A small colleague in the office has two baby girls, and said that when her mother-in-law wanted her to have another baby, she promised to buy a house near your home and help take care of the children without you. Colleagues don't have to worry too much when they see it, so they readily agree. As a result, Bauer was born, but her mother-in-law fell ill unexpectedly. The help promised at first turned into empty talk. Every day, my little colleagues are busy hitting the back of the head.
After her mother-in-law was discharged from the hospital, her mother-in-law and daughter-in-law talked about Erbao. Daughter-in-law teased: "Mom, if you had persisted in that year and had no two treasures, do you think you really enjoy it now?" Take Dabao well, we adults don't have to worry too much, how happy we are. "My mother-in-law smacked her mouth and said," How can people have eyes before and after? If you can foresee such a problem now, you won't intervene at all, and your efforts are thankless. What's the point? "
Is it because they have no house to live in that they have no children? Or because the house is not enough to live in, and then you can only have one child? What wonderful logic is this? The fertility rate is not high. Don't look at what the reason is, blame external reasons. In fact, in order to increase the fertility rate, the government has done a lot, racking its brains to find ways, relaxing the purchase restriction for a while, and no longer approving the birth of children for a while. Anyway, you can do whatever you want in the end, as long as you can do one thing-have children, have children, you are a great hero, needless to say, it's your turn to enjoy all the preferential policies and measures.
The problem is that everyone is an adult. What is the game for adults? How can we survive? Who does not understand this truth? Is it because the house is not enough to keep people from having children? Think with your toes. Throughout the introduction of these measures, which one can really benefit the young couple? Did you buy a house to save money? Does having a baby without further approval make everyone beautiful or rich?
Many people pretend to be confused and understand. Who asked the young couple if they had enough money to have one more child? Can someone help look after these children? Clearly know that once the young couple decides to have another child, it will be an ironclad lifelong bond. The young couple can't escape the constant consumption of resources, but also have to bear it. So what if we let go of the house purchase policy? Where does the housing accumulation fund come from? Can buying a house in this society be as simple as playing house?
The young couple's salary income is several, and the funds for buying a house need to be saved bit by bit. How many people can say that buying a house can be done in one step? If you want to have a baby, you must make all the preparations for TA. Buying a house needs money, and raising a child needs more money, not only money, but also the company of parents. This series of practical problems are in front of everyone. It turns out that the cost of raising children is so high, who dares to take it lightly?
It's just that they have no children. Once they are brought into this world, they will be responsible to the end. Therefore, relaxing the policy of buying houses, although it sounds beautiful, still fails to touch people's hearts, fails to completely arouse people's wishes, scratches their boots and is unhappy. Whether it can really improve the fertility rate in the end remains to be seen.