Huibo charging standard

Huibo charges are as follows:

1, parking for more than 30 minutes (including 30 minutes) to less than 2 hours (including 2 hours), 3 yuan for small and medium-sized vehicles, 5 yuan for large vehicles, and 0 yuan for motorcycles. Less than 2 hours, according to 2 hours.

2, parking for more than 2 hours, more than 2 hours, each increase 1 hour, small and medium-sized vehicles charge 2 yuan/train, large vehicles charge 4 yuan/train; Motorcycles are charged at 1 yuan/trip, and if there is less than 1 hour, it will be 1 hour.

3. The maximum charging standard for parking within 24 hours is: small and medium-sized vehicles do not exceed 30 yuan, large vehicles do not exceed 50 yuan, and motorcycles do not exceed 10 yuan. Parking service charges for special circumstances such as more than 24 hours shall be determined by the parking lot management and the owner through consultation.

Reduce the first-and second-class regional charging standards. The first-class regional highway toll standard is reduced from 2.5 yuan/15 minutes in the first two hours to 1.5 yuan/15 minutes, and then to 2.0 yuan/15 minutes in two hours; The first-class regional secondary roads and the second-class regional primary roads are reduced from 2.0 yuan/15 minutes in the first two hours to15 minutes in 0 yuan/15 minutes in the second hour 1.5 yuan/15 minutes; Secondary roads in secondary areas are reduced from 1.5 yuan/15 minutes to 1.0 yuan/15 minutes.

Huibo's problem

Nanning Huibo parking incident is a typical case of urban governance anomie. On the surface, this is an economic dispute involving the interests of state-owned enterprises, courts and banks. But from a deeper perspective, this is a governance crisis, exposing the defects and loopholes of urban management system, mechanism and system.

Media reporters found in official website of Nanning Municipal Government that this charging item was not included in the Nanning Administrative Fees Catalogue updated on June 30, 2022. Peng Ke, a researcher at the Center for Constitutional and Administrative Law of Peking University Law School, said that this means that the parking fee charged by Nanning Huibo Company did not enter the financial channel.