Why do leaders desperately lower the wages of their subordinates, but prefer to outsource at a high price?

Leaders desperately depress the wages of their subordinates, preferring to outsource at a high price, because the wool is on the sheep. The leader only handed over the recruitment fee and social security insurance to the outsourcing company, and at the same time transferred the risk to the outsourcing company.

First, the leaders hand over the high price of the work to the outsourcing company, and at the same time transfer the risk to the outsourcing company.

We know that it is not easy to finish a project. If the leader does it herself, instead of handing it over to the outsourcing company, she needs to supervise her employees to do it every day, which is a very tiring thing. If the leader hands over the work to the outsourcing company, the risk will also be transferred to the outsourcing company. If the outsourcing company can't finish the project on time, then the outsourcing company won't get the money. So this is not an easy thing.

It not only needs to be completed on time, but also needs to be completed. That is to say, if an employee has a work-related injury, the outsourcing company needs to bear it in full. This matter has nothing to do with the leadership. This is very convenient and economical for leaders. Originally, he didn't lose money by handing over the project to the outsourcing company, because he had saved the cost of recruitment, file transfer, management and promotion, and the cost of recruitment also included the cost of employing people, materials and insurance. The money is handed over to the outsourcing company at once, so the risk is transferred to the outsourcing company. Maybe we can give less money.

Second, you should know that the leader is pressing your salary while outsourcing the company's salary.

You know, leaders save money for themselves in various ways, not just your money, but all the money they spend. There are many things in it that you don't know.