The vice president of a university sent indecent information and lied that his account was stolen afterwards.
The vice president of the university publicly released indecent information in the work group, which made people feel very confused! The network broke the news that the vice president of the School of Physical Education of Zhengzhou Institute of Light Industry made indecent remarks in the work group ... On May 20, the school responded to this matter: the preliminary investigation said that "WeChat was stolen" and was actively recovering it. ...
According to related reports, the micro signal was stolen; Then he casually made indecent remarks in the work group ... At first glance, this explanation seems reasonable; Because as the vice principal of the school, he is not stupid enough to do such a thing of digging his own grave. But look carefully, the saying that "WeChat was hacked" simply can't stand scrutiny!
What did you do with him in the end?
On the afternoon of May 2 1, Zhengzhou Institute of Light Industry issued a briefing, saying that Tan had posted indecent information in the work group and lied that WeChat had been stolen, and had been suspended from investigation.
The original text is as follows: Our school Tan Moumou posted indecent information in the WeChat work group, falsely claiming that WeChat was stolen, and the school attached great importance to it. A special investigation team was set up on May 20th, and the investigation is in progress.
At present, in view of Tan Moumou's behavior suspected of violating discipline, the school has suspended its investigation, and Tan Moumou himself has deeply reflected on this. According to the results of further investigation, the school will deal with it seriously according to the law and discipline, and will never tolerate it. Thank you for your concern and supervision of the school.
The problem of teachers' morality in colleges and universities is very prominent and needs the attention of the state.
In the past, we only paid attention to the construction of teachers' morality in primary and secondary schools, and the revision of teachers' law was mainly aimed at primary and secondary school teachers. Now we gradually find that the problem of teachers' morality in colleges and universities seems to be more prominent and has great concealment. If it's not their own problems or being exposed by students, I'm afraid these teachers who have problems with their morality and style will continue to stand on the podium.
Therefore, I think it is urgent to strengthen the construction of teachers' morality in colleges and universities. At least we should conduct an all-round inventory of college teachers from the system aspect and establish a more reasonable reporting system. If we only rely on the exposure of the media to deal with it, it will not promote it at all.
This kind of plot keeps appearing, and the reversal makes people feel like a joke. Such a teacher will not only bring a lot of trouble to himself, but also discredit the image of the whole university teacher. I hope the school can deal with it seriously.