Consultation meetings on volunteering for college entrance examination sponsored by local admissions offices are held all over the country. Its purpose is to help candidates and their parents better understand the situation of many universities, find their own position, and strive to maximize the efficiency of college entrance examination scores. If they can get into 985, they will never go to 2 1 1. Even if you can't get into an ideal university, you should retreat from difficulties and strive for an ideal major, because in the eyes of parents, you can get in with 630 points. In a word, from society to family, we are helping candidates to compare and weigh universities and majors comprehensively, so that candidates can finally make the most rational choice.
Faced with many problems, we always hope to get the optimal solution. But the so-called most rational choice summed up by social laws, to help candidates fill in the college entrance examination volunteers, is it really the best for them? For example, we have a candidate who loves literature since childhood and shows unusual talent in reading and writing. However, due to the pressure of work after graduation and the advantage of college entrance examination scores, he finally gave up his favorite literature major and chose a better employment accounting major. Should we be happy that he can easily find a job after graduation? Or is it sad that Kafka may be missing in the world literary world?