Many hospital deans are medical students with poor information literacy. If you can't understand the profound meaning of informatization, their support for information work is naturally not high. In their view, information construction only spends money without making money. If you can't do it, don't do it, just do some very basic needs (such as financial statistics) or cope with the inspection and evaluation of the health management department.
For the information system, what they value is how much money is spent, rather than optimizing the workflow, bringing convenience to staff and patients, and whether it is more conducive to the long-term development of the hospital.
In recent years, the government has paid more and more attention to medical informatization, and the requirements of hospital grade evaluation for informatization have become higher and higher. Only personally think that informatization still needs the attention of hospitals to play its role. The policy is to use information technology to serve medical care and help medical workers and patients. In order to save money, hospitals only consider the functions that meet the policy requirements, ignoring the availability, friendliness, rationality and perfection of information, and buying inconvenient and error-prone information systems will only backfire in the end.