How to use novelty retrieval points in novelty retrieval report

How to make use of the novelty points in the novelty report? According to the novelty points of the project, the detected documents should be sorted out and the documents that do not meet the requirements should be eliminated. Through the correlation analysis of the detected documents one by one, a reasonable number of comparison documents can be selected as reference in the novelty conclusion. Sci-tech novelty retrieval is a kind of sci-tech information consulting service produced and developed in the process of China's sci-tech management system reform. 1. Literature retrieval should focus on novelty retrieval, which is a scientific and technological information consulting service produced and developed during the reform of China's scientific and technological management system. Sci-tech novelty retrieval reports are mainly used in the examination and approval procedures of sci-tech projects, sci-tech plans or fund applications, achievement appraisal and awards, project review and acceptance, transformation of scientific and technological achievements, new product development, etc., which provide comprehensive, accurate and objective literature basis for evaluation experts and ensure the scientificity and impartiality of project evaluation. Sci-tech novelty retrieval is a retrieval conducted by novelty retrieval institutions. By comparing and analyzing the publicly reported literatures with novelty retrieval points, a novel conclusion is drawn. The judgment of novelty is based on the same exclusion principle, that is, if the novelty retrieval project is essentially the same as the published comparison document in the fields of science and technology, research purpose, technical scheme and expected effect, it can be judged that the project lacks novelty. The key to grasp novelty lies in the novelty inspector's thorough understanding of the innovation of novelty retrieval project, so that the detected documents can be accurately compared with the innovation of the project, so that the judgment of novelty can be based on evidence. The main means of sci-tech novelty retrieval is retrieval, that is, the process and method of finding and obtaining the required information from many sci-tech documents. Detecting the novelty of an item is based on the novelty point, not the whole content of the novelty item, so the literature retrieval should focus on the novelty point, and the standard of measurement is to see whether the technical content in the detected document is consistent with the novelty point. There can be one or more novelty retrieval points around which closely related and generally related documents can be detected. The so-called relevant documents should be documents whose technical contents are consistent with all or part of the information of the novelty retrieval point of the project. 2. The comparative analysis and identification of closely related and general related documents refers to the degree of consistency between the contents of documents and the contents of novelty retrieval points of projects, which is determined according to the number of novelty retrieval points that can be covered by documents. Related documents are often divided into closely related documents and general related documents. Closely related literature refers to the related literature which is the same as the novelty of novelty retrieval items, but denies the novelty of novelty retrieval items alone. General related literature refers to the related literature with the same novelty as the novelty of novelty retrieval items, and does not deny the novelty of novelty retrieval items alone. Close correlation is relative to general correlation, and it needs to be analyzed and compared with novelty retrieval items before it can be determined. When judging the novelty of novelty retrieval items, it is necessary to compare and analyze the literatures. In the analysis, the principle of independent comparison can be adopted, that is, each novelty of the novelty retrieval project is compared with the related contents disclosed in each comparison file, and it is not allowed to compare with the combination of related contents disclosed in multiple comparison files, nor is it allowed to compare with the combination of multiple technical solutions in one comparison file. Nor should one document be required to cover all the novel points for comparison. Through the comparative analysis of relevant documents, it is necessary to identify and keep closely related documents for use in the report. For those documents that are generally or not closely related, we should consider adjusting the retrieval strategy and make up the search in multiple databases around the novelty points to avoid missing the search. Therefore, it is necessary to compare the detected files and master the comparison standards. 