According to the survey, SF is involved in hundreds of transportation contract disputes. Why are contract disputes frequent in express delivery industry?

First of all, it is the responsibility of the courier company to subcontract the courier service to individuals in violation of regulations. If a king does not have the qualification to operate express delivery business, he contracts the business to express delivery company A, and his subcontracting behavior is essentially to illegally transfer the road transport business license to the road transport business operated by unqualified people, which violates the administrative license. , to avoid the relevant national industry access system, it should be given a negative evaluation according to law. Now Xu asked a courier company and Wang to bear joint liability for compensation, and the court supported it.

Secondly, because the package was put into the express cabinet without permission. From the perspective of real life, the emergence of express cabinets has indeed solved the logistics and transportation to a great extent? The last mile? The problem can not only improve the delivery efficiency of couriers, but also facilitate the recipients to pick up the pieces, but it is undeniable that this new thing has also been given to some couriers? Lazy? Opportunity, because it is not uncommon for the courier to put the courier into the courier cabinet without the consent of the recipient.

In addition, the express goods are lost. Mr. Ren, a citizen of An, reported to the 24-hour news hotline of Huashang Daily that he sent cosmetics worth 5 10 yuan to Shaoyang City, Hunan Province through Shentong Express, but after four days of inquiring about logistics, he found that only half of the logistics information was available. I sent something to Hunan before, and it should arrive in about four days. There has been no news this time. ? In desperation, Mr. Ren complained to the headquarters of Shentong Express, and the other party said that the relevant outlets would be notified after the investigation was completed. Quick solution. About 10 days later, Mr. Ren received a call from Complaint Network again. He received compensation from 5 10 yuan after providing the invoice photos to the other party.

It is necessary to define the compensation obligor and reduce the litigation cost. All companies in the sender's area that contain the words brand express company are regarded as defendants in this case. Under the above circumstances, the litigant will make mistakes, resulting in a waste of litigation time, energy and expenses. It is suggested that the sender can accurately determine the compensation obligor according to the regional cooperation company shown by the courier company official website and the revoked business license for operating online stores, so as to avoid unnecessary litigation caused by improper prosecution.