How to reply when you are sure there is no problem? In our daily life, we will encounter many problems, so it is better to face some answers. You know, I've arranged how to reply when you're sure there's no problem. Welcome to learn and refer to, I hope I can help you.
How to reply 1 if you are sure there is no problem? First of all, a sincere attitude is very important, and a cover letter should be attached to the submission after editing. It contains these contents:
Thanks to the editor for arranging the review, and thanks to the reviewers for their valuable opinions.
According to the requirements of the reviewers, the author answered the questions one by one carefully, and made serious revisions to the article. All the revisions in the article were highlighted.
Because of your suggestion, the revised article becomes better and readers can get more valuable information.
Thanks again to the editors and reviewers for their help.
Although the content of the cover letter is polite, editors and reviewers will look much more comfortable. In particular, reviewers need to carefully review articles for free, and it is commendable to find out the shortcomings. Even if sometimes some of their questions are amateur or impolite when commenting because the research direction is not very consistent, you must respect them when replying to comments.
Second, draft a separate response letter. List the opinions of each reviewer one by one and answer them in the question and answer. Just accept the editing requirements of the text directly. Some reviewers ask for more citations, perhaps this is where the reviewer shows selfishness-for example, he asks for citations of his articles, even if it is not too outrageous, or makes a discount, asking for three citations and then adding one. When answering questions, try to be concise and practical, and don't drag your feet. Be careful not to cause more questions in order to answer a question, and try to limit the discussion to a limited scope.
Third, some reviewers have different research directions from the article, or have not read the article carefully, which leads to misunderstanding of the article and thus raises some puzzling questions. When answering these questions, you can quote the relevant sentences of the article first, and then point out the true meaning of the article. Then he admitted that there was something wrong with his expression, which made the reviewers misinterpret the meaning. Finally, he pointed out that the sentence has been rewritten to express the meaning more accurately. This kind of answer not only skillfully answers the questions, but also avoids embarrassing the reviewers.
Fourth, if you encounter questions that are difficult to answer, such as the reviewer questioning that the article has limited innovation and little value. These are the wounds of the article and can't be edited. It is certainly not good to agree with the commentator's point of view, but it is even worse and impolite to avoid answering, and agree with the commentator. Although this question is difficult to answer, we should strive for it, such as emphasizing some related sentences in the article. You know, everyone has a different opinion. Although a reviewer feels that the impact is not great, the decision is in the hands of the editor after all. As long as the editor still thinks the article is desirable after synthesizing the opinions of many reviewers, there is no problem. The response letter can be seen by all reviewers, and a sincere answer will win the favor of other reviewers.
Fifth, the problem that often appears in the review comments is to ask for supplementary information, such as more experimental results or other information related to the article. Such a problem needs careful consideration. If only the reviewers are curious, they can choose to provide it in the response letter instead of adding it directly to the article. And if it is useful to all readers, it needs to be added to the article. For the unreasonable suggestions put forward by the reviewer, you can calmly find an objective reason to politely refuse or provide some reference materials, and don't let the reviewer feel that you turn a blind eye to his questions. If you are still not at ease, you can find a professional paper.
How to reply when there is no problem? I want to reply to HR's employment invitation. There are only four answers:
Agree to join the work
Don't agree to join the work
We have to wait, but we can give you an answer soon.
It will take some time, but it will take a long time to reply.
At present, enterprises generally adopt the form of offer, and make final confirmation with applicants before joining the company. I wonder if you have received a similar notice or just a verbal notice.
If there is an offer, it is more formal in form and has strong protection for candidates. If not, it means that you are employed again, or there is a possibility that you will leave your old company but your new company will not succeed. There is no paper agreement, which is risky. Of course, except for temporary unemployment or fresh graduates.
Whether there is an offer or not, before replying to HR, I hope you can sort out the common items and contents of the offer to ensure that all the conditions are mature and the two sides are consistent.
Let's take a common offer template as an example to talk about which dimensions to measure before replying to HR.
Quotation template example, the picture comes from the network.
The complete quotation shall include the following aspects:
1, clear employment intention
Quotation example 1
As shown in the above figure, the company clearly conveyed the information of agreeing to "join the job". This is more objective than telephone notification and SMS notification. If you confirm your entry, it is safest for employees to apply for resignation after getting the offer.
2. Confirmation of labor contract terms
Example 2 of offer
The terms in the offer are basically the contents of the future labor contract, including
Entry post and reporting route (direct superior)
Contract term and probation period
Wage and wage composition
Do you pay five insurances and one gold?
Other welfare policies, etc.
3. Information to be prepared for entry.
Example 3 of offer
To join a new company, you need to submit various documents to establish employee personal files. The above examples cannot cover all enterprises. Common materials include:
Identification: ID card, household registration book.
Competency certificate: academic certificate, vocational skill certificate.
Proof of labor relations: the certificate of dissolution of labor relations by the original unit and the certificate of social security relief.
Other information: bank card, photos of personal documents, etc.
Provide copies of all the above materials. It is recommended to bring the original when applying for the job, so that HR can check the authenticity and validity when going through the formalities.
