Fly a plane? This is the main violation problem. An employee of Deloitte Beijing Group sent a 50-page PPT file to the company by email, reporting all kinds of non-compliant people and things during four years of work.
Specifically, this report * * * contains 65,438+00 incidents, including 7 incidents reported by employees themselves and 3 incidents reported on behalf of other resigned colleagues, all of which span more than two years.
The audit companies involved mainly include Sinotrans Shandong Co., Ltd., Beijing Lejin System Integration Co., Ltd., China Qi Bo Environmental Protection (Holdings) Co., Ltd. and listed companies such as R, B, F and L Education.
According to the report, Deloitte participated in the audit of the above companies. Fly a plane? , tampering with the actual amount and other issues.
Informants should focus on reporting? Fly a plane? This illegal audit behavior. So-called? Fly a plane? This means that auditors claim that they have carried out some audit procedures, but they have not actually completed the required work.
The whistleblower said that at the pre-audit site of Sinotrans Shandong Co., Ltd. 20 16, it was repeatedly requested by the person in charge, colleagues and docking audit team? Fly a plane? .
In this report, the education of red, yellow and blue caused by child abuse is highlighted. 20 17 165438+ end of October, red, yellow and blue? In a kindergarten in Chaoyang District, Beijing, a child was stabbed by a kindergarten teacher and given unknown white pills.
The incident reported by our reporter happened on 20 17. According to the whistleblower, on June 9-20 17, at the audit site of R&B Education 20 16, the whistleblower found that the dates or amounts in several manuscripts were inconsistent with the actual vouchers, and was later instigated by the audit project members. Is the voucher information consistent? Fill in all the columns? All match? , and fill in the voucher number.
In addition, the reporter's former colleagues also found that the management expenses of Jingpei School, to which R&B belongs, are basically reimbursed by consumption abroad, the children of senior executives and the chairman. Deloitte's managers and partners found this problem in the previous year's audit, but in the subsequent listing audit, management fees were listed as accounting subjects that did not need detailed testing, and only the beauty card of red, yellow and blue education was simply accepted.
The whistleblower said that since 20 18, he had communicated with Deloitte's management and Deloitte's reputation and overall risk management department (RRG) for more than 30 times in two years, asking Deloitte to properly handle the audit quality reporting incident and re-evaluate the impact of related incidents on my performance score. But up to now, all the people who are still working in the reported incident are still engaged in the audit projects of A shares, H shares and US stocks, and have been promoted accordingly.
The whistleblower declares that if Deloitte (excluding specific parties) fails to handle the report fairly and equally within 10 days after receiving it, the whistleblower will take follow-up actions as appropriate until the problem is properly solved.
? Company response? Due to Deloitte's position in the industry, this event fermented very quickly and the public opinion discussion was also very enthusiastic. Once ranked second in Weibo's hot search list.
Public opinion is basically divided into two factions. Who thinks? I hope that more and more young people like this will let the rules change slowly? ; The other school thinks that the reporter is a? Stubborn? Think about it. The fact that the auditee pays the audit fee determines that it is difficult for the firm to perform its duties in full accordance with the rules? ,? Fly a plane? It's just the default unspoken rule in the industry.
Deloitte's official statement responded: We have noticed that there are some questions circulating on social media platforms about the individual audit projects of Deloitte 20 16 and 20 17 in Beijing. As a matter of fact, our firm has previously received related matters reported by employees through internal channels, and conducted a comprehensive investigation, and found no evidence affecting the adequacy of our audit work. The relevant audit work supports our audit opinion. We will investigate any inquiries received. Deloitte issued a company statement, saying? A comprehensive investigation has been conducted and no evidence has been found that affects the adequacy of our audit work? Still say? We reserve the right to take legal action for spreading false information about Deloitte? .
After the announcement, netizens questioned the statement and said? Is it okay to check for yourself? ? Subsequently, in response to a reporter's question, Gao Li, spokesperson of the CSRC, said that the CSRC had noticed the incident and the relevant CSRC had received the report and was currently checking it. At the same time, Deloitte was asked to conduct self-examination and follow up.