turn
1. Tell me about the testing process.
Feeling: I think this is the most basic knowledge that testers should have, but as an interviewer,
I don't see theory guiding practice, but the obvious feeling is that theory is practice.
Response: He actually told me that the person who writes the case depends on the overall design and detailed design. I
I wonder, if so, what role does the scheme designer of the case personnel at the next higher level have?
In my opinion, case writers are lower than PLAN in terms of ability and cognition of needs.
Designers. His duty is to help improve the plan and provide guidance to his next-level testers.
The basis of production line use cases. Instead of denying the design of the plan, it is better to waste a lot of time doing some heavy work.
After work. After all, the design of the plan has been reviewed many times.
2. Why not write the requirement design of the test in the process?
Feelings: I think PLAN standardizes this design problem to some extent. If the plan is based on
The specification is being written, and time pressure may be a guest appearance for testers to test, which I am puzzled.
It's really terrible to copy the theory completely.
Response: He told me that big companies are like this. I have also interviewed 2-3 large foreign listed companies.
I didn't find anything like this. I wonder, how much pressure does this bring to the exam?
3. Views and understanding of white box and black box testing
Feeling: empty. I think theory determines practice in this company.
Response: No, I didn't comment on my answer, because I was repeating it completely according to the theory.
Your database is good. How to merge two unrelated tables?
Feeling: It's still very empty, which is rarely used in reality. I don't understand what his purpose is.
Response: My answer: I remember it was UNION, and he told me it was JOIN.
5. You used to be a developer. What do you mean by flying over?
Feeling: I am making things difficult and angry. I'm just saying I don't know. Imagine being a JAVA developer for two years.
How come you don't even know the most basic overload?
Response: None
Summary: I think as a foreign company, the examiner represents the image and reality of QA and QC teams.
Force. At the same time, it is also the image of the company to a certain extent, but it is very disappointing. In practical work
In my work, I didn't find any real value in any questions asked by the examiner.
This can only make me feel that the exam is a mirage, my 5 years of work experience and my 3
Several years of study, although very short, but I participated in every stage of the software Liftcycle.
Passing by. I think testing is a very practical work, and any mistakes in the work are possible.
Cause an irreversible situation, but this is not determined by theory.
As a tester who loves his post, the company is very concerned about the testers.
The degree of recognition, whether you believe that the product has passed the test of your own testing team, you can confidently tell everyone.
Our products are the best. These are very important for testers' confidence and later work.
Important. At the same time, can you give the test a good development space and let them grow rapidly?
I think the company's income far exceeds his investment. At the same time, the leader's
Coordination and communication skills play a very important role in the team.
I didn't see any of this in the examiner's interview. Maybe Tata is right.
The requirements are too high, which may be due to my lack of testing knowledge. ...
;