What is it that the old man wants to sue the nanny after marrying her?

The reporter learned from the Xihu District People's Court in Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province that a few days ago, the court heard a dispute over unjust enrichment between employers and nannies. Local 60-year-old Wu asked Sister Wang to be a nanny, during which she transferred more than 89,000 yuan (RMB, the same below) to the other party. The two sides had a dispute over the private agreement. Since then, Wu has brought Sister Wang to court on the grounds of unjust enrichment. However, Wu's appeal was recently rejected by the court because there was no evidence to prove that Sister Wang had no legal basis for obtaining the money.

Wu is 6 1 year-old this year, and he can't take care of himself because of illness. June 5438+this year 10, he hired Sister Wang as a live-in nanny to help with daily life and signed a service agreement. Five days after Sister Wang went to work in the Wu family, Wu transferred 89,000 yuan to his bank account. Because of this money, the two sides had an argument. Wu sued Sister Wang to the West Lake Court and demanded that Sister Wang return 89,000 yuan and interest.

Wu's agent said that during the period of providing domestic service, Sister Wang told me that she was in financial difficulties and hoped that Wu could help and promised to marry Wu. Wu sympathized with his experience and looked forward to marrying him, so he borrowed money from relatives to help Sister Wang. But one night in March, Wu was taken to the hospital for emergency treatment because of illness, and Sister Wang took the opportunity to slip away the next morning. Wu believes that Sister Wang took advantage of people's crisis to gain their trust by fraudulent means and expected to defraud money, which is unjust enrichment and should be returned in full and compensated for economic losses.

Sister Wang argued that she had done better and gained the trust of Uncle Wu. During the chat, Wu expressed his willingness to pay more than 89,000 yuan for her house purchase. At Wu's strong request, she accepted the money. However, in March this year, Wu and his lawyer asked her to either marry Wu or write an iou, otherwise she could only see him in court. She thinks money should be a gift, and she doesn't agree to get married or write IOUs.

It was found through trial that from June 2065438 to June 2007, Wu did transfer 89,000 yuan to Sister Wang, and Sister Wang paid more than 70,000 yuan to a real estate company in Hangzhou the next day after receiving the money.

The court believes that the money paid by Wu to Sister Wang does not belong to the change of property interests and has no legal basis. However, Wu advocated that Sister Wang cheated on the premise of marriage, but did not submit evidence to prove it. As for the fact of the transfer, Wu did not further prove that Sister Wang did not obtain the legal basis for the payment.

In the end, the court ruled that Wu's claim was rejected.