I got Guangzhou Automobile New Energy Aion in Beijing a few days ago. LX's long-life test drive, test drive for three days, still don't know how to write an experience draft (I had a good idea after touching the car for half an hour). For the test and evaluation of this car, I am still a little scared, not the manufacturer, but the reader.
First of all, this is a domestic car. Followed by pure electric vehicles. I don't know when it started, but a strange phenomenon appeared on the Internet, that is, criticizing a car casually can always get everyone's praise. Everyone thinks that this is the so-called objectivity, conscience, and confiscation of money from manufacturers. Praising some advantages of a car becomes just a performance of a meal.
In the camp of criticizing independent brands, the most active people are a group of people who criticize independent brands of pure electric vehicles. Their common words are: electric vehicle endurance fraud; Electric vehicles dare not turn on air conditioning in summer; The risk of spontaneous combustion of electric vehicles is high; Poor driving quality of electric vehicles and so on.
In fact, at present, electric vehicles do have many shortcomings, but compared with fuel vehicles, electric vehicles also have many inherent advantages.
For example, going to work in commuting cost is lower; The active safety performance is stronger; The cockpit is smarter; The output of power is more direct and linear; The shape design is more fashionable and so on. Therefore, the existence of electric vehicles is valuable and reasonable, but some people use electric vehicles to operate in order to circle the powder and expand their influence, which has already conveyed wrong views to consumers and caused great harm to the industry.
As we all know, secularism is a torrent, and it takes a lot of courage to stand up, so I dare not easily evaluate the good of electric cars.
Today I want to evaluate Aion from two angles. The performance of LX also made everyone feel the absurdity and truth of car critics.
The first is the shape design: if I describe it according to the normal experience, I will say Aion? LX adopts the front face design of cloud arrow penetrating the heart, and the front chrome grille runs through the whole headlight, which makes the visual effect of the front face wider and the atmosphere calm.
Secondly, the hub is designed like a space car, which is full of science fiction and can reduce wind resistance; Finally, the hollow-pressed tail design is not only beautiful, but also makes the drag coefficient of the whole vehicle reach 0.28Cd, which is also a high level in the whole coupe medium-sized SUV.
But if you think about it carefully, you will definitely be scolded for saying this, so I think you have to say this about the shape design.
Eternal tower? LX doesn't seem to have a Tesla model? X is so recognizable, the design of the through rear taillight is terrible, and there is no innovation. Hub cover looks like science fiction, but it's flashy, and it's not cheap to scratch it and change it. Generally speaking, it belongs to a car with general design and poor practicability.
Compared with the first statement, does the second statement give people a more rational and objective feeling? At the thought of this, my heart suddenly settled a lot.
Next, talk about the interior of the cockpit: get in the car, Aion? LX？ 12.3 inch central control compound large screen makes people feel full of science and technology, and its processing technology adopts integrated cold bending screen, which is not only beautiful, but also convenient for drivers to obtain information. However, compared with Mercedes-Benz's flat duplex big screen, Aion? The processing technology of LX cold bending screen is more difficult and costly.
Some physical buttons with common functions are reserved at the bottom of the central control, which is more conducive to blind operation. Didn't take the Tesla model x？ That radical way.
Is the car system independent? One of the highlights of LX is that interactive logic and voice control are very easy to use. Besides, Aion? The instrument panel and central control panel of LX have achieved deep integration and intercommunication. The high-definition map in the driving process of the central control vehicle can be completely placed on the driver's screen, which completely solves the problem of multi-purpose of the central control screen.
The interior materials are also very kind. The door panels, seats and the roof are all made of fur, which has a delicate touch and a taste of luxury SUV.
Eternal tower? The wheelbase of LX is close to 3 meters, so the interior space is very spacious. Edit height 176cm. After adjusting the driver's seat posture, there is one more punch in the back head space and two more punches in the legs.
In addition, this model with a price of 270,000 has a rear boss button. Whether you use it or not, you will have a sense of class with this configuration.
Do you feel good? But if you think about it carefully, you can't say that. I didn't say anything wrong. Definitely not objective enough. I should say so.
Into the tower of eternity? LX cockpit, one-piece imitation Mercedes-Benz big screen, without any innovation of its own. Moreover, such a large screen will definitely affect the driving sight, and some physical buttons are not as sci-fi as Tesla, which is strange. Secondly, the liftable shift lever is copied from Land Rover at first glance, and there is no innovation.
