Which institutions do the most professional performance evaluation?

There are three basic types of performance evaluation subjects in China, namely, individual citizens, specialized performance evaluation institutions of intermediary nature and specialized performance evaluation institutions of state organs. Intermediary professional performance evaluation agencies are also called third-party professional evaluation agencies. This evaluation subject evaluates a specific government performance project by signing an entrustment contract with the government. In China, most of these evaluation institutions are research institutions in universities and participate in the process of government performance evaluation for the purpose of academic research. For example, China Local Government Performance Evaluation Center of Lanzhou University is an institution specializing in government performance evaluation. China Local Government Performance Evaluation Center of Lanzhou University has established a scientific index system. According to the questionnaire survey, evaluation of major economic and social development indicators, field visits and other procedures. The evaluation model is constructed by multi-agent scoring and other factors, and the evaluation results are comprehensively analyzed by SPSS statistical software, which has attracted the attention of the government, academia and all walks of life and is called Lanzhou Experiment by the media. Some district and county governments in Beijing entrusted Zero Research Consulting Group, a well-known consulting organization in China, to carry out government affairs environmental performance evaluation, and Public Policy Research Center of South China University of Technology to carry out performance evaluation activities of two levels of government in Guangdong Province. These are typical third-party participation in government performance evaluation in China.

There are also many companies doing well in China. The key is to pay attention to a combination and fate. I recommend several better companies in the industry: Beijing Hejun, Luo Zhengjun, Shanghai Shuozhi Consulting, Hundred Shield and so on.

I hope it helps you.

What is the people's spiritual realm research institute?

1990165438+1On October 27th, Qian Xuesen mentioned in his letter to Academician Wang Cheng that virtual reality may be man-made scenery or spiritual scenery. He said that he likes supernatural scenery very much and has a strong Chinese flavor. When Qian Xuesen understood virtual reality technology (VR technology), he thought of applying it to the level of man-machine integration and human brain development, and named it spiritual realm. Qian Lao believes that the emergence and development of spiritual technology will expand the perception of human brain and the experience of man-machine integration. 2/kloc-0 In the second half of the century, people and computers will enter an era of deep integration.

The official cultivation of immortals began. Don't interrupt, because don't be too blatant and too open, which may attract the attention of western forces. So, try a small institution to test the water first. It's no big deal, right?

What impact does the delisting and demotion of star-rated scenic spots have on scenic spot management?

Deletion and demotion. For the scenic spot, it should not be affected. How to manage!

People are concerned about:

The level has dropped. Will the fare be reduced?

It used to be the highest-level scenic spot, but later it was downgraded for various reasons. If the plane ticket is still at the old price, it is definitely unreasonable!

Anyway, I don't know what 2A, 3A, 4A and 5A are based on.

But many times I think:

High-rise buildings may not have good scenery, but low-rise buildings are better than expected!

I have a way to shock mountains and tigers, set an example for major scenic spots and improve the quality of their own scenic spots!

No need to downgrade!

Free for five years!

Five years is not enough to avoid ten years!

In this way, there is no need for the supervision of the tourism bureau, and the scenic spot itself can play to the extreme, be strict with itself and never let itself be criticized and punished!

The star system of scenic spots is a system to publicize and promote high-quality tourism services. Once a scenic spot is rated as 4A or 5A, it means that it has a golden signboard and even has the qualification to sell high-priced tickets. But for a long time, the star hat of the scenic spot has only been worn off, which makes some places declare the star scenic spot as a static one-time transaction. In obtaining

In the past two years, the Ministry of Culture and Tourism has set off a storm of delisting scenic spots, and more than 400 scenic spots have been delisted, downgraded or warned, which shows the determination to control the ills of tourism services in scenic spots. Similarly, delisting and demotion is not the ultimate goal of scenic spot management, but the hope is to let the scenic spot go up and down, in and out.

Therefore, sorting out the problems involved in this circular and issuing warnings to various scenic spots will further reflect the deep-seated problems of current tourism market supervision. As experts pointed out, some places go all out to strive for A-level scenic spots, but after success, they relax and neglect maintenance, which leads to problems in the service quality of scenic spots. In addition, for a long time, the supervision of the tourism market in various places has been too loose, and the inaction of the relevant regulatory authorities has given all kinds of chaos a chance to take root.

In this regard, after the delisting of scenic spots around the country, we should learn painful lessons, carry out thorough rectification, save the reputation of scenic spots, and strive to improve the management, operation and service level of scenic spots. As for the management department, it is necessary to carry out long-term and effective dynamic supervision on the scenic spots that have been delisted, downgraded, severely warned, warned and informed criticism, adjust the scenic spots that have been actively rectified and praised by tourists within a certain period of time, and increase the punishment for those scenic spots that are indifferent and bent on their own way to ensure that the effect of punishment and rectification is implemented.

On the other hand, scenic spots must get rid of the stereotype of ticket economy. Only by adhering to the public welfare nature of scenic spots can we pay attention to cultural innovation, optimize product structure, extend industrial chain, realize the sustainable development of scenic spots, and strive to cultivate tourism into a strategic pillar industry of the national economy and a modern service industry that the people are more satisfied with. At the same time, we should realize that simply selling scenic spots is not a long-term solution for the development of tourism. Supporting development, excellent service, cultural excavation and diversified modes are the signs of tourism maturity.

In short, for the awarding and delisting of scenic spots at all levels, it is necessary to form a dynamic management, which can be promoted or lowered, and can be awarded or picked. For serious problems, one chooses one, finds one, and falls behind one, so that demotion or even delisting becomes the norm, which makes all scenic spots have a sense of crisis and forces them to improve their service quality and management level.