%, and the maintenance cost is about 33,557 yuan, while the maintenance ratio in rear collision is 2.04%, and the maintenance cost is about 5,952.7 yuan. Crashworthiness and maintenance economy are the difficulties of most models at present. It is not easy for Tesla Model 3 to get the M (general) evaluation, which is better than its peers.
The passenger safety index in the car only lost 1 minute.
American version of A-pillar deformation.
The evaluation result of Tesla Model 3 vehicle in occupant safety index is G (excellent), in which the evaluation results of frontal 25% offset collision, side collision, roof strength and whiplash injury are all G (excellent).
In the frontal 25% offset collision, the A-pillar of Tesla Model 3 hardly deformed, the energy absorption area of the front of the car fully played its role, the passenger compartment maintained good integrity, and the frontal airbag, side air curtain and restraint system also effectively played their role. In addition, after the collision, the high-voltage system of Model 3 did not fail. Compared with the previous Model 3 IIHS crash test, the A-pillar of American Model 3 is slightly deformed.
Due to the slight deformation of the lower part of the firewall and the lack of knee airbags, the leg and foot injuries of the dummy of Model 3 were rated as Grade A, but overall, Model 3 performed very well in the 25% offset collision.
In terms of side impact, Tesla Model 3 performed better, and airbags and side air curtains gave the dummy effective protection.
After the side impact, the distance between the Tesla Model 3 B column and the driver's center line is 22.5cm, which is much higher than the excellent standard line of 12.5cm, which is consistent with the test results of IIHS, and also superior to BMW 3 Series (17.5cm) and mercedes benz c Class (20.0cm) at the same price.
In terms of roof strength, the performance of Tesla Model 3 is still stable, and the peak load reaches 93,797 N, which is 5.97 times of its own mass and slightly better than 5.85 times of IIHS.
In terms of seat headrest, the gap between the headrest and the head of Tesla Model 3 is small, the distance from the top of the head is small, and the whiplash injury is light.
The layman rolled over safely.
The performance of the American version is not excellent either.
In terms of pedestrian safety in parking spaces, Model 3 accidentally overturned and got a (good) evaluation.
Judging from the scoring results, Model 3 mainly lost points in the head test, which may be due to the concave-convex design of the front section of Model 3, which led to the collision between the head prosthesis and the internal bones, causing great damage. In the evaluation of IIHS, Model 3 did not get excellent evaluation.
The embodiment of advantages and advantages
Vehicle-assisted safety and stability game
Tesla Model 3 received a G (excellent) evaluation in vehicle auxiliary safety. This type of sensor is millimeter wave radar+three-eye camera, which meets the test requirements under all test conditions and gives an alarm in time. Its AEB function is excellent, which can quickly take emergency braking and reduce the risk of collision.
Generally speaking, the domestic Tesla Model 3 performs well in 25% offset collision, side collision, roof strength and auxiliary safety. Compared with the American version, the security has not shrunk, which is worthy of recognition. However, due to the factors of body design, Model 3 has some shortcomings in pedestrian protection. If the front design of Model S is adopted, the pedestrian protection of Model 3 should be improved. Therefore, it is hoped that under the impetus of evaluation, Model 3 will improve pedestrian protection and further enhance safety in the future.
This article comes from car home, the author of the car manufacturer, and does not represent car home's position.