First, the significance of the Supreme People's Court's questioning the height limit
Restricting high consumption, as a compulsory enforcement measure, aims to urge the enforced person to fulfill his legal obligations as soon as possible. By inquiring about the Supreme People's Court's height limit, the creditor can know the consumption limit of the person subjected to execution, which is helpful to judge his performance ability and make a more informed decision. At the same time, for the person subjected to execution, knowing his own situation of restricting high consumption will also help him to fulfill his obligations on his own initiative and avoid further legal consequences.
Second, how to inquire about the height limit in the Supreme People's Court?
1. Log on to the official website of the Supreme People's Court: firstly, you need to log on to the official website of the Supreme People's Court or the related implementation information disclosure platform.
2. Input inquiry information: find the corresponding inquiry entry on the website and input the name, ID number or other relevant information of the inquired person.
3. Obtain query results: the system queries according to the input information and displays the corresponding results. These results usually include information such as whether the inquired person restricts high consumption and the specific content of restricting high consumption.
Third, matters needing attention
When inquiring about the height limit of the Supreme People's Court, we should pay attention to the following points:
1. Ensure the accuracy of the query information: the information of the inquired person should be accurate to avoid the deviation of the query results.
2. Protect personal privacy: In the process of inquiry, you should abide by relevant laws and regulations, respect the privacy of others, and do not use the inquiry results for illegal purposes.
3. Understand the legal effect of the inquiry result: The inquiry result of the Supreme People's Court height limit has certain legal effect, but it is not the final legal ruling. If in doubt, it is recommended to consult a professional lawyer or legal institution.
To sum up:
The Supreme People's Court's inquiry about the height limit is an important way to understand the situation of the enforced person's restriction on high consumption, which is helpful for creditors to make decisions and urge the enforced person to fulfill their obligations. When making an inquiry, we should ensure the accuracy of the inquiry information, abide by relevant laws and regulations, and understand the legal effect of the inquiry results.
Legal basis:
People's Republic of China (PRC) Civil Procedure Law
Article 255 provides that:
If the person subjected to execution fails to perform the obligations specified in the legal documents, the people's court may take or notify the relevant units to assist in taking measures such as restricting exit, recording in the credit information system, publishing information on non-performance of obligations through the media and other measures prescribed by law.
Provisions of the Supreme People's Court Municipality on Restricting the High Consumption of the Executed Person
Article 1 stipulates:
If the person subjected to execution fails to fulfill the payment obligations specified in the effective legal documents within the time limit specified in the enforcement notice, the people's court may take measures to limit his high consumption and related consumption that is not necessary for life and career.
"Several Provisions of the Supreme People's Court Municipality on Publishing the Information of the List of Persons Executed in Disbelief"
Article 1 stipulates:
If the person subjected to execution fails to fulfill the obligations specified in the effective legal documents, and under any of the following circumstances, the people's court shall include him in the list of people subjected to execution for breach of trust and impose credit punishment on him according to law:
(1) Having the ability to perform and refusing to perform the obligations specified in the effective legal documents;
(2) Obstructing or resisting execution by forging evidence, violence or threats;
(3) evading execution by means of false litigation, false arbitration or concealing or transferring property;
(4) Violating the property reporting system;
(5) Violating the consumption restriction order;
(6) refusing to perform the settlement agreement without justifiable reasons.