Without the whole time to study, is fragmented learning effective?

Of course it works.

What is learning? In the subway, brushing Weibo, reading WeChat and watching Zhihu are not study, but entertainment. Real learning is for a certain purpose. For example, improving English and writing skills.

Fragmented learning is learning in a short time. This convenience is due to the popularity of mobile phones, which makes it possible to learn anytime and anywhere. Although it is not conducive to the formation of deep thinking, we should conform to this trend.

Consulting companies have a common routine: break the problem into parts and simplify it. That is, big problems are divided into sub-problems, and sub-problems are divided into grandson problems.

Speaking of learning, it is really a big project. On the surface, systematic learning takes a whole block of time, but in fact, fragmented learning can be realized by splitting learning. For example, learning to write, I feel that I can't learn anything without five or six hours. However, writing is divided into determining the topic, organizing the materials, paving the structure, and revising according to the process, just like an army is divided into several roads, each with its own tasks. After this split, in the fragmentation time, you can collect materials, see interesting topics and save them. When there are enough materials and topics, ideas will naturally form, and finally a period of time will be reserved for writing revision.

Of course, splitting is also conducive to our control of time and a consolidation of knowledge.

Nowadays, fragmented learning has become a trend. Many courses also use this learning function to introduce reading for ten minutes and studying for half an hour every day. In my opinion, it is to decompose the system, just like climbing stairs, taking ten minutes to climb one step, one step every day, and finally standing on a high place unconsciously to achieve the goal.