Most of the whole car is made of suede fabric, which looks high-grade but not resistant to dirt. It is purely a sample. Who will install boss key in a family car? There's plenty of room. I don't deal in freight girls.
Hey? Beautiful! Presumably, Keyboard Man will say, "There are not many car critics who dare to tell the truth. They have a conscience and a backbone, and they are giants of the times! "
Finally, what about Aion? The test drive feeling of LX, I got Aion? The 80-long battery life version of LX (NEDC battery life 650km) costs 279,600 yuan.
In terms of power, the predecessor layout is adopted. The maximum power 150kw, the maximum torque is 350 Nm, and the measured acceleration of 100km is 7.9S, which is faster than most fuel vehicles of the same class. If it is not fast enough, you can also choose the four-wheel drive version, which accelerates by 3.9S per 100 kilometers.
The chassis adopts front McPherson and rear multi-link independent suspension with Michelin comfort tires, which is good for daily walking comfort.
The driving mode and energy recovery mode can be customized and adjusted, and there is no such thing as' strong braking energy recovery texture'. Therefore, from the perspective of family car, this car is definitely faster, more economical and more comfortable than the fuel car with the same price (provided that it is convenient for daily charging).
Finally, talk about battery life. The test drive model is equipped with 80-degree contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd. NCM8 1 1 battery, and NEDC has a battery life of 650km. Because the endurance time is too long, it is impossible to do a detailed endurance test, but editing the recent driving data can give you a general endurance reference.
Route: block e of wangjing youlehui to the vicinity of Shimen subway station;
Driving mode: ECO is selected as the driving mode, and braking energy recovery defaults (non-single pedal mode);
Vehicle load: one driver, automatic air conditioning and infotainment system working normally;
Before departure, the instrument shows the remaining cruising range of 628km, and the destination instrument shows the remaining cruising range of 582km. The actual mileage is 40km, and the instrument shows that the fuel consumption is 46km. The calculated energy consumption rate is 86.96%; According to the cruising range, the actual cruising range of the car should be around 565.438+0 km.
This is the endurance value obtained by standing in the daily driving scene of an ordinary consumer. During the driving process, the editor did not turn off the air conditioner or turn on the single pedal mode, deliberately creating a very high value (mainly because he did not want to insult everyone's IQ). So I think it is a good answer to finally get the actual endurance parameters of 565km.
Of course, I just made another common-sense mistake-I didn't say anything about shortcomings. In the eyes of Keyboard Man, domestic electric cars are stuck in traffic jams and cannot turn on the air conditioner. At least 50% off the battery life, the charging queue is too bright. Even after the old Wang Mai next door bought an electric car, his wife was so angry that she divorced.
Therefore, for the evaluation of the endurance of this kind of electric vehicle, it should be said: I don't have to test it as soon as I see it is a domestic electric vehicle. My intuition knows that its battery life will not be long, even if it is long, it is fake. I think my intuition can't be wrong.
Keyboard man: "objective and fair, conscientious, mainstay, giant of the times!" " "
Write at the end:
Back to the topic: "Is it easy to be a car critic?"
I don't think so.
Some time ago, Jin Yucheng, a Shanghai writer (the novel "Shanghai, bloom" won the Mao Dun Literature Prize), said on the program about the word love rat: "I don't know who coined this word, it sucks! Man himself is the most complicated thing, and such a complicated change of human nature can be summarized in such a low-energy sentence. It's really childish and sad. "
In fact, getting on the bus is the same as people. Most cars can't be summarized by a simple word "good car" or "bad car" (except Zhongtai, etc.). Moreover, the standards for car critics to evaluate cars are also very complicated, all of which are centered on self-cognition.
For example, A thinks that the Audi A3 is very small, and people who buy this kind of car are purely for the Audi logo, even a little vain. But B thinks A3 is the prototype of WTCR Audi, with short wheelbase, 2.0T? EA888 is a powerful tool for drivers. People who buy A3 have the belief of WTCR and the pursuit of extreme driving.
Is it a fault or b fault? I don't think so. Therefore, the objectivity advertised by car critics does not exist in a sense.
The most difficult thing for car critics is not not to cater to manufacturers, but to cater to consumers. They should not enlarge the shortcomings of a car to cater to some psychological needs of consumers, so as to achieve the purpose of getting attention. The real purpose is not to cater to manufacturers or consumers, but to output their own opinions independently.
what do you think?
This article comes from car home, the author of the car manufacturer, and does not represent car home's position.