4. Validity of offer
Example 4 of offer
Offer is just an admission intention, just like a college admission notice. After receiving the university admission notice, you can choose to repeat it. After receiving the letter of appointment, even if it is signed, you can still tear up the letter of appointment unilaterally without reporting after the expiration of the agreed validity period. Of course, you have to bear the consequences, except for the possible agreement in the offer, mainly the damage to your personal brand.
5. Effective offer
The offer issued by the employer will be stamped with the official seal, and it will take effect as long as the candidates sign and confirm. Within the agreed validity period, you can use this offer to go through the entry formalities. If the employer refuses without reason, it may apply for arbitration.
The above is the idea of combining offer notice. Assuming that it has not been received or the employer has not issued an offer, you can also refer to the above contents for confirmation. When all the conditions are met, you can formally reply to HR.
Agree to join the work:
If there is an offer, return it after signing for confirmation, and call HR to inform yourself that the offer has been signed for. It is clearly stated that all kinds of induction materials will be prepared, and when (specific time) is expected to go through the induction procedures in the company. Ask HR if there are any other supplements or reminders about the entry procedure.
If there is no offer, the signature confirmation link will be omitted, and everything else is the same.
In short, agreeing to join the company means that you will soon become a member of this company, so you should make a good first impression on HR.
Don't agree to join the work:
Call HR and tell him why he can't join the company. If it is a negotiable term, such as salary, there is an opportunity to negotiate again. For unnecessary communication, just tell the general reason, express regret and look forward to future cooperation opportunities.
Subjective hesitation or immaturity of considerable conditions, affecting entry:
Clearly inform human resources of concerns or obstacles. Generally speaking, when entering a job, HR also expects to successfully complete the recruitment of a position, so it will do its best to help candidates coordinate and remove obstacles.
For the obstacles that cannot be ruled out at the moment, you can reach an agreement with HR, keep regular contact as a talent reserve, and choose to join when the time is ripe.
In short, the reply about whether to join the job is the end of an interview. Don't act rashly when you think you have done something. Defining the key information and terms is the starting point to ensure the healthy, harmonious and stable development of labor relations.
How to reply if there is no problem? 3 When coaching or communicating with members in the workplace, I always ask at the end: "So what should I do next?" Or "Is there anything you don't understand? The purpose of asking this question is to make sure that the other person really understands what I said. Most partners who have tacit understanding can probably catch my rhythm. Because I am familiar with their characteristics, I know where to explain or guide more. Generally speaking, there will be no big problem.
But what I am most afraid of is that I didn't ask any questions in that process. Finally, when you asked him if he had any other questions, he only replied, "No, I know. At the beginning, I will believe that the other person really understands what I said and can follow the direction of our discussion accurately, but after several mistakes, I deeply realize that a person keeps asking questions in the process, which means that he is really thinking, and finally he says no problem, which means that all the questions he thinks have been answered; The person who didn't ask a question in the process doesn't mean that there is really no problem, but he didn't expect there to be a problem and didn't see it, so he intuitively answered "no problem".
In the process of implementation, the former will discuss with me as soon as he thinks of any problem, because he has formed the habit of asking questions and confirming them carefully; On the other hand, most of the latter will come back to you for help after making mistakes in the process, because he lacks enough thinking or ignores the problem and lets it happen. These are two different work habits, and the work results are also very different. If your partner always doesn't ask questions, but he doesn't ask questions voluntarily, then you should pay more attention to his "no problem" and "I know".
For members, I will directly ask them to tell me what they understand, and then I will directly ask him a few questions to see his understanding of things according to his answers; For other colleagues or work partners, I will use "Let me confirm with you what we are going to do". If I explain five things, I may say three of them, and then I will know whether he has a complete understanding according to his supplementary information. If he can't fill in all five items clearly, it means that there is a gap in our communication just now, and we need to reconfirm our understanding of things.
If a person is always used to answering "no problem" quickly, it usually means that he is lazy or not good at opening his mouth, not that he is superior in understanding and not good at opening his mouth. We can try to guide him to ask his questions, but I really can't put my thoughts on myself, who is lazy to think, because this is his lifelong homework, not mine. If he is my member, I will spend time training him, but if it is only at work. But I must be clear about this person's characteristics in my heart and pay more attention to work arrangement and cooperation.
When you have questions, you don't have to worry about being ignorant when asking questions. It is much easier to ask questions and confirm them than to make mistakes if you don't ask clearly. If you can't describe your question clearly at the moment, you can directly tell the other party, "There is something unclear, but I don't know how to ask at the moment. At least let the other person know that you still have questions and need to explain them to you. If the other person still has time to discuss with you more, you may be able to rule out your doubts, but if the other person doesn't have time to explain more, you can also let him know that "I'll ask you when I think about it", which is much better than pretending that there is no problem and working hard.
For the assigned party, ask whether the other party is clear about the assigned content; For the assigned party, ask yourself if you understand correctly. The kung fu of asking determines whether a person can finish things accurately.