Legal analysis: When migrant workers browse the information of overseas labor agency on various platforms, they should not take it for granted that the publishers of intermediary information have corresponding qualifications. When migrant workers find their favorite positions, they can first investigate the qualifications and business scope of intermediary companies, and then contact them to determine whether they have the corresponding qualifications. Otherwise, there is a dispute in the process of intermediary service, and once the court finds that the intermediary contract abroad is invalid because the intermediary company does not have the corresponding qualifications. As a migrant worker, he didn't carefully examine the qualification of the intermediary company, so he made some mistakes and needed to bear some responsibilities. The final result may be that the qualification of the intermediary company has not been carefully examined, resulting in more losses or less money.
Legal basis: Article 21 of the Civil Procedure Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) is under the jurisdiction of the people's court of the defendant's domicile. If the defendant's domicile is inconsistent with his habitual residence, it shall be under the jurisdiction of the people's court of habitual residence. A civil lawsuit brought against a legal person or other organization shall be under the jurisdiction of the people's court where the defendant is domiciled. Therefore, cases under the jurisdiction of labor contract disputes should be under the jurisdiction of the basic people's court where the employer is located or where the labor contract is performed. Where the performance of the labor contract is unclear, it shall be under the jurisdiction of the grassroots people's court where the employer is located.