There must be something hateful about the poor. This bastard sentence, which has no sympathy for the vulnerable victims, has now become the mantra of many brainless young people, and even the motto used by their low IQ to judge right and wrong.
Every time I see this bastard, I feel sad for 5,000 years of Chinese civilization. The poet sheng sells charcoal Weng's "poor clothes are simple, but he is worried about charcoal, wishing the weather is cold", expressing infinite sympathy for the poor working people represented by charcoal Weng. However, the poet Sheng didn't say a word about what was hateful about this charcoal Weng. On the contrary, in his works, he strongly condemned the feudal exploitation system that caused Tan Weng to suffer such misfortune.
Chen Tao's "Wandering in Longxi" in the Tang Dynasty expressed infinite sympathy for the soldiers who died in battle and the families who stayed behind. There is no point in accusing these dreamers of being hateful. It is precisely to achieve their imperial achievements that these young people are driven to give their lives to fight for the feudal rulers who have brought people pain and disaster for a long time.
People who believe that there must be something hateful about the poor sometimes tell you vaguely that this sentence comes from Chen Jiru's Little Window in the Ming Dynasty to show the origin of its principle. However, the original words of "small window" are "all the lovely people in the world are poor; The hateful people in the world are all poor people. " This is just a philosophy of life with a little dialectical thinking. What does it mean to excuse the wrongdoer?
The believers of the f * * king words then excused themselves, saying that this sentence comes from Article 6 of Buddhist Scriptures, but where is such a Buddhist Scripture called Buddhist Scriptures? However, the relevant contents of its so-called self-cultivation training rules are all folk sayings, such as "giving may not be rewarded" and "pure people have no disciples". The so-called "pure people have no disciples" comes from Ban Gu's "pure water has no fish, and people have no disciples". Isn't it ridiculous that Ban Gu, a Confucian believer, disguised himself as a precept in Buddhist scriptures, and even Buddhists believed it online?
It seems that from the Tang Dynasty to the Ming Dynasty, from Buddhism to Confucianism, there must be something hateful about the poor. This fucking statement can't be found in ancient China. What should I do? Do you want to give up and surrender? No, they continue to find fault. This time, they changed their minds and said that this sentence was said by Lu Xun, but Lu Xun never said such a fucking thing. Looking through Lu Xun's famous words, they only found this sentence: "I am sorry for my misfortune, but I am angry about it." Lu Xun's statement is an angry statement to the vulnerable victims, but its significance has nothing to do with what the poor must hate. Unfortunately, the former is a chance encounter, and indisputable is a state. The so-called irrefutable is precisely a kind of accusation, which expresses the arrogance of the perpetrators and makes the vulnerable victims afraid to fight, unable to fight and unable to fight. And the latter, pitiful and hateful, is this truth. It is entirely from the standpoint of the perpetrator to make excuses for it. Can the two be confused?
So this fucking sentence is from the Cultural Revolution? No, there is no sign of this fucking word in the language of the Cultural Revolution. Visible, even in such a radical era, China people's thoughts have not fallen to the point of believing such a fucking word. From Buddhism to Confucianism, from Tang Ming to the May 4th Movement, from the founding of the People's Republic of China to the Cultural Revolution, after repeated investigations, the root of this poor man's hatred was finally put into practice in Zhao Benshan's essay Abduction.
In the Spring Festival Evening of 2002, Zhao Benshan co-starred with Gao Xiumin and Fan Wei in the sequel to the sketch "Selling Cars". At the end of "Selling Cars", Zhao Benshan officially distributed the poison of "the poor must have something hateful" to the national audience through the platform of hundreds of millions of viewers in the Spring Festival Evening. From then on, this bastard sentence gradually spread throughout the country, distorting the values of Chinese people, eroding young people's view of right and wrong, making them ignorant and unsympathetic. Until 2005, one of the actors in this sketch, Gao Xiumin, died young at the age of 46 after three years of performance. She was the first victim of this farce. Isn't it sad to die young? But what's so hateful about Gao Xiumin? Zhao Benshan, in the face of the heroism of his former collaborator, can you still say with a smile that this poor man must be hateful?
To sum up, it's time to completely deny the fucking saying that "the poor must have something hateful". The poor have nothing hateful, but the perpetrators who caused his poor situation are hateful. This perpetrator may be a disease, a murderer or a system, but in any case, it is absolutely impossible to excuse the perpetrator without mercy and pass the blame on to the victim. Lu Xun's "Mourning his misfortune and Angering at it" criticizes the wrong belief that "the poor must have something hateful" and is insensitive to the suffering of others, but forgets that he may become a bystander of the poor one day.