Honor: the affirmation and praise of people's moral behavior in fulfilling social obligations by society or groups is a professional and qualitative positive evaluation that specific people get from specific organizations. Conscious of the moral feelings generated by this affirmation and praise is called sense of honor. In China, Mencius used the concept of honor and disgrace for the first time from the ethical point of view: "Benevolence means glory, and benevolence means humiliation."
Honor is a social and historical category. Different societies or different classes have different or even opposite evaluations of the same behavior. For example, in history, for manual labor, the exploiting class was ashamed of labor, while the workers were proud of hard work. The acquisition of honor is closely related to the performance of moral obligations, and faithful performance of obligations to society, class or others is the premise of obtaining honor.
Concepts and basic characteristics
Although honor and reputation are both evaluations, there are similarities in this respect, but compared with reputation, honor has its unique legal characteristics:
First, honor is an evaluation given by social organizations, not a general social evaluation.
Second, honor is a positive evaluation given by social organizations, not a negative evaluation.
Third, honor is a formal evaluation given by social organizations, not a random evaluation.
Fourth, honor is the evaluation of social organizations obtained by civil subjects according to their exemplary behavior, rather than naturally occurring.
First, honor is an evaluation given by social organizations, not a general social evaluation. As a social evaluation, reputation comes from the public. Honor is not the evaluation of the public, but the evaluation of a specific person by the government, associations, subordinate units or other organizations.
Second, honor is a positive evaluation, not a negative evaluation. As a comprehensive evaluation of a specific person's conduct, ability, talent and performance, reputation includes both positive and negative evaluations. But honor, as a social evaluation, is definitely a positive evaluation, that is, a positive and positive evaluation of a person.
Third, honor is a formal evaluation given by social organizations, not a casual evaluation. This social evaluation of reputation is an evaluation made freely by the public, but honor is different. It must be a formal evaluation made by social organizations based on a person's outstanding performance or contribution in some aspect.
For more information about project/service/procurement bidding, and to improve the winning rate, please click on the bottom of official website Customer Service for free consultation:/#/? source=bdzd