1. In the information collection and evaluation stage, we should ensure the breadth and depth, authenticity and accuracy of the collected information, and focus on the sources and methods of information collection. In the case of short-term evaluation, the source of evaluation information can only include stakeholders directly affected by the financial supervision sandbox, that is, narrow evaluation participants.
However, in the case of medium-term or long-term evaluation, its sources must be as wide as possible, and it should include participants in a broad sense, that is, other financial institutions and consumers in the financial market, the public, non-governmental organizations, mass media and so on.
2. In the analysis stage of evaluation information, the evaluation subject should sort out the evaluation index system and its evaluation value after the legislation of financial supervision sandbox system, and comprehensively use qualitative and quantitative analysis methods from three directions: value dimension, self dimension and practice dimension.
3. The publication of the evaluation report does not mean the end of the whole post-legislative evaluation procedure. In a sense, the evaluation report only reflects the problems existing in the implementation of laws and regulations, and provides potential possibilities for the revision, repeal and re-enactment of laws and regulations, and for law enforcement agencies to strengthen and improve law enforcement measures.
Understanding of evaluation system
Evaluation mechanism to test the implementation effect, legality, standardization and operability of its technical rules. The function of consultation means that the conclusion of asset appraisal provides professional appraisal opinions for asset business. Although this opinion itself has no enforcement effect, it can be used as a reference for the parties to ask and bid.