3. According to the comparison principle of related literatures, the number of literatures should be reasonably selected. Through the correlation analysis of the detected documents one by one, the most closely related documents and general related documents are found out, and they are selected and used according to the needs of the novelty conclusion. Comparative analysis should cite highly relevant literature, and the content should be as relevant as possible to novelty retrieval, especially closely related literature. Closely related literature is the main basis for comparative analysis, but not all novelty items have closely related literature. In the practice of sci-tech novelty retrieval, sometimes after repeatedly adjusting the retrieval strategy, or expanding the retrieval scope, or making up a novelty point, there is still no closely related literature. At this time, it is necessary to expand the selection range of comparative literature to general related literature or similar research literature to provide necessary literature support for novelty retrieval conclusions. Sci-tech novelty retrieval must be carried out under the condition that the relevant literature is not zero, so. As long as the retrieval strategy is correct, almost all relevant documents can be detected more or less. Only when the novelty retrieval project is really invented or original, it is possible that there is no relevant literature at a certain novelty retrieval point in the retrieval results. Usually, there are more related documents detected in popular subjects or comprehensive research projects, but less in soft topics or unpopular industries. In practical work, many of our novelty retrieval personnel often encounter the following problems, that is, how to list closely related and generally related documents in the sci-tech novelty retrieval report, and whether it is necessary to list generally related documents in the report. How many closely related documents should be properly selected for novelty retrieval points? The author thinks that the reasonable number of comparative literature should be determined according to specific topics, and the principle is to support the conclusion of novelty retrieval. When a novelty is original, its novelty can only be proved by comparing with a large number of related materials. However, when a novelty retrieval point is not original, it is only necessary to find closely related documents that can deny its novelty. Therefore, in general, it is suggested that about 10 articles should be selected reasonably in the novelty retrieval report, with at least 6 articles as the best. Among them, closely related documents should be given priority to, supplemented by general related documents. 4. Pay attention to the standardization of novelty retrieval points in practical work to ensure the quality level of novelty retrieval reports. In the current work, how to ask the entrusting unit of project novelty retrieval to write a standardized and reasonable project introduction, especially how to standardize novelty retrieval points, is an important topic in our sci-tech novelty retrieval work. Because they don't have a deep understanding of the project prospect, the situation of the same industry and the market, especially the sci-tech novelty retrieval work, they can't describe the project overview and novelty retrieval points clearly, so they can't come up with a standardized and satisfactory novelty retrieval entrustment contract, which brings certain difficulties to the follow-up sci-tech novelty retrieval work. In practical work, we feel that the novelty retrieval points of general patent projects are easy to list, while the novelty retrieval points of large-scale projects, especially those of soft projects, are not easy to refine and summarize because the core technology involves interdisciplinary. In these projects, how to help the entrusting party standardize and refine the novelty retrieval points, so as to successfully complete the retrieval and issue a reasonable novelty retrieval report is an important topic. Therefore, the entrusting unit should be helped to fully realize that the novelty retrieval point is an innovation provided by the entrusting party of novelty retrieval project, and it is the basis of the whole process of novelty retrieval and literature analysis and comparison. Whether it is a patent project, a large-scale or new-type project involving multiple disciplines, or a soft science research project, each novelty retrieval point should be clear and accurate. The specification requires that the entrusting unit of project novelty retrieval should be concise, thorough and clear, and cooperate closely with the entrusting party to assist the entrusting party to adjust the novelty retrieval points appropriately. At the same time, every novelty inspector is required to follow the principle of seeking truth from facts and treat each project with rigorous and meticulous analysis. And constantly update knowledge, improve their comprehensive quality, enhance judgment ability, make the detected documents more accurate, and ensure the quality level of sci-tech novelty retrieval reports. According to the problems encountered in the actual combat of sci-tech novelty retrieval, it is suggested that the novelty retrieval personnel should pay attention to the research of related literature appraisal methods according to the actual situation of sci-tech novelty retrieval, be good at grasping and thoroughly understanding the innovation points in sci-tech novelty retrieval and the principle of judging the novelty of projects, reasonably select the detection documents, and provide scientific and standardized sci-tech novelty retrieval reports to the entrusting unit. When searching literature, it is necessary to quote the new points in the novelty report according to the novelty of the project. Related documents are also classified, such as general documents and confidential documents. In the actual novelty retrieval, it is necessary to carefully analyze the cases according to the actual situation in order to achieve the highest quality.