Yogurt expired 1 min, and the customer claimed 1 1,000 yuan. After the negotiation failed, he went to court. According to the information released by the Judicial Bureau of Wucheng District, Jinhua City, Xiao Li, who sued the merchant for one minute overdue, has reached a settlement with the merchant, and the supermarket will compensate Xiao Li 400 yuan.
The thing is, Xiao Li went to the supermarket to buy things and chose a bottle of yogurt with a price tag of 4.9 yuan. However, after the checkout, Xiao Li found that the shelf life of the sour milk bottle ended at 8: 28 that night, and the checkout time of the receipt was 8: 29 that night. Xiao Li thinks that even one minute overdue is overdue, so she claims 1000 yuan from the supermarket. The two sides failed to reach an agreement after many negotiations, and Xiao Li took the supermarket to court. The local people's mediation committee mediated the matter, and finally the two sides reached an agreement, and Sister He and Xiao Li each compensated 400 yuan.
I think it is worthwhile to sue in court for a bottle of yogurt, which plays an important role in regulating the behavior of merchants. Many people don't understand Xiao Li's behavior. They think it's true that a bottle of yogurt is one minute overdue. Taking the supermarket to court is not worth wasting time and energy. I think it is very worthwhile for him to do so for two main reasons: first, only when consumers are serious, businesses will be serious; Second, Xiao Li has the right to claim compensation, which is more helpful to standardize the behavior of merchants.
Let's start with 1. In daily life, many unscrupulous merchants will take advantage of consumers' unrealistic psychology to sell expired or slightly expired goods to consumers, and most consumers will admit their bad luck out of unrealistic psychology. But it is this self-confessed unlucky behavior that encourages the arrogance of bad businesses and makes more consumers suffer losses. This time, Xiao Li took the supermarket to court, which was a serious act. With this seriousness, the operation of the supermarket will be more serious, and consumers will no longer be troubled.
Secondly, Xiao Li has the right to claim compensation from the supermarket according to law. He himself is willing to call this truth, and we have no reason to accuse him from a moral point of view. In addition, Xiao Li's behavior can undoubtedly regulate the operation of supermarkets. Judging from this incident, supermarkets will definitely pay special attention to expired food to prevent similar incidents from happening again, which plays an important role in regulating business behavior.
Consumers are serious, and the behavior of businesses can be more standardized. If consumers are unwilling to take their legitimate rights and interests seriously, it will only lead to more and more bad businesses, and consumers will be the ultimate victims.