The details of this matter.
Song has an only son, Xiao Song, who is 20 years old. At that time, Xiao Song's job was unstable and he didn't have much savings. With the help of his parents, he bought a house worth 1 1 ten thousand. After all the registration procedures were completed in 2002, Xiao Song moved into this house with his parents. It was not until 2009 that Xiao Song bought a new house and moved out. In 20 16, Xiao Song's mother died and his father still lived in the house. Later, due to the shortage of funds, it was necessary to repay the bank loan. Xiao Song asked his father to vacate the house. When his father didn't want to, Xiao Song took his father to court.
During the trial, Xiao Song said that the house was purchased by his parents and registered in his own name, so the property should have nothing to do with his father. If he wants to get rid of it, it should be allowed by law. Song said that he and his wife contributed money to help their son buy this house because his son just joined the work and had no money to buy a house. I have lived in this house for 20 years since I bought it. If I sell this suite, I have no place to live, so I don't want to get rid of the house.
The court held that Xiao Song, as the son of Song, should have the obligation to support his father and cannot be exempted from this obligation because of debts and other reasons. Moreover, Song is old and sensible, and Xiao Song should provide his father with living conditions.
In this regard, I said that Xiao Song is too heartless. He knows how to raise children, but he doesn't know how to adopt parents. What's the difference between such a person and a baiwenhang? Fortunately, in the end, the law stood on the father's side, otherwise no one knows how the old man will live in the future.