Resettlement housing is a house built by the government to resettle the residents who have been demolished when carrying out urban road construction and other public facilities construction projects. The object of resettlement is the relocated households of urban residents, including farmers who have taken land for demolition. With the further acceleration of urban construction and development, it is urgent for the government to build as many resettlement houses as possible to meet the needs of relocated households.
The so-called demolition and resettlement houses refer to houses that have been demolished for urban planning, land development and other reasons and placed for residents or lessees to live in. Because the resettlement targets are specific relocated households, the sale of such houses is not only regulated by laws and regulations, but also restricted by relevant local policies of the local government. Therefore, it is very different from ordinary commercial housing transactions.
Resettlement houses are in the second-hand housing market
Several advantages of seeking resettlement housing
1, which is an existing house. Some early resettlement houses have superior geographical location and complete living facilities;
2. The apartment type is moderate, including small two-bedroom, small three-bedroom, and some middle three-bedroom, that is, the apartment type with construction area of 120 square meters accounts for the vast majority, mostly multi-storey buildings; 3. The quality of houses built by the government is relatively stable;
4. Relying on the location advantages and supporting advantages of residential areas, the appreciation rate coincides with the economic growth cycle and grows rapidly.
More importantly, if these resettlement houses have no property rights, the prices will generally be lower than the market price.
Of course, there are also objective reasons. Owners of resettlement houses often enjoy multiple suites, which makes it necessary and possible to sell them.
Booking in advance is very popular.
Many resettlement houses, especially those newly delivered, are sold by appointment. That is, the owner of the resettlement house has not obtained the property right of the house, and the buyer cannot transfer the ownership temporarily after purchasing the house. ? The most common way is for buyers and sellers to find a reliable intermediary, who will lead them to sign an appointment sales contract with additional conditions. It is stated in the contract that the house has been sold, but it cannot be transferred until the property right is settled. ? The intermediary will take this contract to the notary office for notarization to prove that the transaction has taken place between the two parties.
According to the negotiation, the terms of payment are different. For example, some people pay a deposit of 300,000 yuan first, and then pay 200,000 yuan after handing over the house, or pay 90% of the total house price in one lump sum, and the rest will be paid after the property is transferred. However, if the house you bought has not been transferred, you can't make a bank mortgage. The citizens who buy it have to pay hundreds of thousands of yuan in cash at one time, and the pressure is not small.
Notarization is not completely safe.
Not only in resettlement houses, but also in the transfer of some ordinary commercial houses, in order to avoid taxes, notarized sales by appointment are also widely adopted. However, notarization cannot be completely insured, and some notarization transactions will eventually become property rights disputes.
From the perspective of notarization law, notarization has legal effect, but it depends on whether the judge uses this evidence and how to use it. Zhaomin Li said that in this case, the buyer can only use? Should it be considered invalid if the time limit is too long? To fight back. That is, for such a long time in the past two years, you have no opinion. Unless you can prove that you really don't know, it can be regarded as the default, but now suddenly raising an objection can be regarded as a malicious objection.