We in China all have the habit of returning to our roots, and our hometown is our root. If the house in our hometown is gone, where is the root? Therefore, I think anyone who has a house in his hometown should be allowed to rebuild it on the old site, as long as his ancestral home is here.
I think this has several advantages: first, it continues the custom of returning leaves to their roots; Second, it can drive the villagers to improve their quality. People who go back to their hometown to rebuild their homes are generally working outside or in business. When they get old, they will go back to the village to rebuild their ancestral homes because there are memories of their childhood. They have been wandering outside for many years, far from their hometown, and most of them are government workers or working hard in first-tier cities. Their personal qualities are very high. After returning home, they can play a leading role in the villagers. Third, it is also helpful for the village to get rich. These people, who have been away from home for many years, have jobs and businesses, all of whom have been mixed up in society and have many social connections. After returning to the village, they can make good use of it and find ways to help the village get rich. Fourth, it can bring all kinds of new things and information, and help villagers to get in touch with new things and ideas.
According to the current relevant laws and regulations, the old rural houses with urban hukou cannot be repaired and rebuilt after confirmation. After natural collapse and loss, the homestead attached to the house is recovered by the village collective according to the regulations. The number of these old houses is not small Long-term idleness is a waste of resources and has an impact on the prosperity of the village. The pilot program of rural homestead system reform reviewed and approved by the Central Deep Reform Group explores ways and means to moderately liberalize the right to use rural homesteads and houses, which has brought vitality to these old houses. If these old houses are moderately revitalized through this transformation, they can be repaired and transformed, which is of great use value.
First, these idle houses and venues can be used to set up rural old-age care service institutions to make up for the shortcomings of rural old-age care.
Second, these idle houses can be used to set up intermediary services suitable for farmers' needs, such as industrial and agricultural product processing, commercial clothing, cultural activities, medicine dispensing, child care, tourist hotels and express delivery points.
The third is to provide a comfortable residence for the elderly who want to support their old age in their hometown and yearn for rural life after retirement. It is also a long-cherished wish of all leaves to return to their roots. At the same time, we can also give full play to the professional expertise of some elderly people and become staff officers and assistants in towns and villages.
Moderately releasing idle farmhouses, promoting rural revitalization, serving farmers, and increasing income and getting rich are good things that conform to public opinion and benefit the people. With the deepening of rural reform, the old houses in rural areas will be worth the money.
Since private property is protected by law, the house left by the ancestors is private property and should be protected by law, and the house should be allowed to be rebuilt.
Feudal society still allows people to return to China after retirement. Are you ineligible to return to China after retirement? How hurtful!
It happened a few years ago, and I still remember it vividly. 1983, a prison guard in Linyi was sentenced on suspicion of committing a crime and sent to Xinjiang prison for reform. After being released for more than twenty years, he was homeless. The reason is that his wife divorced after his sentence, and the child changed his surname and went with his wife. And there was no place for him in the original unit, so he thought of his hometown Wulian. Wulian's hometown has no house, no children and no relatives to rely on, which does not meet the conditions for him to settle down. I don't know what to do when I watch the old man leave helplessly and sadly.
I think that with the development of society today, people should feel happiness and warmth everywhere, which is the right way.
Personal property is protected by law and inviolable.
It is impossible to rebuild old houses in rural areas without agricultural registered permanent residence. If you don't build it, how can you be mobilized to build it? Or mobilize you to transfer it to the villagers.
Because some villages in rural areas are also arranged in rows, if there are rotten houses or houses in the middle, it will affect the beauty of the villages, which is very unsightly. And the village has no right to dispose of the property left by the older generation. What should we do? Of course, the best way is to let their children rebuild or transfer.
For example, my uncle is a precision poverty alleviation household and a relocated household. After the whole family moved to a different place, according to the policy, the old house was to be dumped, but his house was composed of two rows of houses in this village. His house is right in the middle of the row. If it is dumped, it will be uneven and unsightly, so the superior decided to keep it and only dump the kitchen behind the house.
Therefore, when the policy arrives in the village, it will be adjusted according to the actual situation and will not be rigid. Therefore, the homestead of others' ancestors can be properly and reasonably operated and can be continued. Red can be transferred to others, and it does not belong to infringement and illegal occupation of collective land.
Trees soar and leaves fall back to their roots; It is best to be an official, and there will be a day when you retire and return to your hometown. This is the civilization of China for thousands of years, and it has been passed down for thousands of years. When I was young, I went to other places to work hard. Some people even went across the ocean. Those who made a fortune went back to their hometown to buy land and build houses. People will always get old, and one day when they return to their hometown, they will bury their bodies with a handful of loess in three feet of land. Great, if you go out to work hard and leave your hometown, your land will be recovered by the state or the collective. You have lived in a house on an old homestead for generations. If it breaks down, you will not repair it, or if it falls down, you will not build it. If one day, you can't get along outside, it's really difficult to go back to your hometown and be homeless. Do such legal terms and regulations violate China's cultural heritage for thousands of years? Whether to modify such clauses in the future needs to be more humane, so that everyone can have a permanent lair, so that those wanderers who work hard outside can return to their hometown in the future, give them a place to live, and give them the idea of "lifting themselves to see, finding it is moonlight, and then sinking back, I suddenly thought of home". If the land in their hometown is gone and their home is gone, what can they miss in the future? What do they use to love his motherland and his hometown?
This is also a thing that has been bothering me recently. A few months ago, I heard that the land in Jiangxi was confirmed, but my husband's account had to be moved out because the children had to study. I am a nail. I won't move. I will move to Jiangxi early. Because I like my hometown, my hometown has a collective bonus.
If children go to school, if adults don't move their hukou, they will have to return to their original address to take the junior high school entrance examination. This will affect children's grades. No choice but to move the registered permanent residence to the school district. I didn't have a field when I first moved here, and my work this year is not very good. I don't have enough to eat. And five or six accounts are in the school district, and there are no other places. Read a book, fields and homesteads are gone! Farmers must never move their registered permanent residence to the school district, but should study hard. In order to live a good life, farmland and homestead are gone. It is better to go back to the countryside and guard the fields and homesteads. Then they can be demolished and get a million houses. Why are you working so hard outside? Farmers' fields belong to farmers. No matter how they work or do business, the fields and homesteads of their original addresses still belong to their children and grandchildren. Why else should people work hard?
Don't want to talk about it! You can't do this or that!
It depends on whether it is an old house handed down by our ancestors before liberation or an old house built in the countryside after liberation. If it is an old house handed down by ancestors before liberation, it should be an old house approved by the people's government after the land reform in the early days of local liberation, and its descendants also have relevant certificates of ancestral houses. There is also an old house that shared the landlord's old wealth during the land reform, and the same old house should also have relevant credentials. These two kinds, that is, future generations without rural hukou, are also private property and should be protected by law. If the rural self-built houses were built after liberation, the elders have passed away, and the descendants' hukou is no longer in the countryside, then the transformation may be because the local government stipulates that it cannot be rebuilt. Because the land is owned by the state and the registered permanent residence is not local, it can't stand local treatment.
I think it is still possible for the owners to rebuild, and no one dares to stop it.