Case: The short circuit of electrical appliances caused a fire, and the tenant owner filed a lawsuit.
In this case, the two parties signed a house lease contract from 2065438 to April 2007. The owner, Mr. Zhao, rented a 400-square-meter warehouse on the first floor and two bedrooms and one living room on the second floor to an equipment company for one year.
20 17, 18 One morning in September, a fire broke out at home. Although no casualties were caused, the equipment and computers stored in the warehouse on the first floor were damaged, and the third floor upstairs was also damaged to varying degrees. According to the investigation by the fire department, the fire was caused by an electrical fault on the first floor.
Mr. Zhao brought an equipment company to court, demanding compensation for various economic losses of 6.5438+0.4 million yuan. An equipment company claims that the house delivered by Mr. Zhao has potential safety hazards and should not be liable for compensation.
Judgment: The tenant neglects management and bears the liability for compensation for gross fault.
The Huiji District Court held that the fire accident certificate issued by the fire department had clear facts and was accepted. An equipment company not only stores equipment, but also provides office equipment such as computers and printers in the warehouse on the first floor. There is a fire safety hazard between the warehouse and the office building, and the management is neglected during the use of the building, and the problems such as electrical load and electrical failure of office equipment are not checked, maintained and replaced in time, which leads to a fire and there is a major fault. It should be liable for the losses caused by the fire. An equipment company argued that the house delivered by Mr. Zhao had potential safety hazards and was not adopted due to insufficient evidence.
According to the evaluation opinions and comprehensive case, the court ordered an equipment company to compensate Mr. Zhao for more than 87,000 yuan.
After the verdict was pronounced, neither Mr. Zhao nor an equipment company appealed, and the verdict became legally effective.
After the judgment, an equipment company failed to take action, and Mr. Zhao applied to the Huiji District Court for enforcement. The enforcement judge served an enforcement notice, a property report order and other legal documents to an equipment company, but he still did not see any specific actions to fulfill his obligations. He called the person in charge many times, but he couldn't get through.
Subsequently, the executive judge found that an equipment company had an executable deposit in a bank through inquiry, immediately frozen the account and deducted more than 80,000 yuan from the case according to law. 12 10 in the morning, Mr. Zhao came to the court to collect the execution money. At this point, the case is closed.
The judge reminded that when renting a house, the tenant should first carefully check the facilities of the house to see if there are security risks such as fire fighting. If there is any potential safety hazard, it should be raised to the landlord in time for maintenance.