At the end of 2065438+2005, the central government proposed structural reforms on the supply side and adopted measures including "three to one, one to reduce and one to supplement". Despite the impact of the epidemic, it has achieved very good results. The supply-side reform has achieved results, and doing a good job on the demand side can achieve a higher level of dynamic balance between demand-driven supply and supply-created demand.
The purpose of doing a good job on the demand side is to promote consumption and realize the good operation of internal circulation. As we all know, to promote consumption, we need to grasp several aspects: first, increase income, second, reduce costs, third, adjust distribution, and fourth, strengthen social security. Monopoly directly threatens to reduce costs and increase income.
I analyzed in my previous article (the Internet industry has changed dramatically, and the giant turning point has arrived) that domestic Internet giants are taking the development model of burning money to subsidize and occupy the market to defeat/annex competitors and form a monopoly price increase. Once a monopoly is formed, the original subsidies for participants will disappear, and instead, commissions will be drawn from each platform participant. A typical example is the controversial Meituan, which takes commissions from settled merchants, riders and customers. As a result, except for the US delegation, the costs of other participants have increased. Community retailing, including the recent fire, is also following the same model, but at present it is a model of burning money to subsidize, but all kinds of low-priced vegetables have made other retailers, such as vegetable markets, supermarkets and stall economy, suffer one after another. Once there are only monopoly giants left in the market, it is only a matter of time before the price of vegetables is raised. Moreover, unlike non-needed products and services such as take-away, fresh fruits and vegetables such as vegetables and fruits are rigid demands related to social stability. Once there is a problem, the impact is very extensive and huge. It is also because of the great influence of community retail. Recently, the official media has issued a document criticizing those giants, and it is estimated that there will be further actions in the future.
When monopoly giants crush other competitors, the jobs provided by those competitors, especially those for middle-aged and above, will not be guaranteed. Because the typical feature of the Internet economy is high unit efficiency (which is also mentioned in the article "Great Changes in the Internet Industry, Giant Turning Point"), this means that the number of jobs provided by community retail is far less than that of traditional retail, which will further have a negative impact on expanding consumption and even bring adverse consequences to the implementation of policies such as delaying retirement.
Far across the Pacific Ocean, the United States also began to crack down on monopoly giants represented by Facebook, and Europe took action earlier. Opposing monopoly has become the common sense of all countries in the world.
When the whale fell, everything was born.