The screenshot of the webpage shows that the Sunshine Community Service Center in Tongguan District of Tongling City released the list of pre-pregnancy eugenics health inspectors in Sunshine Community on August 3 1 Sunday 20 17. Among them, the names and inspection dates of 40 couples were published, of which 77 people's ID numbers were completely presented, and only the address of their current residence was blurred in the list. In the "20 17 Pre-pregnancy Eugenics Checklist" issued by Cuihu Community in Tongguan District, the names and inspection dates of 23 couples were also fully disclosed.
Yesterday (8th) morning, Jiang, secretary of the Party Working Committee of Cuihu Community in Tongguan District and director of the public service center, told the Voice of China reporter that in the pre-pregnancy eugenics information released earlier, the community did neglect the protection of residents' personal information due to staff mistakes. "Strictly speaking, it is not very standardized to publish the name on the pre-pregnancy eugenics information, but the address and contact information are not made public. This is the fault of our staff. Some businesses in grassroots work are not very standardized, so it also affects residents. "
Jiang said that corresponding rectification measures have been taken in time. "We got the information and all the rectifications were put in place in the first time. Now we are arranging relevant personnel one after another, and the leaders will lead a team to visit one by one to explain and apologize, which has affected others after all. At the same time, the relevant responsible personnel were also admonished to talk and cancel the qualification of the year's awards. We must draw inferences from this incident to prevent similar incidents from happening again. At the same time, for the future information disclosure work, all departments are required to disclose it after approval by the leaders in charge in accordance with the requirements of superiors. "
It is understood that similar pages that disclose residents' personal information also appear in public information pages published by many township community service centers such as Tongguan District People's Community Service Center and Henggang Community Service Center. In this regard, the relevant person in charge of the Information Section of the Tongling Municipal Government Office said that it is understood that most of the web pages that leaked personal information were published as special financial achievements. "Grassroots communities generally involve information such as subsistence allowances and social assistance. He didn't notice the time when the information was released publicly, and published statistical tables including ID numbers. When it comes to personal privacy, there are not many related, only a few communities. "
The person in charge said that at present, in addition to timely rectification of relevant information, the information disclosure content released by grassroots communities in towns and villages in all districts and counties of the city has been inspected to prevent similar incidents. "Like us, information disclosure is under strict scrutiny, and this kind of thing should not happen. When problems are found, they should be rectified in time, and grass-roots departments in counties and districts should be organized to rectify in time, and information should be deleted, which involves personal modification. The published list includes funds and does not need to be published in detail. "
Yesterday (8th) at noon, I logged into the Tongling Municipal Government Information Open Network, and found that the relevant web pages involving the disclosure of personal information of residents have been deleted, and the last four digits of the resident ID number in some web pages were replaced by asterisks. As a guarantee for citizens, legal persons and other organizations to obtain government information according to law, how should government information disclosure protect personal privacy?
The relevant person in charge of the Information Department of Tongling Municipal Government Office said that the information disclosure of government agencies at all levels in Anhui Province should strictly follow the principles of "who is open, who is audited and who is responsible" and "who is audited and who is open". "At present, the country attaches great importance to the openness of government affairs from top to bottom, except for non-disclosure. At the same time, it must comply with the "Regulations on the Openness of Information in People's Republic of China (PRC)", and governments at all levels must strictly control confidentiality and confidentiality. The municipal government requires all districts and counties to check all information, including all townships and grassroots communities, and rectify problems in time. "
According to Article 14 of the Regulations on the Openness of Government Information in People's Republic of China (PRC), administrative organs shall not disclose government information involving state secrets, commercial secrets and personal privacy. However, government information involving commercial secrets and personal privacy, which may have a significant impact on public interests, may be disclosed with the consent of the obligee or not disclosed by the administrative organ.
According to Wang Conghu, a professor at the School of Public Administration of China Renmin University, this incident stems from the lack of awareness of protecting citizens' personal privacy. "Personal information includes your home address and ID number. From the perspective of public cognition, this is obviously a personal privacy issue. With the development of science and technology, information is becoming more and more open and transparent, and we may lack the awareness of protecting citizens' privacy. So I think the first is the problem of consciousness, and the second is the problem of standardization. "
Wang Conghu said that at this stage, in order to balance the right to know and the right to privacy in government information disclosure, we can consider exploring some systems in relevant industries or places. "If we have such laws or policies, it may be better, so we may need some places to try them out first and do some experimental and local laws or legal explorations to protect personal privacy. For example, some units can formulate some internal rules and restraint mechanisms. Based on the emergence of this case, it can also be an opportunity for us to further formulate rules and regulations. "
I hope to find out as soon as possible.