40 people followed 0 comments.
Write an answer
View all 14 answers
Write an answer
Ok, ok, ok
There are several points
In the first year, Bandai was not officially listed in China, and the genuine models on the market were basically smuggled parallel imports. Therefore, the court's judgment in that year stated that B Company failed to provide evidence to prove its actual losses, and TT did not provide financial statements to prove that it profited from these piracy activities in that year. Therefore, the court finally set a "reasonable compensation" amount, that is, the legal person's personal compensation was more than 1W and more than 4W;
The second meaning of local protection, the judgment of that year did sentence TT to lose the case for infringement, but did not confiscate the production tools such as molds and machines, which really showed the attitude of the government;
The third is that the cost is not directly proportional to the income. I checked the refereeing documents at that time, which said that B Club invested millions in this lawsuit, but what it got was tens of thousands of compensation and the so-called apology and rectification. The following section intercepts one of them:
"We accepted 4/kloc-0 cases of copyright infringement by Bandai Company v. Li Hong Company and Huang Shicheng, and Bandai Company paid the lawyer's fee 1032822. 13 yuan, notarization service fee 13 yuan, information consultation fee 13 yuan.